Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   AndyMark Teasing us (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70245)

Eric O 02-12-2008 08:48

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phalanx (Post 778631)
That is a single stage as a understand it with a 3:1 ratio. I was looking for a metal gear box similar or greater in ratio to the plastic one we get for the FP motors.

In theory, if the AM planetary turns a fisher into a CIM interface, could it then be the input for the GEM500? It may not be the most compact solution, but it seems like it could work. Andy, would this be possible?

-Eric

Andy Baker 02-12-2008 10:13

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric O (Post 778634)
In theory, if the AM planetary turns a fisher into a CIM interface, could it then be the input for the GEM500? It may not be the most compact solution, but it seems like it could work. Andy, would this be possible?

-Eric

Yes, this is definitely possible. The AM Planetary gearbox has essentially the same mounting and output geometry as the 2.5" CIM Motor. So, wherever the CIM Motor could be mounted, so could the AM Planetary.

The GEM500 page has been updated with a price ($120), pdf layout, and stp CAD files (see "Downloads" at the bottom of the GEM500 page).

Thanks for all of the input and feedback.

Sincerely,
Andy

chris31 02-12-2008 11:19

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
How much will each additional stacked stage cost?

Chris

ChuckDickerson 02-12-2008 12:03

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 778647)
Yes, this is definitely possible. The AM Planetary gearbox has essentially the same mounting and output geometry as the 2.5" CIM Motor. So, wherever the CIM Motor could be mounted, so could the AM Planetary.

This was what I was meaning in my previous post. Take an AM Planetary (3.67:1) + a new 3 stage GEM500 should equal the same ~181:1 gear ratio as a 4 stage GEM500. This begs the question: What about a AM planetary + a 4 stage GEM500 (~665:1) driven by a Fisher Price motor? This might be quite handy for an arm application but can the final stage of the GEM500 handle the torque? Andy, have you done any testing along these lines to see how much torque the GEM500 can take? This, of course, assumes we will still be getting Fisher Price motors this year.

AndyB 02-12-2008 13:37

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Those wouldn't look bad in anodized red or blue either :)

What does GEM500 stand for anyways? I'm assuming the 500 is for the 1/2" output shaft.

Madison 02-12-2008 13:48

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Andy, what is the difference between "S25-66 Aluminum Sprocket" and "S25-66L Aluminum Sprocket"? Are you finally answering the community's call for left-handed sprockets?

Also, you know what'd go great with these new gearboxes? Low tooth count, keyed hub, #25 sprockets ;)

Andy Baker 02-12-2008 14:34

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris31 (Post 778652)
How much will each additional stacked stage cost?
Chris

$36 (this might change a bit) - This will include all pieces needed to add a stage: 1 carrier plate and sun gear, 5 dowels, 5 planet gears, 1 ring gear, and 1 stage housing

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeepWater (Post 778663)
This was what I was meaning in my previous post. Take an AM Planetary (3.67:1) + a new 3 stage GEM500 should equal the same ~181:1 gear ratio as a 4 stage GEM500. This begs the question: What about a AM planetary + a 4 stage GEM500 (~665:1) driven by a Fisher Price motor? This might be quite handy for an arm application but can the final stage of the GEM500 handle the torque? Andy, have you done any testing along these lines to see how much torque the GEM500 can take? This, of course, assumes we will still be getting Fisher Price motors this year.

Chuck - yes, putting an AM Planetary into a 4 stage GEM500 will work fine. Past that number of stages, we have not done testing. However, we did design the shaft housing to be able to handle a 5/8" output shaft, and we will have a GEM625 available in the distant future (not ready for January).

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyB (Post 778683)
Those wouldn't look bad in anodized red or blue either :) What does GEM500 stand for anyways? I'm assuming the 500 is for the 1/2" output shaft.

We are not sure about colors yet. We may go with a less dramatic black and gray combination. Or maybe bright green or pink.... naa.

GEM = Gearbox Epicyclic Modular (epicyclic is just a fancy name for planetary)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 778684)
Andy, what is the difference between "S25-66 Aluminum Sprocket" and "S25-66L Aluminum Sprocket"? Are you finally answering the community's call for left-handed sprockets?

Also, you know what'd go great with these new gearboxes? Low tooth count, keyed hub, #25 sprockets ;)

L = large bore (1.1245)

S25-66 has a bore of 0.8745"
S25-66L has a bore of 1.1245"

How about a 16 tooth, 25 series, 500 key hubbed sprocket, made from 7075? It's coming, hopefully before Christmas.

Andy B.

AndyB 02-12-2008 14:47

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Wow! $36/stage? That's really.... affordable.

So now you guys have a stackable spur box and a stackable planetary box. What advantages, in your opinion does the GEM500 provide over the Stackerbox and vice-versa?

sdcantrell56 02-12-2008 16:04

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 778694)

How about a 16 tooth, 25 series, 500 key hubbed sprocket, made from 7075? It's coming, hopefully before Christmas.

Andy B.

How about a whole series of keyed 25 series 7075 aluminum sprockets or even plain bore so we could broach them ourselves

CraigHickman 02-12-2008 16:07

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
For teams interested in different colors, do you think it would be possible to work with you folks to either get the housing without anodizing, or with anodizing of our choice? (I'm thinking 254/968 will also want to know this, but if what you've done for them in the past with the FP planetary holds true, then the answer here should be yes? Ish?)

AdamHeard 02-12-2008 16:15

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy Baker (Post 778694)
How about a 16 tooth, 25 series, 500 key hubbed sprocket, made from 7075? It's coming, hopefully before Christmas.

Andy B.

I probably don't understand the market as well as you do, but the predominate purchaser of these would probably be teams doing a west coast drive. I imagine even if they are a smaller percentage of the overall customers, they're buying at least 8 per robot (we would probably buy 20).

That being said, for a west coast they'd probably want a higher tooth count, 18-20 is what I'm favorable to (I've heard some go to 22), and the ability to modify them after the fact for a 7/16" Hex or 1/2" Hex.

It'd also be nice if they were the same overall width as standard hubbed sprockets.

I'd trust your opinion over mine. However we probably wouldn't be buying any 16T #25's, but would definitely buy a whole bunch of 18T.

EDIT: I was just informed why teams use 22T. We'll probably use 22T now, and would prefer that :D

Andy Baker 02-12-2008 16:18

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CraigHickman (Post 778724)
For teams interested in different colors, do you think it would be possible to work with you folks to either get the housing without anodizing, or with anodizing of our choice? (I'm thinking 254/968 will also want to know this, but if what you've done for them in the past with the FP planetary holds true, then the answer here should be yes? Ish?)

We will have some available that have no anodizing. We also do that with the AM Planetary gearboxes. At this time, we cannot provide the custom color anodizing.

Andy B.

=Martin=Taylor= 02-12-2008 19:16

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Now wait a second...

Didn't AM used to make a planetary for the CIM that got discontinued because no one was using it?

Round gearboxes are hard to mount.

AdamHeard 02-12-2008 19:39

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 778788)
Now wait a second...

Didn't AM used to make a planetary for the CIM that got discontinued because no one was using it?

Round gearboxes are hard to mount.

They had a square base that made them really easy to mount.

The Facemount of these gearboxes make them look plenty easy to mount.

Also, it was just a single very high reduction (180ish iirc) and not as modular as this.

Travis Covington 03-12-2008 03:39

Re: AndyMark Teasing us
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 778725)
I probably don't understand the market as well as you do, but the predominate purchaser of these would probably be teams doing a west coast drive. I imagine even if they are a smaller percentage of the overall customers, they're buying at least 8 per robot (we would probably buy 20).

That being said, for a west coast they'd probably want a higher tooth count, 18-20 is what I'm favorable to (I've heard some go to 22), and the ability to modify them after the fact for a 7/16" Hex or 1/2" Hex.

It'd also be nice if they were the same overall width as standard hubbed sprockets.

I'd trust your opinion over mine. However we probably wouldn't be buying any 16T #25's, but would definitely buy a whole bunch of 18T.

Agreed, we probably wouldn't buy the 16T 1/2" keyed* sprockets either. If they were larger (preferably 22T) and with a smaller bore, we would most definitely buy a ton of them. More important than tooth count is the bore size, however. We could live with the 16T ones but would have a hard time with their 1/2" keyed* bore.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi