Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Underestimating the Trailer (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71266)

kirtar 07-01-2009 11:19

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Petey (Post 793137)
I bet it'd be hard, but I'm pretty sure it's possible. You don't need a square chassis, all you need is a way to construct your back end in such a way that the sides of the hexagon abut the back end of your bot while the trailer tongue is pulled pretty far in while also observing the other rules about attaching easily and not hitting the walls before bumpers.

e: what's the shear strength of the bolt?


Just remember that the hitch has to be on the bumper perimeter. Even if you put an indentation, the outer vertices would still define a polygon which would put your hitch not on the bumper perimeter.

Also, to EricH, you only need bumpers on 2/3 of the bumper perimetier. The entire bumper perimeter exists whether on not there are bumpers on the robot.

=Martin=Taylor= 07-01-2009 11:28

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Petey (Post 793108)
Something to think about:

Can you build a robot in such a way that the trailer's wheels are always oriented like the robot's?

Whats the advantage?

If you're dragging the trailer wheels sideways while you turn your gonna make steering much harder.

We've found that jacknifing the robot/trailer back and forth quickly is a great way to steer. Seems to work better than just plain tank steering.

Anna B. 07-01-2009 11:55

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 794776)
We've found that jacknifing the robot/trailer back and forth quickly is a great way to steer. Seems to work better than just plain tank steering.

Exactly. Instead of fighting it, why not work with it?

pfreivald 07-01-2009 12:26

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 794776)
We've found that jacknifing the robot/trailer back and forth quickly is a great way to steer. Seems to work better than just plain tank steering.

What kind of drive train did you use when you were jacknifing to steer? Tank? 4WD?

Thanks,

Patrick

Swerting 07-01-2009 12:38

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
My team made a basic tank drive chasis from VeX kits, hooked up a trailer (also made of VeX) and drove it on a smooth table (the wheels being gears) and while it did seem to jacknife(?) quite a bit it didn't seem to matter too much since the wheels also slid fairly easily.

of course, it's just VeX on a smooth table, and it may be entirely different in competition

eschanz 07-01-2009 12:51

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
I dont think it will be as hard as people are saying, because with less friction it will be close to impossible to get jack-knifed. This is because when you slide, the force from hitting a wall or another bot will send the trailer flying past or hit the wall (or bot) too.

JesseK 07-01-2009 12:53

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
FYI, unless there's something that I missed you cannot move the hitch location once the match has started. The rule regarding the trailer hitch says a rigid, fixed location which has been interpreted by most to mean that the hitch cannot be actuated.

As for detecting the trailer location, you could have ultrasonic sensors pointed out the back of the bot to where the tongue meets the trailer. If the trailer swings to one side, the range finder on that side will get shorter and the range finder on the other side will report a longer range or just noise. Of course, this assumes you already have a crab drive system and there's an actual benefit to keeping your robot wheels oriented with the trailer wheels.

EricH 07-01-2009 15:04

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kirtar (Post 794768)
Also, to EricH, you only need bumpers on 2/3 of the bumper perimetier. The entire bumper perimeter exists whether on not there are bumpers on the robot.

That's what I said. You only need 2/3 of it (the perimeter). Though maybe I should have added "covered" to the end.

Also note, though this is not official by any means: the trailer hitch will (most likely) take up 7" of the 1/3 uncovered. I don't think the GDC will rule that it's a bumper...

=Martin=Taylor= 07-01-2009 19:42

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 794817)
What kind of drive train did you use when you were jacknifing to steer? Tank? 4WD?

Thanks,

Patrick

4WD "long" configuration.

Tank steering.

pfreivald 07-01-2009 20:01

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII (Post 795203)
4WD "long" configuration.

Tank steering.

That's nice to know. We only have a single 4x8 sheet of the FRP so far, and we were looking at 4WD tank steering, probably wide configuration... As a team that experiences a lot of ice and snow on a regular basis, we've been thinking about 'using the slipperiness' instead of somehow trying to fight it since day one.

Patrick

rees2001 07-01-2009 20:12

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 795213)
As a team that experiences a lot of ice and snow on a regular basis, we've been thinking about 'using the slipperiness' instead of somehow trying to fight it since day one.

Patrick


Wouldn't today be one of those ice & snow days?

Booksy 07-01-2009 22:04

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
What if you designed the robot to be mainly driven backwards?

Have the trailer be like the "skis". When you want to turn, just jackknife the trailer and drive straight. The wheels would that way aid in turning.

Or else maybe drive forward, turn backwards.

I honestly didn't think turning would be an issue... until we tried to turn today on linoleum. If you start off spinning you're fine, if you try to turn while driving straight, you better be prepared to wait. And that's without a trailer BTW.

I think the trailer could be used advantageously, if used properly. Just some testing is needed to figure out how that would work. Hopefully we'll have a trailer by Monday. I am thinking of taking some video of it and recommend other teams to do the same, that way we can all examine it and try and figure out how to drive with this thing.

Enigma's puzzle 07-01-2009 22:27

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
If i planned on building to utilize the trailer for steering i would get practicing now.

silicon_ghoti 07-01-2009 23:02

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Petey (Post 793137)
I bet it'd be hard, but I'm pretty sure it's possible. You don't need a square chassis, all you need is a way to construct your back end in such a way that the sides of the hexagon abut the back end of your bot while the trailer tongue is pulled pretty far in while also observing the other rules about attaching easily and not hitting the walls before bumpers.

We were looking into that too, but our team came to the general consensus that FIRST was trying to articulate that the trailer hook-up was to be attached to the "outer-edge" created by the bumper polygon. For those curious about the bumper polygon it is shape created by the outermost points/corners of the robot. (Note, by definition polygons cannot have indentations, or in other words internal angles greater than 180 degrees.) But I would love for someone to prove us wrong.

Team 2811 07-01-2009 23:07

Re: Underestimating the Trailer
 
I think that if you have enough speed when you are backing up the jack-knife problem won't be a problem since the wheels on the trailer have no more traction than the robot wheels so they will slip and slide even going sideways when jack-knifed. As long as you keep some speed when going either backwards or forwards you cann still keep going into a possible orientation spot.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi