![]() |
[FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Here is a sample of our autonomous. It gets two racks then scores them, check it out. Let us know what you think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xQszAir01k |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
I have a feeling that RI went very well for you guys today...
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Very impressive! But aren't you worried about running into the other robots if they try any autonomous? Or are you using the sonar to look for other robots?
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Yeah. I feel that there is too much room for error. If you run into something and if you are using encoder counts, the exact distances will be different on the field.
Personally, one which scores one at a time has more insurance. None the less. SO good. |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
We used light sensors to pick up the racks. True, there is room for error over the entire program, but "one which scores one at a time" in auto will never have a remote possability of scoring 190 points in auto. We made an auto that got one rack, and then we made this one.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
If they're scored in autonomous and not de-scored during the rest of the match, the pucks will be counted a second time. So, 165 + 165 for pucks. 25 for clearing the racks. 20 for getting both robots off the field. Max score for a team is 375 points.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
The possibility is not remote. It's just more likely that you will get at least one rack, rather that not get any at all. And then at world, where almost ever single robot will be moving, running into someone might be a big issue.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
I saw this Auto in the finals at the RI regional. It was pretty sick. It was awesome teaming up with you guys again!
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
nice winning with you guys, great finals round |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Nice job... looking forward to seeing you folks in Atlanta.
-Jonathan |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Crazy good, I'd recommend hooking up some ultrasonics for avoidance techniques, while avoiding a robot, keep track of the encoders, and then do the reverse movements :P
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Hey..Andy..No giving people my ideas. :D.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Well, it's not that hard to implement. Let's say you're following a code, and something's not right. For example, if you're using a compass sensor, your sensor indicates you're not facing in the right direction or something, at that moment, your robot start counting encoder counts and angle measurements from the initial "alarm". After you no longer have movement or your encoders stop moving, then you simply perform the actions you did in reverse.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
if (interferenceDetected) { //do something } else { //do something else } |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
"//do something else" Were you thinking "Different Goal" or "Different approach to the Same Goal"? |
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
From our experiences, the ultrasonic sensors aren't reliable enough for accurate use in robot-avoidance procedures.
|
Re: [FTC]: 121 Autonomous
The other problem is that form the videos the code seems to take 29-ish seconds, leaving no time to retrace your footsteps even if you could.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi