Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80089)

Austinmead 13-01-2010 11:26

Strategy
 
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???

viperred396 13-01-2010 12:04

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinmead (Post 898150)
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???


I dont understand what you are asking. Are you asking us to design your bot/bouncing ideas of of us/ or something else?

also your title really has nothing to do with your thread and this post probably be in the "General Forum"

Storm 2729 13-01-2010 17:15

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinmead (Post 898150)
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???

We were thinking that treads might not be so effective, and to instead utilize tank drive. We had used tank drive last year and its something that's easy to build and service.

cooldude8181 13-01-2010 17:19

Re: Strategy
 
My team doesn't like the idea of treads because we think that it will slow the bot down to much for them to actually be effective.

timytamy 13-01-2010 17:59

Re: Strategy
 
If you were planing to go over the bumps I would recomend threads as it will allow you to have traction along the whole of your base. However, when you turn with threads you drag over 90% of the threads. So if you plan to move fast the threads may not be a good option.

In saying that I could be completely wrong :confused:

Thanks,
timytamy

carbuff2228 13-01-2010 21:20

Re: Strategy
 
i think this year alot of team will go with mecanum

Lil' Lavery 13-01-2010 21:22

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cooldude8181 (Post 898388)
My team doesn't like the idea of treads because we think that it will slow the bot down to much for them to actually be effective.

Treads have no relation to the speed of the robot.

Michael Ogden 13-01-2010 21:29

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinmead (Post 898150)
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???

If your robot is offensive, ther is no need to go over the bumps.

carbuff2228 13-01-2010 21:40

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Ogden (Post 898591)
If your robot is offensive, ther is no need to go over the bumps.

Yeah there is in my opinion to be able to do end game if you have it and to score the ball if you dont have a long range shooter

Who? 13-01-2010 22:17

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinmead (Post 898150)
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???

personally i think you should exile the tread/track idea all together just for the sake of manuverability, with treads you wil have little to no turning capabilities on the carpet or whatever substance we will be driving on.

BrianCloutier 13-01-2010 23:23

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cooldude8181 (Post 898388)
My team doesn't like the idea of treads because we think that it will slow the bot down to much for them to actually be effective.

We had the same idea, we value being agile much more than being "tank-like"

carbuff2228 14-01-2010 13:52

Re: Strategy
 
yeah while you lose pushing power with manuverability you can easily get away from a defensive bot thats not manuverable

Daniel_LaFleur 14-01-2010 14:46

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Ogden (Post 898591)
If your robot is offensive, ther is no need to go over the bumps.

Don't be too sure about that ;)

KrakatoaCoo 15-01-2010 12:52

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinmead (Post 898150)
what do you guys think of this?
robot is offensive, a kicking mechanism....with treads to allow it to go over the bumps?
any other things i should add to the idea???

treads may not be that great on handling and speed......unless your team is willing to give that up for going over bumps........

my team is basing our new drive train on our 2006 robot, The Commander, which went over bumps like it was flat!

MrForbes 15-01-2010 13:04

Re: Strategy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Who? (Post 898654)
with treads you wil have little to no turning capabilities on the carpet or whatever substance we will be driving on.

Don't be so sure about that. I've seen some well designed treaded robots that can turn very well. You do have to design it right...and that generally means lots of rollers to support the tread, and having the height of each roller just right. Well done, tread type robots are very intimidating.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi