Chief Delphi - Using TimerTasks

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- Java (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=184)

- - Using TimerTasks (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82970)

Geek 2.0

18-02-2010 08:21

Using TimerTasks

Is it a good idea to create TimerTasks to take care of updating certain portions of the robot, such as the drive train or the ball handling system? For instance, if there is something that needs to be called regularly (like setting the Jaguars for motors or checking limit switches, etc.) just set a TimerTask to call it at a 20ms period so that we don't have to worry about updating.

I have them working, but I'm wondering if there are any disadvantages that I'm missing, and also hoping to help anyone who wants to try.

Lord_Jeremy

18-02-2010 22:31

Re: Using TimerTasks

It sounds to me like you're redoing what IterativeRobot does. Maybe I missed something but you're saying you want certain things to only happen periodically? I would just use IterativeRobot and change the update period or use counters to call your functions every X cycles, since the teleopPeriodic frequency is known.

Geek 2.0

18-02-2010 23:16

Re: Using TimerTasks

Well, we're already doing that, but I set up a TimerTask because it's just cleaner, because you don't need to make sure your update functions are at the end of your iterative loop or whatever. Are there any downsides to using a TimerTask?

Lord_Jeremy

19-02-2010 00:19

Re: Using TimerTasks

Eh, I don't know of any, but you should probably hold out for someone with more know-how...

Jared Russell

19-02-2010 08:16

Re: Using TimerTasks

We use TimerTasks extensively in our code this year. Every mechanism that has any "background" tasks like filters or PID controllers gets one. In my opinion it helps to keep your robot's "main loop" uncluttered.

Geek 2.0

20-02-2010 11:04

Re: Using TimerTasks

Thanks for the reassurance.

Here's another question... If I use Timer.delay() from the WPILibJ in a TimerTask, does that still pause ALL of your code? I wouldn't think so, because it only sleeps the current thread (as I understand it... I'm not sure).

Here's the delay() function in the Timer Class:

Code:

    public static void delay(final double seconds) {

        try {

            Thread.sleep((long) (seconds * 1e3));

        } catch (final InterruptedException e) {

        }

    }

Thanks!

ericarseneau

22-02-2010 17:03

Re: Using TimerTasks

It only pauses the calling Thread. Although you do need to keep in mind that this type of delay does not mean that something will occurr every seconds of time. It means that the something will occur AFTER seconds of time has gone by. This means that if your code runs for a long time, you may not get the period you might be expecting.

JasonStern

23-02-2010 10:39

Re: Using TimerTasks

Quote:

Originally Posted by ericarseneau (Post 926469)

... does not mean that something will occurr every seconds of time.

You can call Timer.scheduleAtFixedRate if you want something to be run at a fixed period.

Timer.schedule will run something at a fixed delay instead.

Check out the javadocs for more info: http://www.wbrobotics.com/javadoc/java/util/Timer.html

-Jason

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27.