![]() |
Mechanical Regulator Movement?
Can we rig a mechanical motor to the 60psi Regulator in order to turn it during the game? We'd like to control the pressure going to the piston based on how hard a kick we need and want to do this with a motor connected to a simple turning mechanism to adjust the regulator.
Is this legal per the rules, or would this be a modification to a pneumatic system that would be disallowed. Thanks for your insight. _Alan |
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
First of all, you really should ask this on the official Q&A forum at FIRST.
My opinion: 1. You must use a legal KOP motor. 2. Most inspectors will have heartburn if you motorize the primary regulator. The heartburn would come in that the motor could adjust the pressure above the specified 60 PSI. However, I think that the secondary regulator may be fair game. Regards, Mike |
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
+1 to Mike's sentiment: Primary Regulator, no. A secondary regulator, a hesitant yes but ask Q&A, however, I can think of better ways to do it.
|
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
I'd be most interested to hear your suggestions of secondary ways of managing this.
|
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
We have in the past used multiple valves and pulsing them on and off through fancy code to achieve different speed, direction, and position of a pneumatic cylinder, including stopping a cylinder in mid-travel. You have to be a bit careful of the mechanical abilities of the valves if you plan to do this (we had one valve start producing metal shavings from being switched faster than it was rated for).
EDIT: you could also have a system where you have a cylinder A. it is connected, through two T fittings, to TWO valves, B and C. B is downstream of a regulator to 30psi. C is downstream of a regulator to 60psi. (You have to account for the return air here too somewhere.) Switch one valve, you get 30psi at the cylinder, switch the other, you get 60psi. Another alternative is your motor-driven regulator concept, only you apply it to a flow-control fitting. |
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
a motor cleanly attached to a secondary regulator could actually be a much slicker setup than the multiple valves (assuming they want more than 2 positions).
|
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
Quote:
|
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
Quote:
|
Re: Mechanical Regulator Movement?
Quote:
By the way, this could also make your cocking method simpler as well. Imagine this:
Who's getting the official answer on this one? Joe J. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi