![]() |
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
^ the 2002 robot, minus side panels and bumpers. And it was the most beastly robot FRC has seen. It pulled a small car (or so I've heard). Last that I have heard, it is still in (somewhat) working order. For Andy's reminiscing pleasure: http://cryptoniterobotics.org/team/robots/ -Kat |
Re: More Wheels?
i meant to get a closer look at SPAM's robot (180) at Florida but I believe they have, in addition to their normal drive and a fan, a set of wheels possitioned perpendicular to the others and they would pneumatically lower the wheels. these were mainly for a semi-swerve affect, but i suppose could be used as a break. I'm sorry i dont have a better explaination i only saw it from the stands.
|
Re: More Wheels?
Is it possible (and legal) that you make pneumatics strong enough that you mount a wheel perpendicular to other wheels, then when you want to brake, you gently lift the robot using that wheel, tilting it just ever so slightly, and applying that downward pressure and braking faster?
Imagine sliding your hand over the desk, and the sliding your hand over the desk with a lot of downwards pushing..? |
Re: More Wheels?
You can only use up to 78 rover wheels in contact with the ground. No more.
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
As soon as the robot stops accelerating upwards (and begins to coast), the force pushing down on the wheels will return to its pre-acceleration value. But a robot cannot possibly keep moving upward forever, or even offset a partial amount of its downward acceleration due to gravity. Therefore, the robot must begin to slow down its upward velocity, experiencing negative acceleration. During this period, the robot will actually have less normal force pushing down on the wheels, meaning less pushing power. So yes, you can do this; you'd just get a very limited period of increased traction followed by a limited period of decreased traction. Think of if like a roller coaster. When you go through a dip, you feel positive gee forces, and when you go over a peak you feel negative forces. |
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
I'm glad to see 624 won the regional at Bayou ! Go CRyptonite ! |
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/RazorTip...3129 88959794 |
Re: More Wheels?
adding more wheels may increase your surface area, but it spreads out your weight. The net gain in traction: exactly 0. Even extra powered wheels dont help, assuming you keep the amount of power is the same. the only reason why 4 powered wheels could be better than two powered wheels is 1: more motors to power the 4 wheels, therefore more power or 2: if some of your wheels dont have traction, it's possible to pull yourself out of a bind with the wheels that do. It's a common misconception that more wheels = more traction, thats why you see so many 4 wheel drive cars in the ditch during wisconsin winters
|
Re: More Wheels?
Quote:
We have used it in demonstrations at least through 2007. |
Re: More Wheels?
LOL i did NOT see you had already posted a picture, sorry about that :ahh:
And I will work on getting more pictures of that robot for you, it is still lying around SOMEwhere... |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi