![]() |
<R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
|
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
What they mean is that you can start smaller than the box allowed and extend as you wish as long as you stay withing those bounds.
|
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
Wetzel |
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Thats almost putting all scoring responsibilities on the human player. I mean, if you made a really small robot, i guess you could score against other robots, but yea.
Wow this is gonna be interesting... |
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
what i mean is that you can never extend beyond those limits, but you may extend while staying within it. |
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
I'm guessing this is because of the increased potential for collisions due to the low friction surface...will need to wait and see what the official word is...I'm sure that there will be those asking for clarification on this...
|
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
No your robot can still score. You just have to build a cannon, or catapult or something to launch the moon rocks, that stays inside the dimensions. |
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
Quote:
So probably the more reliable method of scoring is going to end up being the human player. Anyone get a time on how long it took those two robots to cross the field? Or maybe how long it took them to start up? I mean its all in how you drive it but yea... I always hoped for an ice game, this is nearly close enough. |
Re: <R16> ?... Starting vs. Playing configuration
The first thing I thought of when I read that rule was "Oh, 2006 all over again, guess we can rule out the arms!"
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi