![]() |
pic: Mecanum Musings
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
neat design! although it looks like there's quite a stretch betwen the end of one roller and the beginning of the next....might be a bumpy ride
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Looks very nice, simple, and significantly cheaper than the AndyMark ones. How much does it weigh and what will the parts cost you? |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Very interesting design! It's so simple, enough so that almost anyone could make these in a small shop! I'll be really interested to see these in action.
What size wheel would this equate to? Maybe 4" or 4.5" mechanum? |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Very nice, I will be interested in how these work out should you use them. At a nearly 85% cost savings over AndyMark (6 wheels X $96 = ~$600) and lower weight these could be useful. Keep us posted.
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
I like this my team does another comp other than FIRST called BEST and has been looking at how to implement mecanums with the limited kit you are given, I think this might be the solution. Really beautifully simple.
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
The effective diameter is about 4.375. It is a little rough ride, as the design goes, so I'll be doing some incremental changes to address the problem. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
What would happen if you tried to use a smaller hex for the central hub?
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Nice design! It is apparent that you took practical considerations into account as the primary design factor. There was a recent thread on CD, in contrast, discussing a mecanum wheel that the designer took aesthetic considerations into account as the primary factor... but as a result the wheel needed to be made on a 5 axis CNC mill in his opinion.
I can guess which one is more likely to show up on a robot! As for the bumpy factor in the ride, you could always (at this cost) build 8 wheels, and attach them in tandem, with one rotated 30 degrees from it's partner... much the same way you can use two omnis to smooth out the ride. Jason |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Jason, would mounting two of them like that really work? I mean I suppose it would but has anyone ever done it with Mecanums? |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
For even less necessary machining, you could not mill out the inside of the hex stock, and instead thread-tap the holes where the counter-sunk screws go in. This makes it a bit heavier, but you wouldn't need a mill to make the wheel.
Then, you could also drill the KOP hub bolt-circle pattern into the side, eliminating the necessity of having to make a key way. To take this even further, instead of counter-sunk screws you could use half-head-height machine bolts, eliminating the need to create the extra dimple after the initial hole is drilled. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Quote:
Also, for the rough ride concerns: Once I make the wheel wider, and thus the rollers longer, the wheel actually smooths out a good bit. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Woah, the assembly for these looks incredibly easy!:) Great design.
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
that mecanum looks really good, reminds me alot of the WPI wheel from 2005 except a little smaller. Do you have a view directly from the side so we can see the complete arc of the rollers?
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
There's two renders here: My 1.0 ultra-cheap design, which is with 6 rollers. It's outer diameter is around 4, 4-5 inches. Next is the 8 roller one, a bit smoother, and a little bit larger with a effective diameter of 6 inches. ![]() ![]() |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Great design. Do the nuts and bolt ends miss the carpet? You may want to look into tapping one end of the c-section and countersinking the clearance on the other. Then you could use a flat head screw and match the length of the screw to the c-section width. Then you should be able to avoid any hardware overhang and further reduce the weight. Typically you should have at least three full threads for any bolted joint.
Keep up the great work and please post your final version! |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
I'd love to post the final version, but for me all designs are a work-in-progress. Maybe I'll post some renders side by side with a real thing if these actually get built? It's all really up to the team for what they'd like to build. I am just a mentor, anyway. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Instead, I spend my time designing and planning parts and mechanisms with the intent of showing students that there are more possibilities than the most complex (high school students seem to be good at finding the most difficult solution first...) and expensive option. A mentor should teach the team, not BE the team in my opinion. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
You're completely right. My apologies for getting off topic.
Quote:
How wide do you think the wheel would have to be to give a smooth ride? |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Here's a render of the latest revision. It's little bigger (effective diameter of 8ish inches), and uses more machining resources. to shave weight off. Once I hit a revision that i feel comfortable putting on a robot, I'll be hosting the CAD for anyone that wants it, with only one rule: if you make it or modify it, you also have to put the CAD up. It's time to bring Open Source to robotics, folks. ![]() |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
can you render it with a viewpoint that's much further away, so the view of the side of the wheel is "flat"?
also....open source is nice! we did some this past season, I know we inspired a few teams |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
side view, as in looking at the side of the robot. The view in the left of your picture above. Change the perspective to infinite, so you can see how "round" the wheel is.
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Thanks in advance! Brando |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
The only question i would ask would be if they were to be bumped into would they break easier or would they still have enough strength.
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
![]() Then you revolve it around that bottom line. After that you put a hole through the center for the bolt, then put recession into the roller for bushings. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
To be a little more specific, I was referring to how you designated the actual arc on your sketch. Was it simply a large radius? A spline? If so, what did you use to define that spline, etc... Any more info would be awesome! Thanks again |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
I actually have my wheel 3d printed already and am making a silicone mold of it, and then using that mold to cast my own hubs and rollers! |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
I would strongly suggest that you make your rollers out of some non-lubricating plastic, then dip them in a rubberized coating to make them sticky. You can get the coating dirt cheap at any hardware store (it's what you dip tools in to rubberize them).
I say that because machining softer grade rubbers can be a real headache for the machinists. They tend to tear - even the harder durometers. So they end up having to freeze them then rush them to the lathe to get them done before they thaw. Like I said - real pain in the neck. Plastic would be easier to machine, and in the end probably it would probably be cheaper too. A step up from that would be to have a machine shop machine a female mold that you could pour your own rollers from. That'd be cool and not too hard - heat plastic in pan till liquid and pour in. A bit like pouring those old lead army men into casts. |
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Mecanum Musings
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi