Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Motors (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=52)
-   -   how many people have had failing jaguars (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=72199)

Jonathan Norris 22-02-2009 12:48

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
2809, had 2/4 failed Jaguars in our testing... not a good track record so far. We sent both back to the company so they can determine the issues with the Jaguars, I hope everyone who had one fail on them did the same.

nomad725 22-02-2009 13:31

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
ours was not going backwards nd we looked over everythin nd all the wires were fine then one of the jaguars started to smoke and almost caught on fire...jus becuase tht happened our team decided to stick with the vectors

utlinebacker 23-02-2009 12:01

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
If you are participating in a regional event this week, please look for us and say hi! We’d love to meet with you and learn about your experiences with Jaguar. We’ll attempt to drop by each team pit and introduce ourselves.

Regional Event:: Luminary Micro Advisor
Washington, DC:: Brian Kircher & Scott Emley
Cleveland, OH:: Dave Wilson
Manchester, NH:: Kyle Norman
Trenton, NJ:: Paul Jordan
Traverse City, MI:: Tom Fedorko
Oklahoma City, OK:: Scott McMahon
Kansas City, KS:: Joe Kroesche
Chicago, IL:: Bobby Bradford

Here is the weekly status as of Friday (Feb 20th) evening:

Since November, we have received 88 reported failures that we have immediately replaced. Here is a pareto of the complaints:
• DOA:
- Neutral LED – 7
- PWM Missing – 3
- PWM function – 10
• Reverse only – 32
• Forward only - 1
• No voltage on output – 6
• Incorrect output voltage - 4
• Stopped working – 17
• FET melted - 2
• Other – 6

Of those 88 reported failures, we have only received 42 units back to us (still less than half) – which we have analyzed. Here is a pareto of the analyses:
• Flash not programmed – 2
• Customer-induced EOS – 3
• Gate driver U6 failed – 29
• 5V regulator failed – 3
• Missing PWM connector – 3
• Other – 2

We’re hoping we’ll receive more failed units back now that the ship deadline has passed.

My echoing reminder: If you have experienced a failure, PLEASE contact us at support@luminarymicro.com. When you do, PLEASE provide us as much information about your failure as possible (see my questions list here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...0&postcount=57 – and send us pictures of your system, which are exceptionally helpful for us in understanding your use model). Finally, if you do receive an RMA replacement unit, PLEASE ship us the Jaguar that is giving you trouble. As you can see from above, we have still received only about half of all RMAs we have issued, and ideally, we’d like the opportunity to analyze every failed unit.

Good luck at regionals!

Regards,
Scott

RyanN 23-02-2009 13:44

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by utlinebacker (Post 826773)
If you are participating in a regional event this week, please look for us and say hi! We’d love to meet with you and learn about your experiences with Jaguar. We’ll attempt to drop by each team pit and introduce ourselves.

Regional Event:: Luminary Micro Advisor
Washington, DC:: Brian Kircher & Scott Emley
Cleveland, OH:: Dave Wilson
Manchester, NH:: Kyle Norman
Trenton, NJ:: Paul Jordan
Traverse City, MI:: Tom Fedorko
Oklahoma City, OK:: Scott McMahon
Kansas City, KS:: Joe Kroesche
Chicago, IL:: Bobby Bradford

Here is the weekly status as of Friday (Feb 20th) evening:

Since November, we have received 88 reported failures that we have immediately replaced. Here is a pareto of the complaints:
• DOA:
- Neutral LED – 7
- PWM Missing – 3
- PWM function – 10
• Reverse only – 32
• Forward only - 1
• No voltage on output – 6
• Incorrect output voltage - 4
• Stopped working – 17
• FET melted - 2
• Other – 6

Of those 88 reported failures, we have only received 42 units back to us (still less than half) – which we have analyzed. Here is a pareto of the analyses:
• Flash not programmed – 2
• Customer-induced EOS – 3
• Gate driver U6 failed – 29
• 5V regulator failed – 3
• Missing PWM connector – 3
• Other – 2

We’re hoping we’ll receive more failed units back now that the ship deadline has passed.

My echoing reminder: If you have experienced a failure, PLEASE contact us at support@luminarymicro.com. When you do, PLEASE provide us as much information about your failure as possible (see my questions list here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...0&postcount=57 – and send us pictures of your system, which are exceptionally helpful for us in understanding your use model). Finally, if you do receive an RMA replacement unit, PLEASE ship us the Jaguar that is giving you trouble. As you can see from above, we have still received only about half of all RMAs we have issued, and ideally, we’d like the opportunity to analyze every failed unit.

Good luck at regionals!

Regards,
Scott

That seems like a lot of Gate Driver failures. Is there a problem with a design or the quality of the components used?

Sovietmagician 23-02-2009 17:05

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
We were going to use jaguars then all of a sudden one shorted out so we switched to victors and have had no problems at all.

ruhiyyeh 26-02-2009 23:05

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
We've been having quite a few problems with our jaguars for our drivebase. We had two coupled cim motors, and one motor's jaguar failed (we noticed the smell and the fact that one motor was hot while the other was cold). That was replaced a couple times, until we borrowed a jaguar that worked. Then the jaguar for the other motor seemed to have problems, though at least it didn't smell burnt. On the field, we noticed that our bot would start off fine, then begin to stop and start. It would get slower over time. We thought that it might be because the jaguar was getting too much current and then failing for a moment, causing the other jaguar to fail in return. We figured this caused a cycle of jaguars failing repeatedly, causing our robot to be slow when only one had failed, and stop completely when both had.

So we replaced them with victors. Last I heard, one of the victors had burnt out, possibly because it couldn't handle the current.

All our other jaguars and victors work perfectly. Our batteries were freshly charged, and I made sure that the pwms were in the right orientation.

Madison 08-03-2009 03:24

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
A Jaguar failed on our machine today during the Oregon Regional semi-final.

Not happy.

R.C. 08-03-2009 03:32

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madison (Post 832985)
A Jaguar failed on our machine today during the Oregon Regional semi-final.

Not happy.

Dang Madison, that sucks. Any suggestions on what to do in order to avoid jags from killing each other. BTW, totally random but today I volunteered and reffed at a FTC comp and daisy chaining speed controllers was pretty cool. Totally random but just like to bring the CAN feature up.:P

Daniel_LaFleur 08-03-2009 10:05

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ruhiyyeh (Post 828394)
On the field, we noticed that our bot would start off fine, then begin to stop and start. It would get slower over time. We thought that it might be because the jaguar was getting too much current and then failing for a moment, causing the other jaguar to fail in return.

Sounds to me like your CIMs are drawing more than 40 AMPs. That will cause your snap action breaker to trip and then reset. Since it's a thermal driven device once it trips it will trip again quicker and stay tripped longer each time.

Al Skierkiewicz 08-03-2009 11:14

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ruhiyyeh (Post 828394)
On the field, we noticed that our bot would start off fine, then begin to stop and start. It would get slower over time.

Remember that when the Jaguar goes into fail mode, there is a three second delay after the failure point has been removed. It is unlikely that the field conditions this year can cause over current so it is likely something else. Improper transmission assembly, bad alignment on shafts, too much chain tension, loose hardware, etc.

Bill Tompkins 26-03-2009 21:24

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Two jaguars died. Both the same problem, burned out in one direction only.
Bill

clueless newbie 26-03-2009 22:24

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Team 3119 lost one Jag during build testing and our spare (reverse but no forward) during the games at Wayne State.

We're a rookie team with no funds --- (hey, we're doing good --- we own two screwdrivers and a "made-in-China" 1/4" drive ratchet set!). We got a teacher to put up $74 just so we could continue competing! Fortunately it paid off --- we made the semi-finals!

I certainly hope we can RMA the dead ones!

Carmine Rizzo 26-03-2009 22:35

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
Ours failed in the last match of the qtr finals in Jersey.

Oblarg 27-03-2009 19:14

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
We've wired them backwards and had them die. We've also had one or two spontaneously die with no noticeable cause.

I think we set a new team record this year for dead speed controllers. 4 victors and 5 jaguars, I think.

yodameister 27-03-2009 19:36

Re: how many people have had failing jaguars
 
We had another Jag die at FLR in week 2. Our bot took a hard hit on the side. Immediately after the hit, we had no movement from that side. The rep on site would have RMA'ed it immediately if he had more Jags with him at the competition.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi