Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

I know that this is not along the same lines at all - but I do want to offer a suggestion for those teams who look at us who build outside of our school with a bit of jealousy:

One type of Sponsor to consider is a realtor. We have build for the last two years in a shopping center, in an unrented building. The real estate company provides the power and water and we get keys to the site. When build season is over, we pack up and leave the place open.

The reason this works for us is that it gives us 100% freedom to come and go when we please. The only fallback is transportation for students and our location is generally close enough to the school to mitigate this.

We make it a point each year of having a build-site group that cleans up the space entirely. We fix broken roofing tiles, paint walls that are grungy, pull up old carpet if the realtor asks - we basically remodel the place. So far, each site (both of which were unrented for about a year before us) found renters that moved in the day after we left.

Originality in Sponsorship can get you a lot of places.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

We meet on Microsoft's campus in Redmond, WA.

As others have mentioned, there are pros and cons to this, though we feel the pros far outweight the cons and so we're very happy with the arrangement we have.

The good:
-- We have a fantastic group of mentors that attend most of the team meetings because they are already on campus and can come by after work with little difficulty. A giant lake separates Seattle from "the east side" and is crossed by only two very busy highways. If we were to ask our mentors to come to our home school, it might take them 90+ minutes to make that trip. The reverse commute is much faster.

-- During build season, our use of the tools and machines in the shop in our building is prioritized over the work of others. We get away with this because it's a prototyping lab, because two of our mentors are in charge of that lab and because few people actually use it regularly.

-- We have lots of space for work -- many conference rooms, a kitchen, a large atrium, and a pretty big work area in the shop. We don't have loads of storage on site, though.

-- We can work whenever we'd like outside of normal business hours; and even then, sometimes we can work with a smaller group during normal business hours if it's important that we do so. We do have to make sure we have an escort in the building with us, but we have loads of people who're willing to take that on for us; even folks that don't regularly work with the team but have an office in our building will vouch for us if nobody else can make it.

The bad:
-- We have to bring the entire team to the work site every day we meet. Most of our students live in a city and rely on public transit, so they don't have cars. Additionally, they often won't get home until 10pm or later, so we drive each of them directly to their homes. Some of our mentors will drive 75+ miles every day we have a meeting.

-- We have to feed everyone when we meet on weeknights. We're a big group, so the cost of food isn't insignificant, but keeping everyone in the building and assuring the mentors that they'll get something to eat helps make coming to meetings pleasant and productive.

-- We have to be invisible to regular workers; so we always have to clean up after ourselves and then some. It's a good practice, though, so it's not that much of an issue.

Our experience pretty closely echoes that of others. We don't have any professional machinists in our building, though, so we're on our own with all of the tools.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

33 builds out of the Chrysler Tech Center. It's always been a great experience, but the shop space is tight.

469 also has a corporate campus shop, but I can't remember the name (sorry Marjie!)

...it's interesting to see the collection of responses here.
One thing to consider is that each shop space has it's own individual pros/cons. I'm hesitant to accept any of these reasons as absolute, simply because it is a corporate shop space. Every school/district has their own rules just as every corporation has their own rules.

Is the purpose of this thread to decide whether to build on a corporate campus? Is is to understand potential issues with dealing with a corporation?

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Carolyn,

Thank you for the response. The purpose of this thread is to understand the benefits and challenges of working on a corporate environment. You bring a great point regards to the schools district policies.

Cheers,
Mark

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

We currently build in an unused warehouse owned by our amazing sponsors, Waterloo Gardens. It's a huge space pretty well suited to our activities (full practice field, 3-phase power, reasonable CAD/programming room). It's vacant so we don't get any more access to mentors or tools, and we don't know when it will sell. However, we have our own unlimited access. They cover the basic pipes-don't-freeze utilities, and we bring in heaters to survive build season. We pay for our own insurance, so there are no liability restrictions from our sponsors. They actually benefit, because the building isn't "vacant" for their insurance purposes. We don't recruit from a single school, so it's not inherently "off-site"/out of the way, but it isn't very centralized.


469 works at Android Industries.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Back in 2000, Team 341 started out as a single sponsor team, working out of a local corporate site, with several engineers and machinists to guide the process.

The ground-level mentors were great people but the students had very limited hands-on roles, due corporate liability concerns and further transportation issues kept younger students back at school. These issues combined with very limited student access hours to the site, made the students feel uninvolved in the construction and decision making process.

In 2003, after 3 seasons we decided to build independently in a school-based environment. It was the right decision for our particular organization. In our case the school site allowed us to build our own systematic process, which more closely matched the goals of our team. It took us years to develop this system, but we felt it was worth the effort.

Building in a high school woodshop has its obvious limitations and our lack of a practice space hurts us every February. But in the end, we have figured out ways to work around the limitations and develop a process that is both satisfying and rewarding for our students.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Oz_341,

You bring a great point regarding flexibility, also another point to consider is that if you partner with a company instead of just having the company just as a sponsor, is that you might be tied to their education strategy in which might not give you the flexibility to choose which competitions to participate.

In my opinion, the best scenario is having the school district support where no money from the district goes to the team, this shield the team from change of school board members or administration. The best support a school district can give is the facilities, and if the team can work it out so students from other schools can participate, that is a bonus.

Many schools now are part of PLTW and VEX is their strategic partner, giving students access to both VEX and BEST competition with a lower non-recurring cost for capital investment.

Cheers,
Mark.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

How is not accepting money an important shield, but accepting facilities is totally fine? (I ask as someone who had to move out of district facilities with no notice during build season, and has since moved 10 times in 4 years since then for much the same reason as those you list.) At least money you can save up; space you either have at a given time or don't? Trying to understand?

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

I definitely agree with Siri on this. You need to accept all well-intended resources whenever they are offered. I have seen very few instances where funds were offered without the purest of motivations.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Very good point. District facilities are usually available, at least for team meetings or make mobile where you put everything away when it is done.

The money comes from taxpayers, and there are many other "stakeholders" competing for the same given resources, what might be priority today, it might not be priority tomorrow.

I have seem many teams loose space at schools but they have been able to find an alternative without much drama, but when a school was giving $5,000 to a team and had to cut back....well go to a school board meeting and you will see.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

While I'm sure these grants are limited in availability, NASA and others do have 'hardship grants' to help out. I feel for teams who are put in situations like this.

I think the bottom line should be, graciously take as much as you can get (both facilities and money) and be ready to act quickly should you lose either.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Coming from a team that has lost both money and space without notice more than once, space can certainly be harder. (I personally haven't experienced "district facilities are usually available" since Aim High.) I agree with Al and dcarr, take the money when it's offered, and have a backup. The nice thing about money is that it keeps. Don't live hand to mouth, and sponsor drop outs can be dealt with. Take the space too if you can, but understand that it's much harder to have contingency build space ready than it is to keep money in the bank. Many districts are willing to offer space. Many aren't. Check the old threads here for plenty of examples of lost build space and nomadic teams.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Dcarr,

Thank you for the post, I think we will be seeing in the near future many more team in hardship due to loss of money rather than loss of space due to the economy, obviously that is a personal opinion.

I am currently working with an organization that is sponsoring a robotics team and what we are trying to figure out is a "step program" where every year we give less money, so that we help the team begin thinking on ways to "be ready to act quickly". I agree that take as much as you can, but my caveat is that have a plan to become self-sufficient by a certain period specially on the money side, since in the facility side, worst comes to worst we can always work in the garage of somebody, while on the financial side if we don't get the money the teams usually fold unless a brave soul decides to take a "loan out" in which I highly do not recommend. I have seem mentors put it on credit card in the hope for getting reimbursed in the future.

From a group of 10 teams, usually I have less than 4 teams doing summer camps to raise money for their teams.

Cheers,
Mark.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

Small correction, probably not that important to the CD community, but for OCD purposes:
Just checked with my 469 friends. Their new 2013 shop space is hosted by Camau, in Royal Oak, MI.

Re: Corporate Campus Sponsored Teams.
 

In the spirit of OCD, it's Comau.