![]() |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
New non-rookie Grandville MI Second Team was reassigned to an unused number, 216.
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Registration is at 1500 this morning, almost a month ahead of last year.
Every team from here on (less 1) is pure growth. Still missing a little more than 17% of last year's veterans though. So far, more new teams(250) than in 2006 (234), but not yet as many as in 2007 (264) or 2008 (320). (For new teams I'm counting 248 FIRST defined rookies, including the reconstituted team 38, plus two new non-rookies--216 & 2828 ) Projecting the registration trend outward it seems we'll have ~170 more teams this year, so I conservatively predict 1670 total teams for the 2009 season. An 11-12% growth over last year represents a small decline from the roughly 14-15+% growth experienced during the past three years. 2005 growth was only half this year's though. Some economic impact, but not as much as feared so far. |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
An update on registration progress.
1557 teams-to-date 269 new teams (including 2 new non-rookies & what used to be team 38) - better than '07, not yet as good as '08 3.7% growth so far 15% of 2008 veterans are still missing (225) 12 veteran teams on hiatus that have come back (about the same as last year's 13)from: -- (6) one year off -- (5) two year's off -- (1) four year's off (There could be other teams out more than two year's. I just haven't taken the time to go through the rookies exhaustively) New non-rookie team 2828 has been renumbered team 1729, so now team 2702 and higher are all considered 2009 rookies. Sort on the net gain/(loss) of teams (# new 2009 teams -minus- missing teams from 2008): Country Codes are back...:) Indiana has every veteran registered now. Code:
Location # Missing # new teams Net gain/loss |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Quote:
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
1600 teams right now and still growing...
Missing veteran teams are in the single digits in all areas except for: California 19 and Israel 16 |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Quote:
But now it's on to BAE as 1729 ... and that means no rookies at BAE at all :ahh: Looks like a fun event :D |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Currently at 1619.
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Good luck to all of the new and upcoming and old teams at the Pittsburgh regional including my old team 1708. :0 good luck guys:D
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
We're past the 10% growth mark with 1652 teams as of this morning.
That's about a third off the average growth for the past three years. The number of rookie teams (305) is off by 5% from last year, but still 15% better than in the 2007 season. 169 veteran teams from last year, however, are still missing and that's much higher than average, but maybe not as a percentage. Since registration isn't yet over and done with I expect more vets to register. Right now we're missing a little over 11%. The average loss of veteran teams over the past three seasons has been 9.3%, but average loss over the past decade has been closer (10.4%). We have at least 17 veterans return after not playing for a year or more. Only a few days of registration remaining. |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
You sound like you could do some ESPN-like segments for FIRST.
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
General Registration is closed but there are always teams appearing and disappearing from the rolls as the dust settings and payments come due. Last year we ended up with a dozen more teams after registration closed.
Michigan also has an extra day (12/2) of registration so rookies are still showing up there. 1681 teams are registered (vs. 1501 in 2008) 314 new teams (vs. 320 in 2008) - includes a couple of non-rookies and a couple of resurrected vet teams. 180 team net gain (vs. 200 in 2008) 12% growth (vs. 15.4% in 2008) Teams from 10 countries 23 prior vets returned who sat out a year or more (vs. 13 returnees in 2008) A big Welcome Back to these teams: Code:
Yrs outThe good news is about 1% (like those teams above) return after a year or two off. These are the areas where we may need to work on retaining and supporting faltering veteran teams, although some attrition should be expected: Code:
Missing vetsHere is the net gain and loss for each area with the loss of veterans offset by the gain of new teams (or recovery of previously lost vets): Code:
Location # Missing # new teams Net gain/(loss)Code:
CA 146(1) Oklahoma City (1) Florida (7) Arizona (10) Bayou (18) St. Louis (1) Waterloo (7) Hawaii (1) Minnesota Don't know about Michigan District events though. |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
I have nothing to add. :)
Thanks, Mark, for making the 2009 version of this thread informative and entertaining. |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
At least I've entertained a few people.
It was hard to tell sometimes if I was just talking to myself or not, but I had fun sifting the data. It'll be nice to have this stuff to look back on next year. |
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Good stuff Mark. Great to see Kentucky finally see some growth.
|
Re: 2009 Regional Registration Progress
Quote:
In the future, this could sort of be used for statistics in podcasts and whatnot, make it sound official, like ESPN does with sports. :P Thanks for the hard work, Mark! :) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi