Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

No. No cooked cRIO's at NYC.
They heldup quite well.

Some teams had issues with loss of comms during matches, a couple of wireless bridge failures, etc.

Humidity wasn't a problem at the Javits Center, because the Hudson river was 100 yards away through a wide open loading dock door, and the weather was unseasonably warm and moist.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Apparently a beaded brass drag chain is not prohibited:

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=12284

But a static discharge wick on the other hand is expressly prohibited:

http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=12228

Go figure. I can't wait to see the engineering explanation for this (or has marketing taken over ;) )

We will be installing a drag chain based on this ruling. It appears to be the only pro-active static mitigation method permitted on the field (other than dealing with van de graff generators on the Robots).

Chain has the advantage of guaranteed contact with the floor and the disadvantage that a corroded link could cause a high resistance in the discharge path. Movement should mitigate that and the charge can be passed along bead to bead, not to mention that the chains will be new.

The static wick has the advantage of guaranteed continuity but the possibility of becoming no longer in constant contact with the floor.

All in all, I think 79's chain solution is probably the best.

Unfortunately, protecting your own Robot in this manner may not protect you on the field when you contact another robot. If a large charge is allowed to build up on one robot, the discharge transient could possibly end up resetting either cRIO.

Also, it may be a good idea to insure that all power and signal leads have as great a distance from bare chassis metal (and charge generating materials) as possible. Normally, we only need to worry about short circuits. In the high ESD environment, we also have to worry about jumping the spark gap. A 10K charge can cross a 3MM gap.

BTW, it doesn't matter to 75% of the teams what solution is in place after week 6.

IMHO a quick fix that should be explored is to modify the trailers. There are only 6 trailers on the field and 6 drag chains are relatively easy to install. This is an easy fix to install, easy to test, and doesn't involve teams having to scramble to do something. It can be done during practice matches. Split the regionals, put chains on half and not on the other half and then correlate resets, chains, and humidity. If it makes things worse, it will do that for only half of the practice rounds. If it makes things better, it will do that for half of the practice rounds. (I'm ignoring the DS issues - they are a different matter).

The good news is that it looks like the cRIO is proving to be solid and the worst case result is a reset. There is probably no way to do better than that with everything floating. I'm extremely impressed by the cRIO. Great Job NI! and thank you for supporting FIRST.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Couldn't we put a ground plane underneath the regolith and plate the space in between the regolith with something conductive? Wouldn't the trailers then discharge regularly as they run around the field?

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

The problem appears to be that large charges build up on the robot frame. They have no path outside the robot. The Delrin wheels are a great insulator, so the charges can be thousands of volts different from the floor.

The electrical system floats near ground potential (from the last time it was grounded). It has no connection at all to the robot frame.

The charge on the robot accumulates until it finds a discharge path. This could be to ground, another reservoir like the Electrical system,or another robot. The spark ionizes the air, and the charges then equalize. After the spark ends, you may have two systems charged to high voltage.

I don't think that the exact mechanisms that are causing the problem(s) have been identified. But keeping the robot frame and floor close to the same potential would at least prevent the robot frame from building up a high voltage charge.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

our team found out that our robot was a very efficient vann-de-graff generator ( we have super-fuzzy paint rollers spinning against PVC!!!, oh and di i mention, there are two, one at the top, and one at the bottom, with surgical tubin in between...)

i've been shocked many times, and at the PDX regional, several robots would drive across the field, hit the wall, discharge the static and die...

this led to some teams mot doing at all as well as they could have...

also, the feild was set up on top of big rubber mats, on top of an ice rink... (i don't know why they didn't just use the ice!!!

I hope this whole fiasco is figured out before championships!!!!!

-Z

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

I would get a piece of braided copper ground wire, about 1 in, and drag that. We had a problem with static in our shop when we were testing crab drive ad that is what we did to fix the problem. With our new drive system we have not had any problems with static, knock on wood.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

If you read a little more into it, you will notice the chain group was just using chain attached to frame. While the static discharge wick also asked about the use of bleed resistors to ground the frame. We know electrical connections to the frame are prohibited, but I think static wicks attached in a manner similar to the drag chain would be acceptable by the GDC.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Thats how I read it.

Chain attached to frame only = good.
Static wicks attached to control electronics AND frame = bad.

Still better to ask the specific question of "Wicks attached to frame only = good?"

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Teenager: Dad, May I use the car?

Teenager: And may I have the $20 bill on the kitchen counter?

Dad: No and No.

Where I come from this means NO, you cannot use the car and NO, you cannot have the 20 bucks. It does not mean the $20 is yours but you can't use the car. ;)

I am not arguing the GDC's intent. I certainlyl have no way of knowing their intent other than by the words they write. I am just pointing out that words have meaning. There is no reasonable engineering basis I can think of why a beaded chain would be allowed and a static wick prohibited just like there is no way under the rules of English to read No and No to mean No and Yes. ;)

It's far less effort to just buy the brass chain. Anyway, the GDC seems to have determined that there are no actual static problem that a spray bottle won't solve.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

This is an interesting discussion.
FIRST wants feedback on how our system are performing. The Northern-Climates are expected to have a harder time due to the drop in humidity in the Winter months.

I have dabbled in ESD measurements and the verticle ESD wave occurring across the conductive (ground) playing surface(ice rink) can be pretty large too. This wave requires intense engineering to solve for electronic devices.

Please provide feedback to them, good or bad. Describe how your components are mounted in detail. Wood or Lexan. How do you isolate it from the chassis.
if they are looking for the best way to mount a CRio in space, maybe your design will be selected.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

The regolith is also nonconductive. I would put it's voltage standoff rating in the tens of Kv range or better. Maybe I am missing something here, but I don't see how a drag chain could have any additional effect. When you use a drag chain over concrete, the material is conductive to some extent and likewise for carpet depending on the humidity and moisture content of the materials. The regolith is adverse to moisture absoption so it's electrical properties should not change over a weekend.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Al -

I had the exact same thoughts 24 hours ago. However, some time with the ESD gun made me revise my thinking.

Think of the regolith as an array of isolated capacitors. As you drive across the surface, you steal charge from these capacitors. Dragging the chain gives it back. If your only static source is the rover wheel / regolith interaction, this should do a good bit to improve things, especially if your chain sweeps the same area your wheels do.

If your charge imbalance comes from your ball manipulation, you won't be able to directly return the charge by this method. However, you will be able to spread the effect over the area you sweep.

Additionally, the capacitors are actually connected with very high value resistors. These will allow the charge imbalance to slowly spread over the surface.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Erik,
Since the gun is the source, what did tests did you perform that led you to this conclusion? If the floor can be modeled as a series of capacitors, what is the other plate of the capacitor and why would a 28x38 robot frame not also be part of the capacitive equivalent circuit? I can agree with the series resistor part, but at the insulation level of fiberglass and gel coating and the material's inability to absorb moisture, the series resistance must be pretty high. i.e.>100Mohm. I have done a cursory check on electrical characteristics of this material and so far I have not found any. However, looking at the gel coating and polymer base material as likely being similar electrical properties, I am guessing the surface resistivity to be in the 10^12 ohms/cm or higher. In putting all the reports together (and in the absence of better testing) I am guessing that the static is a condition of the carpet to FRP transition rather than the robot to FRP. If this is the case, then a drag chain will not be effective until the chain contacts the carpet at the field borders. Should this be the case, then chains should be effective if applied to multiple points on the exterior dimensions of the robot, to insure charge drains off prior to a robot to field border interaction.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Al/Eric

While the chain idea may seem counter intuitive, I've have got PMs from multiple teams saying it worked. Like Eric eludes, the FRP is like a series of capacitors connected by high value resistors. I know some of these bots are building incredible potential by being isolated, running high speed ball manipulation devices like tornado and belt drives and then being completely insulated by at least 3" due to the 6" plastic wheel. So remember that spark gap is all attributable to voltage potential and distance, even if the FRP isn't "real" conductive, a huge potential on a bot could be bleed off. Either a bot is going to build enough potential to have the spark jump from their frame to the FRP floor (which is a scary voltage thought) or they are going to have enough potential to jump from when they get near the grounded arena boundary. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the spark gaps we're getting at the arena boundaries exceed 1-2", big EMPs. You know air isn't really conductive, but I've seen alot of lightening in my time :D It all comes down to the triboelectric series, anything we can do to encourage the static voltage potential to transfer will help the ESD/EMP effects.

Re: possible solution to the static problem
 

Bob,
I understand that if the problem is regolith to carpet and a team has a chain that contacts the carpet before they hit a field border, then it may work as the discharge path is carpet to robot. In looking at Bill's Blog and the suggestion that carpets be made wet at the field borders, there seems to be mounting evidence that the floor materials are the prime fault. When we walk out and set the robot on the playing field, it then becomes the same charge as the Regolith. As robots move about, the charge builds up constantly on all robots as the interface between the FRP and carpet gets exercised. I would like to see if an experiment consisting of wire under the FRP and across the carpet to the field border might work better than water on the carpet. 3M makes a nice product that is a copper foil with a conductive adhesive that could easily be added to the field and would not likely produce any serious change in game play. The tape is available in various widths and can be purchased from Digikey.