![]() |
Team 71's 2002 robot
Hey,
So I wasn't around in 2002, but I have heard many stories about team 71's robot that year. I have seen video from Einstein, and I am very curious as to how the "walking" mechanism worked. If someone from 71, or anyone who remembers, could explain it or has pics, that would great. Thanks, Seth |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I just want to make sure I'm getting this right lol:
It was impossible for the other alliance to win if 71 got their thing out quick enough, am I right? |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I wasn't around in 2002 (FLL maybe) but from this video on the HOT team site link
it looks like it was really hard to overcome the Beast's ability to grab onto all three of the goals in the first seconds of the match. The HOTBOT tried to ram their arm, and that match the Beast only grabbed two goals. BUT, they also grabbed onto our robot and dragged it with them for the rest of the match. I'm curious as to why 71 didn't grab any of the goals in the second Einstein final match (from the vids on TBA). |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
It was a combination of SPAM's (team 180) incredible speed and a well thrown soccer ball at the beginning of the match. The ball ended up under 71's machine as it fell into it's operating mode as SPAM made contact. Our alliance (311 308 180) went on to beat them that match to make it a 1-1 tie in the Finals. I have to mention that one of our alliance partners, team 308 from Walled Lake Michigan. Their robot was able to pick up 2 180lb goals and then move forward into the scoring zones. Looking back I appreciate the ability to do that given the limited motor selections, transmissions and technology available at the time. You have to realize this was pre-AndyMark after all! Team 311 only lasted 2 more years after that. The Championship Finals at Epcot was one of our highest achievements. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
what the heck is this "tether" the MC is talking about? it looks like some sort of ribbon? Does it extend the robot to the "end zone?" what is the significance in that?
sorry, I was only 25 then and in school at the time. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Here's a description of the 2002 game: http://www.team237.com/2002game.html
Here's a good photo of their robot that year: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/12168 Their feet were made from filecards. They didn't actually lift the cards, instead they shuffled them back and fourth to move the bot forward. Try it yourself, put a filecard face down on the carpet and try to push it back and fourth. Now imagine a hundred pounds of weight on the card and you can see why nobody could push 71 backwards. Once 71 had the goals that year could be pushed sideways, but not backwards. You can see it happen in one of the videos I have from 2002, but I don't remeber which one. http://www.students.ccsu.edu/~rodriguezjel/2002/ |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I heard from someone that played against that robot that it tracked the middle goal, but if the goal moved then they would only be able to grapple one goal. the middle one. They also said that they developed an auton that would run out to the middle of the field and ram the middle goal in order to throw them off.
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
We (190) used them as well, but as anchors. The robot would drive in between two goals, latch on with cables/hooks and drive past into our zone. The anchors would push down into the carpet, raise the drive wheels, and then pull the goals back. It was literally impossible to move the robot. I had always hoped to go head-to-head with 71 to see if they could move us without ripping a hole in the carpet underneath one/both of our robots, but we never met up on the field. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
71 could be beat out to the middle goal, like 180 did, but it was rare. Here's the national semi, team 71 v team 60. 60 just beats 71 to the goals, but 71 wins out. It was possibly the most anticipated match of the year. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAmAn...eature=related 71 could grab and push as mentioned, 60 could grab 2 goals, lift them off the carpet and spin them around the robot so no one could grab them. Quite impressive when you consider those goals weighed about 180lbs each. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
At the Midwest regional that year my team, 93, beat them to the center goal by about 1 sec and rammed it into them lifting the top of their robot into the middle of the two platforms lifting all their wheels of the ground causing them to not move the rest of the match. We ended up winning the match, I've never heard a crowd cheer louder in all my years since, when that happened.
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
Remember, you don't have to have an autonomous period to be autonomous. You can run the entire match autonomously. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
But not many teams used them for their intended tracking purposes. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
I know exactly what you mean. You guys had an awesome machine. Looking back though I can truly say it was a great time, win or lose! |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Oh how I love these types of threads.
We get veteran members of the FIRST community coming in and sharing their wisdom of FIRST history. It's always nice to hear stories from back before I was really involved. 2002 was my first year, as a spectator, in FIRST. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
In the second match of the Einstein finals, SPAM beat us to the center goal and our arms missed the outer goals. We were left without any goals and that robot was not designed to do anything more than move forward fast and then move forward slow. I tried to do what I could to turn the robot and the intent was to push the goals and all robots into our endzone, but that never happened as an axle got bent as our robot got smashed against the side rail. We sat the third match as 173 and 66 finished what we had started. Ah the good old days :D |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Kevin,
could you describe how the walking/shuffling mechanism was designed/how it worked? |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I found another video that I had on my laptop from 2002, so I uploaded it to YouTube. It is of the Midwest Regional finals. There is a great closeup of the walking filecards from 0:23 to 0:27.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4slvnvPHW8 |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
The more you guys talk about 2002 the more I wish I was around then. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
I don't have sound on right now, so the game doesn't look too exciting. I'll have to read the rules later. I too wish I was around in 2002! |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
It's furn to see all these names I recognize. :D
If I recall correctly the file cards were on short legs that allowed the file cards to pivot back and up when the carrier was moved forward. They were beautifully constructed. They were having issues with being turned around at West Michigan. It was a purpose built machine, it could only move forward and couldn't really turn, so if you could turn them around they couldn't move the goals into their home zone. They had added file card material to the rear wheels to prevent this at the championship. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
This was a typical Mark Koors invention. During brainstorming, he said "let's just throw the balls up into the basket with a wheel". The students and other mentors (me included) just said... "yeah, right". After many weeks of tweaking, this ball thrower was very efficient. I have the dubious honor of being the coach in this match AND the dreadful F-3 match at Boilermaker this year. Maybe I should remind our alliance before each final-finals match "hey... let's try not to score on ourselves." Andy B. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
Our team had to go up against the Bionic Bulldogs (60) that year in the Finals at SVR - the robot that team 60 built would grab two goals in the first few seconds of each match and your only defense against them was to beat them there. One team rebuilt their gearing to try and basically ram 60 as hard as they could in teh first few moments of the match. During the lunch break on Friday at SVR, team 60 did a demo for a news crew where they grabbed both goals, lifted them, and then spun them at about 60 rpm. Quite a sight, however they never spun them during match play. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
I do know of at least one team that could have beaten them despite losing the race to the goals, though. 330 was capable (tested in a practice match, both agreeing) of shoving 60 under the right conditions, like with 330's 3rd goal grabber close to the floor. (It was a wedge with a hole cut for pipes, and still has the scratches from that practice match.) |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
The good 'ol wayback machine came to the rescue again. From the competition manual in terms of scoring
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I like thinking about previous years games with LARGE objects that we moved around with the robots and had to interacts with the pieces. The giant "puck", the 3 goals in 02, the tetertotter.... things that were easy but not easy to move.
-Mike AA |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Looking back at how those 180lb goals were handled and how some were able to move around with over 400lbs of total weight. All of this powered by drill motors alone or drill motor/FP combinations.
I wonder what we could have done if we had CIM's, Toughboxes or AM shifters? |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
Quote:
And there were teams out there with an andymark transmission. (One team at least: 45 ;) ), and there were multispeed transmissions of many varieties (in 2002 45 developed what would become the first iteration of what we now know as the andymark transmission). |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
I wish I could provide more detail on how exactly the feet worked. It was a cam that made the feet move back and forth linearly, but due to the direction of the metal on the file cards, it would only grip when moving one direction. Beyond that, I'm the wrong person to ask. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
The ridiculous capabilities of this robot are what push me ever year to try to think of a game winning strategy.The first thing that goes through my mind after seeing the game each year is "WWBD?" with this particular robot usually in mind.
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
And after seeing 71's 2002 robot, I have been hard pressed to find a robot that achieves the game challenge as well as they did back then. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
I think the only other bot I've ever seen that has been about as powerful and decisive has been 1114 in 2008. I'd like to see some of these older scoring pieces brought back, they seem more impressive than the past couple of years somehow. Not the same exact game but similar scoring devices.
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
They would make sense, in terms of availability. I mean, compared to orbit balls, they're everywhere (however, it's not quite as easy to make your own....) |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
I would love to see a game like 2002 appear very soon. That game was so simple in terms of game pieces and field, but brought some intense gameplay. The big game pieces also look amazing to spectators. When showing off your robot to parents, it also looks more impressive to have giant games pieces to manipulate compared to little balls (although a 2006 robot that can track and shoot at a range of 10'+ is very very impressive). |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
|
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
My favorite robot that year was 980's "popcorn popper" that shot the balls straight up and bounced them into a hopper at the top. The first time they tried it the ball blew through the bouncing plate and hit the ceiling, of the gym. I still use 71's robot as an example of the tradeoffs of power. They were able to transmit a tremendous amunt of torque to the floor, but to do so they travelled very slowly. But they had something like 2 minutes to go 3 or 4 feet. They had all the time in the world. I also remember seeing file card shaped spots where the pile had been ripped off of the carpet at IRI. |
Re: Team 71's 2002 robot
Quote:
But yeah... the problem with this year is that there isn't a very impressive task to take on. In 2002, you could drive down the line of balls in a handful of seconds and earn hundreds of "wows" like team 95 did. In 2007, you lift two robots in a second like 1717 did. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi