![]() |
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Quote:
|
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
This is a really cool idea and I would really like to see this.
i haven't read any rules that would stop this from being legal or true, so good luck to anyone who tries this! |
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Quote:
|
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Wow! This all sounds like some circus act- you know the one where acrobats make the upside-down pyramid on one person?
Anyway, I think a ramp-bot, if designed right, would work great. For those who worry that no one would be able to climb on you, keep in mind that most robots (I assume) are built to be able to climb up the 45 degree angle of the bumps. The ramp would just go slightly higher. Unless you have a ridiculously steep angle, I think it would work. Then again, this is theory, created from the wonderful if slightly twisted logic in my head;) |
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Quote:
So I don't see anything wrong with that proposition now. By definition, the ELEVATED robot only needs to contact the tower and be above the plane of the PLATFORM. |
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Quote:
|
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
Quote:
so the number is 150 for one 300 for two 450 for all three robots |
Re: ELEVATED but not hanging?
sadly that is a heavy weight and if it way to much your robot could be crushed and well thats sadly a problem
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi