Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

So I'm subscribes to NI's Email Newsletter. and the issue i received today caught my attention.

Controlling an underwater ROV With LabVIEW

Maybe FIRST switched to NI so a water game would be easier?

...Forest

*I know it probably will never happen but it's the rumor mill so why not

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Obligatory "it'll never happen, if it does i'll eat a battery" post.

Also obligatory "imagine how much work it'll take to setup a giant aquarium at each regional for 4 days then draining and dismantling" statement.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

actually it wouldent be that hard just make a square and fill it with water and draining wouldent be a problem because most arenas have drains in the floor

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Where does the water come from? How deep? Dimensions? Can the drains handle it? How long to fill/empty?

Also, a square cannot hold much water. It takes a 3D structure to do that (if it weren't for surface tension).

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Lets talk semantics...

6' x 24' x 48' aquarium holds exactly 6912 feet cubed of water. That equals about 52,000 gallons of water. Your standard water hose does about 10 gallons per minute. So lets say one hose is to fill that giant cube? It would take it 5,200 minutes, or about 3 days.

So lets say we were to bring in a firetruck hose and tapped into an emergency fire hydrant sorce. It would take just about 70 minutes to fill that cube. That cube would then weigh 182 tons. Thats a lot of water.

Now the field must be deconstructable, because you have to move the field from regional to regional. To make this aquarium you can't just bolt 1" thick plexi together. You'd have to glue it, so it wouldn't be reusable. The price of the playing field would be incredible to have to buy 48' x 6' and 24' x 6' sheets, especially plexi thick enough to support 182 tons of water. And not just buy 8 or so of those, but by a whole new aquarium per regional to glue together.

A water game is just too expensive for FIRST to be doing. That is, unless they shrunk the field back to 1993 proportions and made the bots 12" x 12"

Also making a waterproof bot is an INCREDIBLY daunting task for any FIRST team to be doing. To make an ROV that is lets say 26" x 36" would be getting into tens of thousands of dollars. ROV's are incredibly expensive to make and maintain, especially those that are designed to do a task, even those as simple as picking stuff up. We can create rolling robots that can pick up giant balls and shoot them for under a thousand dollars, to be picking up something as small as jewelry with a large ROV could cost a team easily over 10,000 dollars.

Of course you can always make a boat type game, which would take away the 3d aspect of a watergame. But if you are going to do a boating game, then why not just play the same thing on land? Cheaper to build the field, easier to build the field, less mess, less cost for the teams and FIRST.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

well most universitys have some sort of retention pond or lake nearby and unless its frozen its easy to get a pump and pump in and out water


it dosent have to be that deep just 4-5 feet just enough so that the robots would be able to submerge completely




and a boat type game would be even easier

and for rookie teams it would probobly be as complex or maybe even simpler than having to build a land vehicle because you dont have to deal with wheels and weight


it would de easy enough for first to supply a modified kitbot type thing to make a flat bottomed boat

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Bouyancy is still an issue, and you'll be even less stable in water than you would be on land. CoG plays a much much bigger role in a water game than it does on land because if you tip over on land, you just flip the bot back over. If you capsize the bot in water, all your electronics and motors just went for a drink...

In the end, $$$$$$$ will prevent a water game. I couldn't imagine the frustration in the pits when 5 or so teams are out of the competition on friday alone because their electronics wasn't waterproof to the point that it could take total submergance.

A water game is just too hard to build a bot for in 6 weeks for all but the best teams. If you want to make FIRST an elitist competition, then go for a water game with brand new electronics and coding. If you want FIRST to be available for all to compete, then you simply cannot do a water game.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

My university doesn't have a holding pond... What about sports arenas? Most of those don't (and many competitions aren't held at universities--good luck in Atlanta).

Rookies have a hard enough time moving on land. Now, add water. You do have to deal with weight, you have to deal with water, you have buoyancy, CG, center of moment...

Fluids class, anyone?

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

well maybe its just florida?


anyways id just like a bigger challenge than this year the least they could have done was add a ramp underneath the overpass or allow you to score on both sides

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

I hate to ruin everyones fantasies of a water game, but NI and LabView are also used in underwater robotics competitions such as AUVSI. There a lot of collegiate teams in these competitions that use LabView.

Lets face it, the logistical problems connected to a water game are far too great.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Oh yeah, let's fill it with dirty muck.

And remember, several event venues have an expensive wooden basketball court under the field. Whether it would hold up to the weight is doubtful - who wants field-sized dents in their floor, let alone having it smash through to the foundation. But no one in their right mind would allow a tank on their hardwood. Even if it didn't leak, those robots come out dripping wet.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

I've never understood why the water discussion is always the field. It would be interesting as a game piece or a small part of the field but not necessarily the field, itself.

Being the field just doesn't hold water.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

Jane,

I thought of this at least a couple of years ago, but I didn't post because I didn't want to give Dave any fiendish ideas. He has enough without our help.

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

ooooo O.O - sorry Chris, Gary's fault. He started with the dirty muck, I lost control...

Re: Interesting Newsletter from NI
 

well its not suppsed to have rotting sewage in it!

why would they leave the wooden court out it rolls up you know