![]() |
What exactly is "Articulating"?
So the design my team is thinking of currently would cause the bumpers to go higher than 16 inches as it goes over the bump. It would probably place it around 17 inches. but when it becomes level again it would be back under 16". Would this be considered articulation? If so, if we created a contraption that would keep them under 16", would they still be considered articulating due to the fact that they are moving in relation to the center of the robot?
Just trying to decided on what to do. Any help would be greatly appreciated. :D -Rion |
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
<R07.a> is the part that applies to this design. But I can't tell if it would be legal... Quote:
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
R07a makes it illegal. Do the bumpers move up out of the bumper zone? Yes. Therefore illegal.
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
So another question. If the wheels of the robot articulate within the frame, but the frame remains in the shape of a regular polygon is that legal?
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
When the Q&A system comes live on wed have your team leader ask a question. Until then all of the responses are just speculation.
My interpretation of the intent of the rule is to make sure on flat ground there is only bumper to bumper contact. When you are climbing the ramp at roughly 45 degrees any robot with fixed bumpers within the zone will rise out of the bumper zone until they are on fixed ground again. But I would wait for the Q&A before making a design decision. |
Re: What exactly is "Articulating"?
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi