![]() |
Re: Clutch system
Quote:
Thanks |
Re: Clutch system
Quote:
|
Re: Clutch system
Thanks for helping clear a bit of it up. Though this answer by the GDC kinda affirms.
I still think that they (the GDC/FIRST) could still clear up what they mean by a electromagnetic solenoid as having none isn't exactly clear. Not to be like a meanie or anything, but couldn't a motor be classified as a "electromagnetic solenoid" if it shifts the axel out/in for rotations? It's probably a extreme case, but still... Not trying to spark anything up, just trying to make sense of confusion. -Tanner |
Re: Clutch system
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Clutch system
Quote:
for example you could have two plates that move together when pushed by a cylinder (big bore, short stroke, most likely) or two plates with slots, and a servo moves a connecting bar into the slots. or you can use the ball-based torque clutch from an electric drill and actuate the tensioning mechanism with any of the legal actuators. While it may seem simpler to say 'no electromagnetic clutches' or 'no clutches', the GDC is trying to limit you as little as possible by just saying 'no mechanisms with non KOP/R71/R72/servo actuators' |
Re: Clutch system
I think the intent and interpretation of these rules are pretty clear and straightforward. Clutches are allowed, so long as they are actuated via legal means. Many teams have used dog gears (which are essentially a form of clutch) in transmissions for years, but they actuated them using legal pneumatics, motors, or servos.
There are no rules against electro-magnets, but an electro-magnet actuating something constitutes a servo and is thus illegal via the rules already stated. That seems pretty clear to me. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi