Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Games/Trivia (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=84)
-   -   FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four* (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77569)

Justin Montois 05-06-2009 13:57

FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Here's how it works. Each week we will "vote off" a past FIRST game until we have our "Survivor"



Voted off
Round 1: 2000- Co-Opertition FIRST
Round 2: 2001- Diabolical Dynamics
Round 3: 1995- Ramp n Roll
Round 4: 2007- Rack n' Roll
Round 5: 2003- Stack Attack
Round 6: 2005- Triple Play
Round 7: 2002- Zone Zeal
Round 8: 1993- Rug Rage
Round 9: 2008- FIRST Overdrive
Round 10: 1992- Maize Craze
Round 11: 1999 Double Trouble
Round 12: 1997 Torrid Terror
Round 13: 1998 Ladder Logic

If you are unsure about past games, you can read up on them on the links below:

http://firstwiki.net/index.php/Game

http://www.first-a-holics.com/competitions/

http://www.technokats.org/historyproject.php

delsaner 05-06-2009 14:10

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
FINAL FOUR ZOMG-BBQ
:eek: :eek:

my vote is Hexagon Havoc

Jeff Rodriguez 05-06-2009 16:16

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Keep '06 alive people!

sgreco 05-06-2009 20:03

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Rodriguez (Post 862500)
Keep '06 alive people!

Little too late, I already voted for it. :D

With the games left I think 04 should run away with it. My favorite is still 07 though...

dodar 06-06-2009 12:30

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Finally, thank you
another '07 lover :D

ATannahill 06-06-2009 12:33

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Rack n' Roll is my favorite game, I wonder how the results would differ if we did a tournament instead of survivor.

sgreco 06-06-2009 13:38

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 862565)
Rack n' Roll is my favorite game, I wonder how the results would differ if we did a tournament instead of survivor.

That'd be a cool thing to do when this is done. We could use the reverse order in which they were voted off as seeding numbers.

smurfgirl 06-06-2009 14:59

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
I find it interesting that the games from years ending in 4 and 6 are the only ones left. I wonder if this means 2014 and 2016 will also be great games?

sgreco 07-06-2009 17:46

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
I personally think 2003 looks really fun, I wasn't around then though...so I wouldn't know. I guess it's really hard to vote about games that you weren't around for.

Schnabel 07-06-2009 23:21

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Personally I think 2008 should have made it farther because, like 2006, it was easy to describe to the Non-FIRST audience. Also I thought it was more high paced.

smurfgirl 08-06-2009 00:10

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 862564)
Finally, thank you
another '07 lover :D

2007 is one of my favorites, if not my favorite, as well. I was sad to see it go so early.

sgreco 08-06-2009 07:17

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schnabel (Post 862702)
Personally I think 2008 should have made it farther because, like 2006, it was easy to describe to the Non-FIRST audience. Also I thought it was more high paced.

I have to agree here, 2008 is one of the most underrated games. I think it's mostly because people thought the no defense thing took out too much strategy. The other reason I think people didn't like it is because of G22, which I had no problem with, but a bunch of teams did apparently. 2008 was definitley a great game to watch.

delsaner 08-06-2009 08:26

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schnabel (Post 862702)
Personally I think 2008 should have made it farther because, like 2006, it was easy to describe to the Non-FIRST audience. Also I thought it was more high paced.

Touche

I enjoyed 2008 very much, since it was very easy to explain, very interesting and challenging concept, and was just overall excellent. It made me very sadface when it was gone, but I since I cant really vote to keep it alive, I couldn't keep it alive.
*shrugs*

EricLeifermann 09-06-2009 11:31

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sgreco27 (Post 862728)
I have to agree here, 2008 is one of the most underrated games. I think it's mostly because people thought the no defense thing took out too much strategy. The other reason I think people didn't like it is because of G22, which I had no problem with, but a bunch of teams did apparently. 2008 was definitley a great game to watch.

I disagree. I thought, that once you understood the game well enough that is, that it was really boring to watch. I know some people are going to quote the finals on Einstein and Qf4.1 or something like that from IRI that year but I've seen them all and yea they were really good matches but i still found them to be rather boring. The most exciting part of the game was watching teams try and launch a ball at the end of the match, and not every team could launch balls so it didn't happen every match.

Elgin Clock 09-06-2009 14:20

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
I'd like to know how many people are voting off games they never competed in personally & why?

Just wondering.

EricH 09-06-2009 14:33

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elgin Clock (Post 862923)
I'd like to know how many people are voting off games they never competed in personally & why?

Just wondering.

At some point, you'd have to... or vote off your favorite games. Just because there are lots of people here that weren't around for the early 90's games. I only started watching around 1998, and that was watching the build. Started watching the games the next year, when the West Coast finally got a regional.

BTW, when is Lunacy going to enter and either get shot down or win the whole thing?

(And I think the reason 2000 went so fast is because people thought it was the 4v0...)

ATannahill 09-06-2009 14:39

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Probably because if people didn't than few people would still be voting and the games would mostly be voted off in backwards order.

edit: Eric beat me

sgreco 09-06-2009 15:06

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elgin Clock (Post 862923)
I'd like to know how many people are voting off games they never competed in personally & why?

Just wondering.

I peronally have been looking up the games online and watching youtube videos and such. I have a decent grasp for the games, but the only ones I've voted for are 2000 and then 2002 when 2000 went out, then 2006 when 2002 went out.(2002 and 2000) being games I never saw live. I do admit it is hard to vote for games you haven't seen, but if we only did this with people that had been involved in all of the games, we probably wouldn't have too many people voting.

Travis Hoffman 09-06-2009 15:34

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Perhaps we should go the American Idol route with the "judge's save" and have a separate poll to let one year's game back into the main poll, voting for which game you want to keep.

Schnabel 10-06-2009 03:05

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman (Post 862940)
Perhaps we should go the American Idol route with the "judge's save" and have a separate poll to let one year's game back into the main poll, voting for which game you want to keep.

I think this would be awesome! It would be interesting to see what would be voted back in, a game that was cut at the beginning, or a game recently cut.

To add more fun to this, it would be awesome if your rookie year listed determined how far back you were allowed to vote a game back in, that way you had to experience the game in order to save it. This would take forever to do though. If time only weren't a factor, everything would be done.

EricLeifermann 10-06-2009 10:21

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Schnabel (Post 863015)
I think this would be awesome! It would be interesting to see what would be voted back in, a game that was cut at the beginning, or a game recently cut.

To add more fun to this, it would be awesome if your rookie year listed determined how far back you were allowed to vote a game back in, that way you had to experience the game in order to save it. This would take forever to do though. If time only weren't a factor, everything would be done.

You can change your rookie year, i know that people will probably know if you say you've been around since 92 but what about people who say their rookie year is the first time they ever saw a regional? Does that qualify as a rookie or does that just make them a spectator and their real rookie year is the 1st year they were on an actual FRC team?

Molten 10-06-2009 14:20

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
I don't like the idea of bringing them back. It's taken us this long to get down to 4. Besides, this is Survivor not Big Brother.

Elgin Clock 11-06-2009 12:22

Re: FIRST Game Survivor: Round 14 *Final Four*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elgin Clock (Post 862923)
I'd like to know how many people are voting off games they never competed in personally & why?

Quote:

Originally Posted by EricH (Post 862932)
At some point, you'd have to... or vote off your favorite games.

Or just not vote... :p


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi