![]() |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
I absolutely love this thread! Lack of proper grammar on the Internet is one of my biggest pet peeves.
As someone posted before me, I highly suggest investing in a copy of The Elements of Style. An incredibly useful little book, it contains information on some basic, but often confusing rules of grammar, as well as a list of misused words and expressions, such as "couldn't care less," further/farther, affect/effect, and tons of other useful tips. As my AP English Language and Composition teacher would always say, "The main point of Elements of Style can be summarized as four words: Make every word count!" |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
PS: I learned this point reading a web page design book. Designers were advised to "Remove unnecessary words." The author then reinforced this point by advising designers to "Remove words." |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
How one communicates when giving directions may be a little different that telling a story. How one gives instructions for solving a math problem may be a little different from describing a current event. Language and how it is used - matters. I like Andy Baker's advice to be concise when posting in Chief Delphi. I also like to read posts that are well written and thoughtful. If that includes a couple of adjectives then that's ok by me. |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
Another thread to be noted is Andrew Schreiber's. "You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Rick TYler again." lol @ Rick's comment. |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
ChrisH |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
Is this a Dodgsonian contraction, akin to brillig and slithy? Maybe it came out when Chris was thinking necessary and gnarly, at precisely the same time. :) |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
As a clarification to the eschew surplusage I would like to submit that we include posts in as well as words. Frivolous posts are just a general pain and there is no longer any reason to run up post counts. If something adds no value (in your opinion) to a conversation consider sending it as a PM to the person or group. By no means am I saying don't post, just my usual request of think before you post. Too often I see posts that read like, "Yes, they are right." I always question whether those posts are needed.
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
I will be editing out portions of that post in an attempt to have it more effectively say what I meant. Sorry for the miscommunication. |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
Quote:
|
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
I would like to expand upon what Andrew said to include CD media. Do not "grave dig" and post pictures from the past that do not have a reason to be posted. I don't care if you have a picture of people bowing down to me at the Florida Regional, that was eight months ago, there are few reasons to post a picture from that competition.
I am glad that your team created a new drive system/held a camp for little kids/helped out in the neighborhood, that is what makes FIRST teams so great. But please do not post 10 pictures on the portal page about it. If you want to share a multitude of pictures, than post one to CD media and attach the rest to a post in the discussion thread. |
Re: Use Of Punctuation In A Post And What Is Annoying or Confusing
I have never been able to understand why we [students] learn about general literature in English classes, yet we have yet to be taught basic grammar. It's disappointing, but I honestly learned more about English grammar in my Latin I (roman numeral) class than I had learned in my nine years of standard english up until that point (at least in terms of structural understanding). I've come to the conclusion that one doesn't truly understand one's own language until they have learned a foreign one.
Random tangent: I was talking with some friends of mine about foreign languages, and how it was wierd (and moderately annoying) that kids that moved to the district from another country would take a language class to learn the language of the country they had just left. My friend commented that it would be like us moving to France and taking English I. After a few seconds though I pointed out that we'd probably fail the class :) Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi