Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

I'm pretty sure you're correct. In the very least, teams would have to travel long distances to compete in FTC competitions if they live in a remote location. For example, Alaskan VRC teams could do a youtube video of their Skills challenge submission, yet they probably wouldn't even bother flying to a state competition due to the large distances. I'm also pretty sure that in the more rural parts of the country there are few FTC competitions (though that's based on conjecture and I don't have time to look it up atm). I'd say it's more of a VRC pro than an FTC con.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

There are people around who are attempting to introduce and are introducing both competitions to areas. Both are developing and expanding. The programs, themselves, are creative in their recruitment and their impact.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

I was thinking more of MI, and the early years of FTC as FTC when there wasn't a single competition west of the Mississippi (which made L.A. residents unhappy...) Those aren't rural, yet didn't have a single competition. I think that part has changed, but still, it was not the best move, and many teams from those areas do VRC instead.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

As long as you stay around the business of robotics and technology, there will be change. It is at the core of their very nature. The trick is to appreciate that aspect of it, respect it, and remain flexible as the programs develop and grow. Who knows what will happen 2 years, 4 years, 10 years down the road. The goals and planning that are imperative to successful programs and their clientele, will help with that development and growth.

What we do know, and becomes readily apparent, is that some of the best and brightest of the FIRST program are involved in the success of VRC. Experience is a valuable asset.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

What student's robotics experience has money as no object, though? My FTC experience was very much limited by money; if my FTC budget of $800 would have just gotten me the KoP for Tetrix, and I couldn't machine anything as I was out of money, I would have a much worse experience. If money is irrelavent, you'd be able to afford FRC and the point would be moot really.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

The members of my team wanted to do FTC because of the limited team size, not because they didn't want to do the big robots. Sure, we didn't have the money to do FRC, but we also didn't look for it. Since the team was only going to have four members, they didn't want to compete with teams of unlimited size. And no, there's no FRC team within 50 miles of us that they could have joined, we'd've had to start our own. If the team can look for and find sponsors, then budget is not the overriding item.

BTW, based on the budgetary number in another thread, $800 would be substantially less than is needed for a VEX competition as well.

If you are limiting your ideas based on money, then you are limiting your ideas...

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

I did Vex for $800 by getting the Kit for $200, $100ish on used regulation batteries and programming, then planned the rest of the robot very carfefully and ordered no more parts than needed. The robot didn't exactly "work" but it could be done. The one event I planned to intend was within driving distance. Not only could I not build the same robot with the Tetrix kit (no tank treads), it would definitely not be possible with just the Kit of Parts and a hacksaw.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

I never said "money is no object". The intent of the thread was to find out why else people like one program or the other and the Pro/Con list is meant to return it to that intent rather than squabbling over opinions like little kids.

Money is never irrelevant. In the professional world (and STEM funding world), reasonable cost is usually not the limiting factor when deciding whether or not to fund a program. Since reasonable is a relative term, it really depends on the situation and how well one is able to communicate the justifications and benefits of the cost.

For example, somehow most communities are still able to justify to themselves that they should pay for multi-million dollar high school football stadiums that pay for themselves over a 50 year lifespan. To us this may seem ludicrous, but in reality it just means that those communities haven't seen the immediate benefits or return on investment of FIRST or VEX.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

So there are Pro's and Con's for both sides. As with everything in life there are trade offs, you need to look at them and make a decision.

I run a 503(c) to bring robotics to as many students/roboteers as possible. So I come to the table looking for the biggest bang for the dollars that I have. If I can get the same approximate experience for lots less, I'm going to go for the lower cost.

My biggest complaint is that people take catch phrases like "crappy plastic VEX gears" "much stronger metal" and make that into the single reason to change. One of the early posters pointed back to the original "Why we are changing FTC" blog entries and there were concepts bandied about in those entries that the Tetrix materials were significantly better than Vex. We've seen proof that's not the case, but people continue to natter on like it continues to be factual.

You must be new around here :rolleyes:

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

JVN's major pet peeve in ALL aspects of his life:
If you repeat a lie enough times it starts to become the truth. Not enough people do their own factual comparisons but instead they just repeat generalizations not grounded in quantitative analysis.

-John

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

FIRST's decision to go with Pitsco sealed the deal with me. Never have liked them much.


The support from IFI is second to none.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

Oddly enough, money was the deciding factor for us picking FTC... because Girl Scouts only sponsors us for FIRST.

Personally, I'm reserving judgment on the whole FTC vs VRC matter until I see how both progress in the next few years. That will make more difference to me than the technical specifications of either kit.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

With a tip of the hat to John Godfrey Saxe and a wag of the finger to folks who might have a conscious or unconscious tendency to view this discussion as a competition instead of a coopetition; let me offer this:

"It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind
...
They conclude that the elephant is like a wall, snake, spear, tree, fan or rope, depending upon where they touch. They have a heated debate that does not come to physical violence. But in Saxe's version, the conflict is never resolved.
...
So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!"

Maybe we aren't quite as divided as the six blind men of the story/poem; but I think we could do a better job of collaborating and of inspiring each other. I suggest that two successful programs serving a market that is a long, long way from saturated, is better than one.

Blake ;)

PS: This material is an excerpt from this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

Are you inviting JVN to do pull-ups using VEX parts?

Zero for our six VRC teams. Many also have zero, some have one or two, very few have a whole bunch.

What was most disappointing about the transition was the truly ungracious way in which FIRST pursued it. Tetrix was introduced not only with subtle "lies" like the ones mentioned before, but even through making fun of the VEX Robotics kit (in one blog post, it was even called a toy). I can't imagine how much this offends long-time FIRST-supporting IFI employees, like JVN, Jason Morella, Karthik, and countless others, along with teams which thought their hard work was viewed as real engineering.

The past is the past though. Looking at the replies, I think the current FTC has a long way to go until it catches up with VRC.

Re: [FTC]: FVC (Vex) VS. FTC (Tetrix)
 

Rereading those posts now it's really a lot more brutal than I imagined. "The new kit is a true robotics prototyping platform" and other cheap veiled shots like that. I was particularly upset with the apparent lack of communication with IFI that they were switching platforms, and that they decided to drop Vex before having a better alternate available (and they still don't). Oh well, I guess it got me into FRC ?