| smurfgirl |
01-05-2009 12:21 |
Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi
(Post 856397)
Did this many people really not like Overdrive? I thought it was pretty fun to watch with good robots out on the field like on Einstein and in the divisions.
|
It was okay... but it was pretty lacking in the strategy department. Game play itself tended to be fairly repetitive from match to match, making things generally more boring than other games. I did like Overdrive, and I did not vote against it this round, but there are definitely better games out there.
Edit: In response to the post below me (apparently I'm not allowed to post again, is the "ensuring equal participation" message new?)- Eric, I find it funny that you liked eliminations strategy better because I felt we didn't get to put our strategy into action until the finals on Archimedes. Every other match we played or watched before then involved a pretty typical combination of the two stronger offensive teams driving around, picking up the ball, hurdling, lather-rinse-and-repeat while the third alliance partner either drove in circles or played some sort of "prevent the other alliance from getting the ball/scoring the ball" defense. In the Archimedes finals, we kept switching our offensive players during the match which was somewhat interesting to watch, confused the other alliance to no end, and is the only reason we came back after losing the first match. And then we got decimated in semis on Einstein. But yeah... not too much dynamic strategy overall like we've seen in other games.
|