![]() |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
I look forward to seeing this in Dallas... impressive.
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
With regards to the ball magnet, think of it this way:
If the normal force between the ball and the floor is less than the normal force generated between the ball and the "magnets", then the ball will stay possessed by the robot. This doesn't mean the normal force between the ball and the floor is zero. The instance you see in the video near the goal was an implementation issue that has already been resolved. The ball will always be touching the floor when the magnet is on. I can tell you this: we (148 + 217) created the ball magnet concept using only 9th grade geometry and 11th grade physics (1st semester). |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
All I can say is, if this robot ever comes head to head with 254, the match will be one for the books. |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Paul,
I think everyone is just a little jealous of the 148/217 "ball magnet" skills. I thought something like this would work but we never got around to prototyping it... boy do I wish we did now. |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
I’m progressing well this year through what I think of as the FRC equivalent of the Kübler-Ross model (commonly known as the five stages of grief). I imagine that there are many other folks going through this as well and hopefully we won’t dwell too much more on the negative aspects. Anyways, here’s where I am in my process:
First came “awe”. What an awesome robot! Function AND form nicely wrapped together! Great video! What an awesome TEAM! Next came “envy”. Wish we could create a robot like that. Wish we had such an established and well-grounded design process. Wish we had access to such a great world-class production facility. Wish I could be part of a team like that. Followed quickly by “depression”. How can we compete with that? Am I lacking as a mentor since we aren’t capable of creating robots like? Why even try? Hopefully I’m solidly into the “acceptance” phase now. Regardless of how good any team is, I can still reach out to my team and inspire them in their pursuit of STEM fields. We can still play Breakaway to the best of our abilities. And since FRC is played with alliances of three teams, any robot that can drive can contribute to their alliance’s success. Great strategy can often counterbalance exceptional single robot performance. So how do we win with what we have? Quite frankly we’re happy to have been able to produce a robot at all with all the snow outages… [tangent] What I particularly like about 148’s design is the potential ability to score 3 in autonomous and 2 in the end game. I envision eliminations to be defensive struggles with limited scoring, so capitalizing on these “guaranteed” points is vital. I’ve long admired 217’s and 1114’s (among others) ability to integrate robot design with overall game strategy to maximize the probability of winning.[\tangent] Eventually I’m sure I’ll move into “inspired”. Particularly when teams like 148 are there to help us by providing white papers, robot design, experience, insight, etc. |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
I totally agree Tom. 148 is one of the few teams that inspires me every year. They truly live by the phrase "design is an iterative process." All teams in FIRST should strive to live by this and 148 is just a prime example.
I just happened to have a major facepalm moment when I saw that roller. Just goes to show, you can never prototype too much. Man do I wish our magnet worked this well. |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
If i could spend just one build season with this amazing team as a mentor, I would be a happy happy alumni of the JVN school of innovation, inspiration, and design
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Quote:
Quote:
Again, way to go 148 (and 217). Seriously cool stuff, srs bizniz, kick-butt, whatever way you choose to describe it. |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
We're getting too much credit for the Ball Magnet. The Ball Magnet design is a 100% collaboration between 148 and 217. The Thunderchicken Prototype and Design teams are as good or better than their 148 counter-parts.
Every compliment that is paid to 148 should be echoed 10 times over to our counterparts up north. Years later, I still love the Thunderchickens! -John |
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Something tells me we need to fear 148/217 in Atlanta, and 1114 at all of our competitions... not that I wasnt ALREADY expecting that.
|
Re: pic: Team 148 - Robowranglers 2010 - Armadillo
Hey everyone, you don't have to try to beat teams like 148 and 217 (and teams like 67, 1114, 45, etc. - whatever they come up with). All you have to do is be good enough that they want you on their alliance.
You've seen this; now think of what can you do to complement them, not try to oppose them. And give a few compliments along the line too. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi