Chief Delphi

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- Math and Science (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=70)

- - 2=0 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82374)

ExTexan

29-04-2010 22:01

Re: 2=0

Quote:

I know this one. But I won't give the answer away to those who don't.

Thanks.....it made me scratch my head 40 years ago!

Quote:

It would of have been easier for me to figure out if he had stated that a=1 and b=1

Ahh but making it easier wouldn't have been as much fun! ::ouch:: and also....if 1=2 then doesn't 2=4? :-)

PAR_WIG1350

30-04-2010 21:34

Re: 2=0

Quote:

Originally Posted by iCurtis (Post 931240)

What does your TI-84 have to say about: 1782^12 + 1841^12 = 1922^12?

Fermat's Last Theorem

that proof was EPIC, and it still is

biojae

30-04-2010 21:43

Re: 2=0

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExTexan (Post 959074)

also....if 1=2 then doesn't 2=4? :-)

So, then you are saying 1 = 4 then?

a = b; b = c; a = c;
a = 1; b = 2; c = 4;
1 = 2; 2 = 4; 1 = 4;

and if 4 = 8, then would 8 = 16... and so on?
and if so then 1 = inf

DonRotolo

30-04-2010 22:37

Re: 2=0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molten (Post 931235)

Don't always believe your calculator. Sometimes they lie.

Beat me to it

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExTexan (Post 959074)

Thanks.....it made me scratch my head 40 years ago!

Heh, when I had hair to scratch through...:rolleyes:

If we're talking about odd equalities, how 'bout this one:
6 of one = 1/2 dozen of the other.

ExTexan

01-05-2010 19:35

Re: 2=0

Quote:

So, then you are saying 1 = 4 then?

Well I actually hadn't thought of it that way but I guess if the inital formulas are correct then that is a valid assumption! Good one!

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16.

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page