![]() |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
We certainly know the idea has been floating around in the GDC's heads for a few years:
![]() http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/22422 :p |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
Most of all, I keep seeing Dave's "Boot-Drive" robot that keeps showing up in his game animations. Every year a drive train like that hit's our design considerations process. Every year we laugh, then move on to more serious concepts. Maybe this year we will consider it a bit more seriously. Hey, take a look at the new Vex leg wheels. It makes you really think:rolleyes: |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
HDPE and ice are as close as possible to an "ideal" surface from a physics standpoint. The reason surface area might matter on carpet is because the tread can interlock with the carpet. On ice or HDPE the surface is totally slick, so there is no possible way for the tread to interlock with the HDPE, and thus surface area does not matter, only coefficient of friction and normal force. |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
HDPE is what milk jugs are made of. We have made several robots out of HDPE. Very easy to work with and we keep lots of it on hand. Very strong and durable.
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
For the stack attack game, we found that McMaster-Carr Grip all neoprene rubber had very good traction on HDPE. Our problem was that it gripped to well on carpet (4" wide wheel). If we had less width and more power than the drill motors it would have worked well.
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
the conveyor belts they make are for moving bags around an airport, they are a like tiny little plastic plates with rubber tread on them, were you thinking like timing belt kinda thing? |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
There's been discussion of this issue already, some years ago. Look it up. And, the only way to increase mu is to increase the coefficient of friction. You can a) change materials or b) dig one material into the other. If you try doing b) to an HDPE section of the field, I'll call a rules violation, assuming there is a "no damaging the field" rule again. |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
i know, i think ive read that...... i was thinking treads becuase i felt they would give the most stable platform on a slick surface really its either that or wheels, and i dont think they would make the entire floor HDPE......... |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
Let's say you have a rectangular robot at max dimensions, with the wheels (or treads) a little bit inside the max. It looks like this: _________________ ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| ||.....................|| That's the wheelbase as seen from the top. As long as you keep your CG above that area, you won't tip. As soon as the CG goes outside that area, you've got a split second to get it back before the big crash. If you have treads, you'll still have the same area. |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
ah, wheelbase(couldent think of the word for it) thats what i meant...... i never implied that they were going to be wider than a wheel.............. there like this http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/28106 except flat |
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
|
Re: HDPE or ICE FLOOR
Quote:
That is true, especially if there's a sudden stop or change of angle involved. See, in physics (and in Statics), you can usually get a really, really good approximation of forces and how they'll react with each other by finding the CG and having all the forces act from that, unless you're dead sure that the force acts elsewhere (like friction, which gets as close as it can to the floor, or an impact from another robot, which should be within the bumper zone). If you've got a robot traveling at constant speed, the only forces acting on it are weight, the normal force (cancels out the weight), friction (applied to the wheels) and whatever force you need to maintain equilibrium (applied to the wheels). Now, a sudden stop! The force needed to maintain equilibrium has been effectively distributed through the robot, and there is a sudden forward force at the CG (for simplicity--there's a rule saying I can move it there, I just forget which one) and a reverse force on the lower section of the frame. This creates a moment, causing the robot to rotate forwards. If a corrective force is not applied, the robot continues to rotate and goes splat. This effect is not helped if the CG is high, as there is now a much bigger "lever" for the forward force to act on, and it takes much more force to stop due to the way moment is calculated. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi