Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77930)

R.C. 24-07-2009 11:50

NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Hey CD,

Here is the site:

http://cad.team1323.com

Since I started FIRST back in the summer of 8th grade I’ve been collecting parts and learning CAD. I know there are many people that have CAD saved up from over the years. So a while back I started thinking to myself. There has to be better way to organize and allow people to share CAD. I wanted something more open source and available to community. The current CAD sites are fine, but I wanted a blend. For example:

You can only upload files to 3d Content Central. Autodesk’s FIRSTBASE wants a username and a mentor has to register for your team; FIRSTBASE also only supports inventor. I don’t want to knit pick at the other awesome sites out there. So for the past five months I’ve been zipping and organizing parts with the help of:


-Jeff From 801
-Sean From 1771
-Akash From 11
-Marie Planchard from Solidworks
-Special Thanks to Greg Marra for helping with site issues

The main goal of this is to make a central place for CAD. It currently has about 235 parts on there. I am trying to help teams that have never done CAD and need to find parts easily. Or people that are tired of saving files of basic CAD Parts. Before posting, please go through the site.

Another option I wanted to give CD is that whenever there is a CAD pic posted on CD media, people ask.” Can you PM the file to me or email it.” Most of the time the creator would love to share and has no place to make it available to the public. I have a category made for CD members and it could be a place where people could upload random drawings that do not pertain to the site’s current categories. Like cool sprockets made or random manipulators for offseason.

The advantages of the new CAD library:
-Most files have textures on them
-The name links to the place to buy the parts (need help to find the ones that don’t have links)
-Multi-Format Support
-You can Request Parts to be made
-Has over 200+ Parts
-Anyone can upload parts to the library
How can CD help? There are a ton of parts still out there.
-Please contribute parts if you can.
-If there is no link to a part but you know where it can be found, please use the contact page and send an email telling where it can be found.
-If there are inconsisties in a part, please report them.
-If anyone would like to take drawings and add more textures or make the weight more accurate, please do so.
-last but not least, thanks CD for encouraging teams and individuals to succeed.

I and the team of 1323 tried to give credit those people that have parts uploaded on the site, we do not by any means want to offend anyone by taking a drawing and labeling it someone elses. I have been collecting parts personally and editing them over the years. I may have made a mistake. If Drawings were labeled the contributor if it was fixed, modified or done better. If there are any disputes, please go to the contact page of the site and report it.

Thanks,

-RC

sgreco 24-07-2009 12:03

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Wow. This is awesome. It's great to see people doing things like this.

I have some parts I can contribute, I'll make sure to do it when I renew my CAD liscense.

Would you want things like entire swerve modules or six wheels skids and such on the library? because I have a few of those too.

Great job though, this is really awesome.

ATannahill 24-07-2009 12:14

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
What versions are these good with? are they still able to work in Autodesks from past years or do you need the new stuff?

sgreco 24-07-2009 12:16

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867716)
What versions are these good with? are they still able to work in Autodesks from past years or do you need the new stuff?

I was wondering the same thing, even if they're 09's, the STEPs should still work for older versions like 08 or 07.

Madison 24-07-2009 12:19

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
It's probably not a bad idea, when possible, to save the parts so they're compatible with software that's not on the bleeding edge. :)

AndyB 24-07-2009 12:21

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
RC, this is awesome. I've been using firstcadlibrary for the longest time but I love the fact that this site is more of a collaboration. I'll be sure to upload parts when I have them. I hope this site gets even bigger.

Not a huge fan of the iframes though. I'd rather have the page just scroll. But that's hardly a complaint at this point. I'm very thankful that someone went ahead and did something like this. Great job!

Andrew Schreiber 24-07-2009 12:24

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyB (Post 867719)
RC, this is awesome. I've been using firstcadlibrary for the longest time but I love the fact that this site is more of a collaboration. I'll be sure to upload parts when I have them. I hope this site gets even bigger.

Not a huge fan of the iframes though. I'd rather have the page just scroll. But that's hardly a complaint at this point. I'm very thankful that someone went ahead and did something like this. Great job!

Seconding the dislike of iFrames.

acidrain2012 24-07-2009 12:25

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Wow. Thanks a lot, this will help our team, especially since we don't usually get very much done on cad. Good job on the site too! Keep the parts coming!

Jeff 801 24-07-2009 12:27

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867716)
What versions are these good with? are they still able to work in Autodesks from past years or do you need the new stuff?

It depends on the part Most of the electronics and pneumatics and some of the wheels are Inventor 2008 but everything else is Inventor 2009. In other words if you use Inventor 2009 you will be fine

And for Solidworks everything is 2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by sgreco (Post 867717)
I was wondering the same thing, even if they're 09's, the STEPs should still work for older versions like 08 or 07.

That is correct the STEPs and IGES will work with older versions

R.C. 24-07-2009 12:43

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sgreco (Post 867714)
Wow. This is awesome. It's great to see people doing things like this.

I have some parts I can contribute, I'll make sure to do it when I renew my CAD liscense.

Would you want things like entire swerve modules or six wheels skids and such on the library? because I have a few of those too.

Great job though, this is really awesome.

I would love the parts, thank you. Contact me through the Contact/Request Section.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867716)
What versions are these good with? are they still able to work in Autodesks from past years or do you need the new stuff?

I believe:

-Autodesk 2009
-Solidworks 2009

-RC

Akash Rastogi 24-07-2009 12:50

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyB (Post 867719)
collaboration

That's pretty much the basis of a lot of the things we do now. Sharing designs is one of our priorities and we want to allow others the ability to better share their knowledge and designs.

We'll be showing some other cool things later on in the year.

Things like this is just one reason why RC was the first person I talked to about EWCP. Thanks a lot for giving back to FIRST and CD man.

Jared Russell 24-07-2009 13:55

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Well done guys, thanks!

The parts look great, and I love the "open source" aspect of the library. A few thoughts:

1. The site looks clean and professional, but I'd do away with the frames and just let people scroll.

2. Are you at some point planning a more automated way of uploading content? I think that even without a system for this, the site is going to rock, but a nice interface would put it over the top.

I've sent the link on to my teams' CAD folks - hopefully they will be able to contribute as next season approaches!

AdamHeard 24-07-2009 16:58

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rc_cola1323 (Post 867724)
I would love the parts, thank you. Contact me through the Contact/Request Section.



I believe:

-Autodesk 2009
-Solidworks 2009

-RC

It'd be really nice if you could save them a few years back.

Also, kind of nitpicky, but it'd be nice for electronics/pneumatics/etc... if you made "dumbed down" models that just have the critical dimensions and mounting holes. This will let teams with lesser equipment model their electronics without the lag those fully featured models will create.

Jeff 801 24-07-2009 17:07

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 867750)
It'd be really nice if you could save them a few years back.

Sadly we can't save them in an older version of inventor because the models were created in 2008 or 2009 depending on the part and there is no way currently to save to an older version. Because of that we have uploaded STEP and IGES models.

AdamHeard 24-07-2009 17:33

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff 801 (Post 867751)
Sadly we can't save them in an older version of inventor because the models were created in 2008 or 2009 depending on the part and there is no way currently to save to an older version. Because of that we have uploaded STEP and IGES models.

You can open the .step and .iges files and save them as older version with an older version of the software.

You could ask the user to do this, but a site such as this should really be appealing to the user in my opinion.

ATannahill 24-07-2009 17:41

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 867754)
You can open the .step and .iges files and save them as older version with an older version of the software.

You could ask the user to do this, but a site such as this should really be appealing to the user in my opinion.

Sorry, I only have Inventor 2009, what do you have? It is ridiculous to ask them to make different copies for each different version, that is more work and more space used.

R.C. 24-07-2009 17:54

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared341 (Post 867733)
Well done guys, thanks!

The parts look great, and I love the "open source" aspect of the library. A few thoughts:

1. The site looks clean and professional, but I'd do away with the frames and just let people scroll.

2. Are you at some point planning a more automated way of uploading content? I think that even without a system for this, the site is going to rock, but a nice interface would put it over the top.

I've sent the link on to my teams' CAD folks - hopefully they will be able to contribute as next season approaches!

I can't wait for the CAD, as for automation. I have a ftp setup. I am open to options:

-I can setup up an FTP which has a login
-Send me the files through email
-Or if there is another way?

I will work on the frames and try different things to move away from them. Just while making the site, frames worked pretty well.

Thanks,

-RC

Cory 24-07-2009 18:25

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867755)
Sorry, I only have Inventor 2009, what do you have? It is ridiculous to ask them to make different copies for each different version, that is more work and more space used.

If the creators expect this to be something the entire community will utilize, then it's not ridiculous to expect them to make different copies, it's what they'll have to do.

This is why FIRST CAD Library is good. You may not get a native file that you can easily modify, but you'll get an accurate file that you can bring into any CAD program, whether your software is 15 years old or brand new.

Personally I don't care about the file type. I'd be happy with IGES, STEP, or Parasolid files for everything, so long as they're accurately modeled. I don't see why I'd ever want the feature tree from Solidworks, for example, of a COTS/KOP item.

AdamHeard 24-07-2009 20:02

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867755)
Sorry, I only have Inventor 2009, what do you have? It is ridiculous to ask them to make different copies for each different version, that is more work and more space used.

They would actually only need to make one file per each software, it would just be an older one.

I still have inventor 2008, I only keep it for working with people who have inventor, I'll probably eventually upgrade. My team will also being using solidworks 2008 until near the start of the season. There are various logistical reasons for this.

There are some teams out there still using software several years old... I know they can get new software, they might know, but it doesn't really matter.

With just about any service or product, you have to think about the user. Like with webpages, if you're site looks awful with internet explorer, you can't just say it's the users fault for being stupid and using internet explorer.

And for reference, FirstCADlibrary uses inventor 6-7 or so If I remember right.

Andrew Schreiber 24-07-2009 20:17

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 867755)
Sorry, I only have Inventor 2009, what do you have? It is ridiculous to ask them to make different copies for each different version, that is more work and more space used.

Space is cheap though if they decide to offer multiple version they will need a better method of selecting the various file types.

R.C. 25-07-2009 00:11

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Just to clear up the issue with the File Format.

We (the creators) will not be saving the file formats lower. I will just go ahead and apologize. There is no way to make everyone happy. Jeff and I talked at great lengths to make it easy for everyone. That is why we tried to accommodate everyone by making a STEP and IGES copy of everything.

Just to make sure stuff worked, I opened up a STEP file with Solidworks 2007 and it worked. If you want all "THE FEATURE TREE" data, please go ahead and redraw the parts in an older version. It is really not that hard to drag and drop an IGES or STEP into your CAD program.

-RC

mplanchard 26-07-2009 00:26

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
RC

This is a great library - you have really done a lot of work. For the parts you created in native SolidWorks format, you can load them to
www.3DContentCentral.com - then they will be able to be downloaded in SolidWorks 2007, 2008, 2009. You will also be able to download them in previous versions of other cad software, both 3d and 2d formats. This is important because many teams do not upgrade each year. As model files get big, you can use configurations to make a simplified version.

I created tags for 2009kop, 2008kop, FRC, supplier name, part number, for some of the parts I created last year making it easier to find what you are looking for. Searching becomes more challanging as the part library gets bigger.

Regards,
Marie

MMassoni11 26-07-2009 01:50

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Excellent! This is a wonderful site, and I'll definitely need to use some of those electrical models once I get through the extensive tutorials. I'll also try to contribute once I get better at solidworks! :D

Ed Sparks 07-08-2009 20:42

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 867759)
..... This is why FIRST CAD Library is good. You may not get a native file that you can easily modify, but you'll get an accurate file that you can bring into any CAD program, whether your software is 15 years old or brand new.


Hey! You guys keep this thing going and I might be able to retire! :)

I struggled for a long time about opening up the FCL to outside contributions and decided against it so I'm glad to see another sites pick this up. Cory makes the ultimate point in my opinion. You need to find a way to maintain the integrity of your content. There's nothing more frustrating than to cut a part based on an external model's dimensions only to find out that it wasn't accurate enough. Not that everything on FCL is perfect but I put a lot of effort in accuracy. Know too that even the generic model formats have trouble importing into older versions of CAD SW. I've had trouble in the past using AndyMark STEP files in my older versions of Inventor so I often just redraw them. This doesn't seem to be the case going the other way. I use Inventor 6 not only to keep the Inventor folks happy but the exported generic formats seem to be universally understood. FCL is not behind the times in my choice of development CAD software, it's just the way I choose to keep everything as universally compatable as I can. Be sure the posted work is origional and not copies of others work on other sites. It's a little anoying to see your work posted with someone else taking credit (or ask them if it's OK). There are several FCL models already posted on this new site and I didn't put them there. Also, IMHO, it's also not too cool to "tweak" or "Collect" someone elses work and call it you own. You should give the origional author credit. Another suggestion is to not worry too much about textures and other such details. These things are easily added, besides the generic formats don't usually contain this info. Keep your website as simple as you can (slow = frustration). Use high contrast in your color selections. Dark gray on Black is tough on old guys like me. :D

I'll be glad to help you in any way I can..........

R.C. 07-08-2009 22:31

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Nice to hear from you ED and...

Quote:

Originally Posted by rc_cola1323 (Post 867724)
I and the team of 1323 tried to give credit those people that have parts uploaded on the site, we do not by any means want to offend anyone by taking a drawing and labeling it someone elses. I have been collecting parts personally and editing them over the years. I may have made a mistake. If Drawings were labeled the contributor if it was fixed, modified or done better. If there are any disputes, please go to the contact page of the site and report it.

-RC

Ed, if they're are any parts that are purely yours, just please report them via the contact page. I know I have parts saved for the past 4 years and I personally used the FIRST CAD library. I don't put FCL in front of my parts gotten from the First CAD library or from 3d in front of 3d content central parts, after 4 years of Part making/collecting, people tend to forget the source. I would rather have people email me " Hey, I think this part was orginally so and so's, can you take a look at it." Instead of posting here. That is why there is a contact page for this issue.

Also NEW WHEELS are up aka Banebots. Cad Library updates will be here.

Thank you Ed,

-RC

lynca 08-08-2009 11:26

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Would it be possible to Save the Solidworks files in an older format? My 08-09 version of Solidworks does not accept Future versions of solidworks files.

I would hope solidworks has a way of saving files in a version independent format.

R.C. 08-08-2009 16:46

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lynca (Post 869656)
Would it be possible to Save the Solidworks files in an older format? My 08-09 version of Solidworks does not accept Future versions of solidworks files.

I would hope solidworks has a way of saving files in a version independent format.

It doesn't allow you to "SAVE" in past versions, but Marie gave me another option. You or I could upload the file to 3d Content Central and from there you can redownload it in "2007 Version". Or you can just drag and drop the STEP or IGES format into solidworks. If you want the featuretree data, you can enable featureworks.

Hope that helps,

-RC

Ed Sparks 08-08-2009 18:56

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rc_cola1323 (Post 869619)
Ed, if they're are any parts that are purely yours, just please report them via the contact page. I know I have parts saved for the past 4 years and I personally used the FIRST CAD library. I don't put FCL in front of my parts gotten from the First CAD library or from 3d in front of 3d content central parts, after 4 years of Part making/collecting, people tend to forget the source. I would rather have people email me " Hey, I think this part was orginally so and so's, can you take a look at it." Instead of posting here. That is why there is a contact page for this issue.

Let me try this again ........

If you read a really good novel but you just didn't like the ending so much, I doubt the origional writer (or publisher) would like it if you republished the novel with the last 2 chapters changed to give it your new ending. In fact, I'd be willing to bet it would be financially painful.

I'm not sure why the burden is put on the origional publisher to report ownership of posted models. It's clear to me that many of your models originated from the FCL without giving credit to FCL. The only other library with permission to repost my content in any form is 3DContentCentral.com.

You should limit your content on your website to your origional work and not "collect" or "tweek" others work. If you don't like a model on the FCL, just model a different version ........ from the beginning. It doesn't make a lot of sense for me to invest the time and money into FCL just to have others claim it. FCL models are free to all teams to use as they see fit for developing FRC designs but they should not be part of other website content unless they have an agreement with FCL.

There's clearly room for all of us. Just post stuff that's "purely" your own.

Just say'n ......... :cool:

R.C. 08-08-2009 20:03

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Sparks (Post 869707)
Let me try this again ........

If you read a really good novel but you just didn't like the ending so much, I doubt the origional writer (or publisher) would like it if you republished the novel with the last 2 chapters changed to give it your new ending. In fact, I'd be willing to bet it would be financially painful.

I'm not sure why the burden is put on the origional publisher to report ownership of posted models. It's clear to me that many of your models originated from the FCL without giving credit to FCL. The only other library with permission to repost my content in any form is 3DContentCentral.com.

You should limit your content on your website to your origional work and not "collect" or "tweek" others work. If you don't like a model on the FCL, just model a different version ........ from the beginning. It doesn't make a lot of sense for me to invest the time and money into FCL just to have others claim it. FCL models are free to all teams to use as they see fit for developing FRC designs but they should not be part of other website content unless they have an agreement with FCL.

There's clearly room for all of us. Just post stuff that's "purely" your own.

Just say'n ......... :cool:

Ed, Just please email me a list of parts you want removed. I do not remember which parts are yours, when we created the new library. We tried to stay away from your parts as much as possible and did not download any when we were working on the site, we did not steal or take any of your parts on purpose. That is why we don't have an extrusion section at the moment. Most of our content is different and we tried to stay original as possible. I am sorry if the Library has offended you, I would love to clear up any misunderstandings and remove/edit any drawings.

Whichever parts are bugging you, just please send me an email. I am going through and looking at the library and there are a few models that I may see being yours, not many. Most parts were drawn from scratch and we tried to keep it to our own drawings. When zipping and spending time uploading parts I knew I was going to make a mistake. SO THERE IS A REPORT SECTION TO THE SITE, I Kindly ask you to report files and they will be removed.

-RC

P.s. Yes, I do understand your comment, I am not ignoring it. I would love to talk about this more in depth via AIM or IIRC. Thanks Ed.

mplanchard 12-08-2009 09:36

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Hi RC

Please contact me in a private message and I can assist you.

You want to keep the parts in native SolidWorks format for new technologies. It is true that for the First competition you need to make a robot in 6 weeks so you dont worry so much about design iterations.

However, look at NI Soft Motion for SolidWorks a new technology http://www.ni.com/pdf/manuals/372876a.pdf
to simulate your robot with actual motion profiles that allow you to simulate mechanical dynamics, including mass and friction effects, cycle times, and individual component performance before specifying a single physical part and connecting it to an actual control algorithm. From SolidWorks models and SolidWorks Motion parameters, information is transfered into Lab VIEW.

Also SolidWorks works with Microsoft Robotics Studio by exporting collada format.

You don't know what the future will bring but you can expect their will be change. Marie

R.C. 12-08-2009 11:23

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Wow, this is amazing cool. I will for sure have to play around with this.

Thank you Marie and I will be contacting you soon.

-RC

AndyB 12-08-2009 16:24

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Sparks (Post 869707)
If you read a really good novel but you just didn't like the ending so much, I doubt the origional writer (or publisher) would like it if you republished the novel with the last 2 chapters changed to give it your new ending. In fact, I'd be willing to bet it would be financially painful.

With all due respect, there's a difference between a novel and CAD model. One is a work of creativity and the other is a work of science. Whether or not a novel is "bad" is a matter of opinion. CAD files are either correct, or they aren't.

However, I completely agree that all creators should be recognized and that credit should be given where credit is due. I don't think it's right for someone to take a part from a site like FCL, make a small change, and post it as their original work. Even if it's a matter of using one of FCL's iParts in your released assembly.

I love FCL and have used it (and referred others to it) faithfully over the past 5 years. Thank you for your hard work. I share your concerns about accuracy and precision of publicly available models. And it's not really any of my business, but I'd suggest you add a note to FCL with a request that none of your work be republished without your permission.

-----

RC,
I did my best to cite all original authors when submitting parts to you. Here is a more organized list:

6" AndyMark Mecanum Wheels: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
6" AndyMark Plaction Wheel: 100% original.
BaneBots Wheels: 100% original.
4" Plastic Omni Wheel: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
6" Plastic Omni Wheel: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
8" Plastic Omni Wheel: Modified AndyMark models. Textures, materials, and assembly by me. Modifications consisted of adding webbing to the main structure.
AndyMark Performance Wheels: 100% original.

Good luck in maintaining MadTown CAD Library. I'll continue to submit in the future. However, I would love to see some set of standards in place for anyone who is submitting their work. Let me know if you want some help, or need an opinion.

Akash Rastogi 12-08-2009 16:32

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
RC,

If during build season teams would like to share models of their mechanism designs or different custom parts, how often would you be able to update the website and how would such parts be organized on the site?

Akash

R.C. 12-08-2009 16:50

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyB (Post 870210)
With all due respect, there's a difference between a novel and CAD model. One is a work of creativity and the other is a work of science. Whether or not a novel is "bad" is a matter of opinion. CAD files are either correct, or they aren't.

However, I completely agree that all creators should be recognized and that credit should be given where credit is due. I don't think it's right for someone to take a part from a site like FCL, make a small change, and post it as their original work. Even if it's a matter of using one of FCL's iParts in your released assembly.

I love FCL and have used it (and referred others to it) faithfully over the past 5 years. Thank you for your hard work. I share your concerns about accuracy and precision of publicly available models. And it's not really any of my business, but I'd suggest you add a note to FCL with a request that none of your work be republished without your permission.

-----

RC,
I did my best to cite all original authors when submitting parts to you. Here is a more organized list:

6" AndyMark Mecanum Wheels: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
6" AndyMark Plaction Wheel: 100% original.
BaneBots Wheels: 100% original.
4" Plastic Omni Wheel: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
6" Plastic Omni Wheel: Used original models from AndyMark. Textures, materials, and assembly by me.
8" Plastic Omni Wheel: Modified AndyMark models. Textures, materials, and assembly by me. Modifications consisted of adding webbing to the main structure.
AndyMark Performance Wheels: 100% original.

Good luck in maintaining MadTown CAD Library. I'll continue to submit in the future. However, I would love to see some set of standards in place for anyone who is submitting their work. Let me know if you want some help, or need an opinion.

Yep Andy you did, I sent Andy Baker an email asking him whether it would be ok or not. So I'll update accordingly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 870211)
RC,

If during build season teams would like to share models of their mechanism designs or different custom parts, how often would you be able to update the website and how would such parts be organized on the site?

Akash

There is a section for it, I have an FTP setup and they can upload parts and within a day or two it will be updated.

Either Individuals can have their own section or it can be a team section. If anyone would like more info. Just send me a PM or email me here.

-RC

Akash Rastogi 12-08-2009 16:53

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rc_cola1323 (Post 870213)
There is a section for it, I have an FTP setup and they can upload parts and within a day or two it will be updated.

Either Individuals can have their own section or it can be a team section. If anyone would like more info. Just send me a PM or email me here.

-RC

That sounds awesome! Are there specific things that you would already have categories made for? I had the idea of adding a category for "Custom Parts" and then subcategories for "Wheels" "Frames" "Manipulators" Whenever I see pictures of previous designs it always helps me out when making new designs.

R.C. 12-08-2009 16:56

Re: NEW 200+ Part Community CAD Library
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 870215)
That sounds awesome! Are there specific things that you would already have categories made for? I had the idea of adding a category for "Custom Parts" and then subcategories for "Wheels" "Frames" "Manipulators" Whenever I see pictures of previous designs it always helps me out when making new designs.

It would up to Chief Delphi. I could make a section for Teams and one for Custom.

Custom would consist of "FRAMES""WHEELS""MANIPULATORS"ETC.

Teams would be the CAD of homegrown parts made by teams.

-RC


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi