![]() |
an unusual observation
has anyone noticed that this forum is unusually quiet for this time of year?
at this time last year we had like two or 3 threads going. Now, we have none. What happened to the dreaded "water game" rumors and the speculation on unrelated videos and their relation to the next game (if that sentence make sense). For me, half the fun of the game was speculating and waiting for it before kickoff. so am I the only one who has noticed this? or am I just crazy? Waiting for the first game hint is driving me crazy. lol anyway, just an observation. |
Re: an unusual observation
It was fun to speculate about a water game during a drought because we all knew it was quite infeasible. Now many teams have been flooded at least once in the last year.
Plus FTC just kicked off, so alot of us are tied up with working on that. But don't worry, if the FTC game is any indication then FRC will be a bit complicated indeed, so we can speculate about what crazy game elements will be in FRC. After all, in the first 5 seconds of the FTC animation a robot flipped, showing exactly what FIRST expects from teams :ahh: |
Re: an unusual observation
And so it begins...
Next thing you know, Dave releases a red herring, and then it gets out of hand. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
This is actually probably one of the busiest years I've seen these forums during these months.
At least there are actually people (other than mods) talking on here. I remember back in the day when you would go a couple days without seeing a post, or a new member sign up. Gone are those days! :cool: |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
As for rumors, I heard there is going to be a new control system next year... |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
I personally blame FIRST for a lack of preparedness for national flooding. Had we particapated in a water game hundred's of FIRST teams would have been more prepared with aqua-bots. Did anyone put any ringers to good use? In all seriousness, this year should be a non ball game. Not likely to be tetras, boxes, innertubes,....hmmmm? I bet the game piece looks like a jax piece. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
And just because I like to keep the rumors going, the cRio-9072/3/4 Operating Instructions and Specifications available on ni.com contains the following: Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
And the speculation begins... :)
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
What about horse shoes U? |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Unless we get to run OVER the traffic cones, then it would be slanted towards Michigan drivers, we would just do what we normally do to them. That or cursing at them, its a sport up here to curse at traffic cones ;) (As a random aside, apparently the spell checker in OS X recognizes Michigander as a word... sweet!) |
Re: an unusual observation
Unfortunately for those who don't like traffic cones, a game has been proposed that uses them as the game object...:D
|
Re: an unusual observation
No in CA we call it a cone zone.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Cone Zone with Barrel Bullies.
Object of the game is to find a retrieve cones launched into the playing field and stack them in your home zone. Bonus if you cover your cones with a large traffic barrel. Format Change: All bots at a regional play at the same time to truly get that traffic jam level of frustration. Matches extend from the typical 2 minutes to 20 minutes, but there will only be 2 minutes of moving spread out over the 20 minute period.:mad: |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
You'll need at least a few robots designed to wave a traffic flag or lean on a shovel in the end zone to play the cone game. :D
|
Re: an unusual observation
It wouldn't be right to leave out the caution saw horse whose only purpose seems to be to partially block a closed lane, or rather, open lane, adding confusion when it is supposed to add direction and flow. The traffic flag laying on its side could add to the direction/flow/confusion/blockage - then the caution saw horse would serve its purpose, fully.
I think. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
though the last few years have seen the main object as a ball, it isn't any less likely to be a ball this year. The ball is a fundamental piece of many internationally acclaimed games and hundreds more unofficial.
On the subject of the game, every year I think, "how can they ever make it better than last year?" and every year, they do. :) |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Analysis indicates that we're due for a non-ball year. |
Re: an unusual observation
that's a good observation but whether or not there was a ball last year for the game does not affect whether or not there is a ball this year. Its all up to FIRST.
Though, I do hope the pattern stays true. :) |
Re: an unusual observation
I was thinking frisbees might be fun.
At any rate, I'm hoping for something we have to launch into the air. EDIT: We could be required to skip a frisbee-like gamepiece off water. Say each gamepeice has a name printed along the rim, and we have to skip each gamepiece accross the water a number of times before we can let it sink to the bottom of the pool. Points would be allocated for skipping the gamepieces, but most of the points would be in sinking the gamepiece at the appropriate time. The autonomous period at the beginning would be dredging the frisbees out of the bottom of the pool (the pool would only be a meter in depth). |
Re: an unusual observation
I was remembering that earlier this year, Dave posted a picture of a glass of water on a pair of Mars bars. Twice. That must be a...
...Game Hint! |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Aha! Confectionary contest! I like it!
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Well, we'd have to round them up. (Thought you threw me a curve, didn't ya? :)) |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
-dave . |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
At any rate, the field stays about the same size, the robots need about the same maneuverability, and have the same constraints. One of my main questions is: Will there be a robocoach this year? (I'm hoping there won't) |
Re: an unusual observation
I doubt there will.
Also if you look closer at Dave's post it indicates that there is no ball this year. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
1992 - Circle - Balls 1993 - Circle - Balls 1994 - Circle - Balls 1995 - Circle - Balls 1996 - Circle - Balls 1997 - Circle - Tubes 1998 - Circle - Balls 1999 - Circle - Floppies 2000 - Circle - Balls 2001 - Circle - Balls 2002 - Circle - Balls 2003 - Square - Bins 2004 - Circle - Balls 2005 - Triangle - Tetras 2006 - Circle - Balls 2007 - Circle - Tubes 2008 - Circle - Balls Quote:
There is FIRST wiki, and normal wikipeida both have information on the games. Not videos, but still information. Also, FRC 45 has information from 1992. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
by the above analysis, does a cone get classified as a trianlge or a cirlce?
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Perhaps they'll use hemispheres.
I'm starting to wonder who actually manufactures their gamepeices. |
Re: an unusual observation
I actually figured this years game would look a lot like what the VEX game ended up being with several sizes of boxes.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
And since Dave has decided to post here, I guess it's now officially red herring season :eek: Let the speculation begin |
Re: an unusual observation
Now that you mention it, a fish-shaped object would be fun. How about a modification of that game where you have a wooden fish on a stick and have to flip in and guide it through the hole in the stick? To make the robot less jerky, the floor could be made of moving sidewalks (or rather, moving carpets)
EDIT: as far as boxes go, having to build a staircase might be fun. Heck, we could use a giant slinky as a main gamepiece! I'm sure this coming year's competition will be quite different from the last, but I'm not sure how they can make it wildly different from the previous years. Unless they put a lazy suzan type table in the center. Ahah! We could shoot balls at targets along the perimeter. Considering they're playing with floor textures in FTC, we might have some slippery spots (and maybe even a hill we have to pass over where it won't work if we don't have enough momentum). Centrifugal force would certainly be fun, but I suppose we can't play with magnets too much if we plan to bring laptops (the cRIO flash memory would be fine as long as the magnets did not induce excessive voltage, which would be fairly unlikely. The only thing we'd have to worry about is eddy currents from all the aluminum in the robots. Any more ideas for water games? (Let's aim to make Chief Delphi a respected place for finding competition ideas) |
Re: an unusual observation
Wooden fish, wouldn't it be better to have live fish? (water game!)
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
This is one of the threads. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Very nice. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
What if the game was like Driver's Ed, where the bots could parallel park, change lanes, etc...think of the possibilities that could mimic learning how to drive on the road! |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Along with cones, they could have pot-holes filled with water.
|
Re: an unusual observation
I like where this is going. Hopefully someone from FIRST takes a look at this thread.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Oh, and at least one GDC member has seen the thread at least once. He's also changing up his signature again... ... Which simply means that he's (trying to) mess with our heads again. (For the record, it's now "To the six-you give me my fix." changed from something about "To the five-you keep my hopes alive." I don't put a whole lot on his signature, though on occasion it's accurate.) |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Let's make one! |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
"Les Six, a group of six French composers working in Montparnasse in the early 20th century" Obviously our next task will be to make music with our robots. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Or maybe just have them work in harmony |
Re: an unusual observation
I like the idea of making tones and chords (with the help of other robots) to accomplish tasks. It's more puzzle-oriented, but it might be fun
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Traffic cone trumpeting anyone?
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Some random dude's 3 minutes of youtube fame Also, apparently (blog link) there are levers to control the chimes, a gong, and sheet metal. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
On a different note, using chimes as targets (or actuated by targets) is brilliant! You could even have a marimba-type thing (with a resonating chamber). |
Re: an unusual observation
How about a giant funnel, like those things that marbles spiral down? (line the rim with chimes and keep the lazy suzan in the center) The gamepieces would be those little blue racquetballs that team 128 was handing out at nationals. Near the base of the chimes there'd be a shield to hold the balls in and keep them from bouncing all over the place; instead letting them roll down the funnel (maybe in a spiral). The goal would be to throw the balls up and hit the chimes (more points for certain interval sequences). Getting hit by your opponents balls (when they're on the ground) would give them points. Firing balls at an opponent would be penalized. As your balls are rolling down the funnel, you should try to pick them up. The "spout" of the funnel is just a recession that makes it more of a pain to collect balls (encouraging teamwork). Since this might require a ceiling, there could be a giant gong (suspended horizontally) in the middle of the ceiling, where you get special points if you hit it. You are also awarded those points if you fire some balls on top of the gong, and someone else knocks them off by firing at the gong.
Now what could Autonomous be? (thus the problem) |
Re: an unusual observation
We've had robot basketball and nascar..
'07 was kind of like "Tic-tac-toe." Now comes...Soccer? Maybe Scrabble? Yes, robots moving huge tiles under time! It would use shape-recognition, at least for autonomous :rolleyes: . |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Monopoly!
Checkers! Chess! |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Water Game+Board Game... Now all we need is a fire game! I know! on an allience we would have one fire fighter bot, one bomb droper, and one platform bot that would have to have bombs droped on it butalso do the platform thing that we did in 07, and then for your team to get points your bot has to not be on fire at the end but it and you would also get points for being on the platform but if the other allience drops bombs on the fire fighter bot they get major penaltys and vice versa this will never happen but atleast it would make robotics less nerdy.... we mght get some outsider fans too....h |
Re: an unusual observation
Why not go the safer route? Use the robots to play Magic the Gathering. (with giant cards, of course). Autonomous would be building cards into the deck.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Battleship. Sort of a water game. Sort of a board game. Actually that would probably suck as a spectator competition unless it was the Deluxe Talking Battleship.
|
Re: an unusual observation
At this rate we could just play marbles.
But no, I still like that stuff involving tones and intervals. I suppose we could have something where the robots move around the area, find the data ports in the walls (each which has a few kilobytes of memory to store a waveform), and try to assemble a wave sequence to unlock some sort of code. Or they could be given sheet music which they must read and play (and then post in the .abc format. bonus points for making up lyrics to go along with it) This is only the 80th post, and it's already way past feasible. What was I saying about making FIRST actually consider the ideas in this thread? This stuff might be usable in ten years or so. How about really fun and funky stuff, like ferrofluid, non-newtonian fluid, or jello? (and now for my 4th edit) What about different sized balls, so each makes a "boing" of a different pitch? Some could even be filled with different liquids or gasses (helium in one, nitrogen in another, argon or xenon in a third) |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
How about a textured jelly? Something along the lines of clay or play-do for robots. Another option is to have (almost) fully elastic balls, that increase in "hardness" as they near the core. This would create a nice splat-bounce effect. (if you put a skin on it, you could do it with cubes too) |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Honestly, what worries me most is that they'll choose a gamepiece that will obstruct the cameras. Anything else is just in good fun.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Idk...I think FIRST is going to try something simple yet difficult because of the new controller and hard economic times; after all they have got to watch their costs too!
|
Re: an unusual observation
Well, the traffic barrels certainly would be fun if they shut off the lights for part of the competition. To reduce worry about all the switching of lights on the lifetime of the bulbs, they could use LEDs (I reccommend the L2K2-MWC4-11-0200 (that's the brightest cool-white luxeon K2 star that they offer), but the neutral-white or warm-white LEDs might be easier on the eyes.
I tested the efficiency of one of the cool-whites as my science project in 9th grade, and found them to be slightly more efficient than the fluorescent I tested (and in this case, much brighter as well). |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
I was intending it to be one of those competitions where you don't bring your own cards; you're given a deck to play with (and I believe you get to keep that deck afterwards).
At any rate, it'd make it harder to keep it involved with the community. However, they might focus a little more on the West Coast (say, hold Nationals in Washington State). |
Re: an unusual observation
This is probably a lame thought but maybe it will be somehow related to a recent movie. Like Ironman or something.
|
Re: an unusual observation
A water game would be crazy fun! Wow...totally expensive though.
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
That'd have to have waterfoils, wouldn't they? I don't think a hovercraft would go that fast.
Then again, how do you stop a boat going at 40 mph? You can't swamp it, and you can't make it skip out of the water. |
Re: an unusual observation
What happened? Did everyone else suddenly find out what the game was going to be or what?
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Well, I can definitely understand shooting things, but why not catching things as well? Talk about challenging!
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
But that's just me. |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
more photos |
Re: an unusual observation
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi