Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Modification on 7:

Event: Oregon Autodesk Regional

1.) 997 2130 1515 W
2.) 753 2733 2192 SF
3.) 847 2471 2990 F
4.) 8 1983 2046 SF
5.) 3192 2002 956 QF
6.) 1540 2811 368 QF
7.) 2557 360 3165* QF
8.) 3145 2374 488 QF

2002 was #7 seed
2811 was #8 seed
No declines
*1510 replaced 3165 for QF3-3

Re: week 4
 

We took 1742 first, then 1209. The 4 alliance is right. Can neither confirm nor deny the 3 or 5.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Thanks. I watched the webcast and it must have cut out for exactly the right amount of time...

Troy District:
1.) 469 217 1188 W
2.) 33 910 288 F
3.) 226 573 2163 SF
4.) 2137 1250 2586 SF
5.) 2048 308 302 QF
6.) 3302 815 3322 QF
7.) 2145 503 2832 QF
8.) 2612* 2673 1023 QF

*Declined 2048

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Sacramento:

1. 604 3256 2761 W
2. 2122 2035 1834 F
3. 1280* 1323 675 SF
4. 2141 1351 2156 QF
5. 852 1516 766 SF
6. 2473 2073 1662 QF
7. 1678** 751 1458 QF
8. 841 2551 2085 QF

*1280 declined 2122
**1678 declined 2473

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

North Carolina Regional:

(still waiting on final word from the scouts to make sure the order on the bold characters is correct

1.) 1086 1902 48 W
2.) 1519 1772 1741 F
3.) 122 337 21 QF
4.) 2614 2228 401 QF
5.) 2483 1319 3336 SF
6.) 379 79 832 SF
7.) 449 2415 2655 QF
8.) 3402 900 435 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Michigan State Championship:

1. 1918 469 2834 W
2. 67 217 2612 F
3. 33 1718 308 SF
4. 573 1023 51 QF
5. 70 910 2137 SF
6. 201 27 703 QF
7. 2771 397 1711 QF
8. 2337 2619 226 QF

The webcast cut out after the 4th pick of alliance selections, so I was only able to find the final results. The bolded teams are listed in order of ranking because I didn't get to see the order they were picked in. If anyone knows the orders, please feel free to correct me.

Minnesota North Star:

1. 71 1986 2667 W
2. 171 537 2041 F
3. 2823 3102 3026 QF
4. 3291 2512 2225 SF
5. 2418 876 1816 QF
6. 2220 2143 2535 SF
7. 1764 2472 1675 QF
8. 3292 1652 2977 QF

Minnesota 10,000 Lakes:

1. 1714 2062 3038 W
2. 525 2177 2518 F
3. 2169 2194 2989 SF
4. 2511 2826 2525* 2513 SF
5. 2022 2705 2498 QF
6. 3212 2232 2846 QF
7. 2704 2500 3007 QF
8. 3313 2181 2502 QF

*2513 replaced 2525 after the 2nd quarterfinal match

Lone Star:

1. 148 118 647 W
2. 624 704 3103 F
3. 231 1912 922 SF
4. 441 1429 3029 SF
5. 1865 418 2881 QF
6. 1477 2468 1801 QF
7. 2721 1484 2979 QF
8. 1480 2587 2583 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

It looks like you may have to start the division results now, if you want to be the first one to post them...

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

IRI Results
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Connecticut

1.) 1124 383 102 W
2.) 2836 1073 228 QF
3.) 1501 230 61 F
4.) 694 175 178 237* QF
5.) 2791 177 173 SF
6.) 303 558 2067 QF
7.) 839 40 126 SF
8.) 1071 238 533 QF


*Backup robot

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Conneticut
1 1124 383 102 W
2 2836 1073 228 QF
3 1501 230 61 F
4 694 175 178 QF
5 2791 177 173 SF
6 303 558 2067 QF
7 839 40 126 SF
8 1071 238 533 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I was multi-tasking at the time, but I thought I heard there was a team selected, but didn't have anyone there to accept the invitation so they had to pick someone else. Did I hear it correctly?

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I honestly don't know. I was switching between North Star and 10,000 Lakes so I didn't hear the 2nd round of picks for North Star. I just copied down the results from the webcast.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Las Vegas Regional
1. 25 254 3230
2. 987 973 585
3. 1631 1622 2429
4. 842 39 3019
5. 2496 1013 1266
6. 1726 1572 2637
7. 2484 2984 2485
8. 2543 1967 2813

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

1280's decline was our mistake. 2122
was an excellent robot and was driven
smartly. Let that be a lesson to us.
I wouldn't let the fact of our decline
lead you to repeating the mistake.

Eugene

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Michigan State Championships
1. 1918 469 2834 W
2. 67 217 2612 F
3. 33 1818 308 SF
4. 573 1023 51 QF
5. 70 910 2137 SF
6. 201 27 703 QF
7. 2771 1711 397 QF
8. 2337 2619 226 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Fixed typo

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

6 is right and 8 is backwards. I don't remember any others.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Sort of. It was just your usual alliance selection gaffe of someone not having the correct team number on their list. In this case someone tried to select 3512 who not only wasn't at the event, but doesn't even exist. It was supposed to be 2512 who they then tried to select. 2512 had already been selected in the first round.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I'm not sure why TBA is mixed up about the finals in MSC.
The Winners were: 1918, 469, 2834
The Finalists were: 67, 217, 2612

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

When TBA scraps the FIRST webpage, TBA automatically determines the winner of the finals by who won the highest numbered match, which in this case is elimination match 21 which the Blue Alliance won 13-8. The actual last (4th) match is Match 19 :confused: which Red won 14-12 . Basically, when there is a tie (like the original match 19), FMS will write over the tie with the deciding match score. For whatever reason FMS doesnt allow there to be ties or more than 3 matches per series in the elims. TBA has to fix this issue manually, which it looks like they did. Your badge should update soon.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Final Results for NC:

1.) 1086 1902 48 W
2.) 1519 1772 1741 F
3.) 2228 2614 401 QF
4.) 122 337 21 QF
5.) 2483 1319 3336 SF
6.) 379 79 832 SF
7.) 449 2655 2415 QF
8.) 435 3402 900 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

However, where is the 18-18 tie?

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

On frcfms twitter feed of FRC-spy. TBA fixed the champions, not the scores. In contrast, Northstar had 2 ties and is not fixed yet.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I assume the database will be released shortly after the divisions are announced?

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

You are correct. The database group is working furiously to have this year's version ready for the release of the divisions.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Im not sure if it still matters, but Id still just like to post this anyway. Some fields may not be accurate since I dont know exactly what each team seeded (etc), but the results are right, I think. If there is a problem, that needs to be changed, feel free to tell me.

Curie:
1) 1114, 469, 2041 W
2) 111, 1538, 2630 SF
3) 1986, 1676, 888* F
4) 2612, 27, 141 SF
5) 1306, 2337, 624 QF
6) 175, 88, 573 QF
7) 3235, 2775, 40 QF
8) 1511, 1732, 368 QF
*888 switched in with 1421

Newton:
1) 67, 177, 294 W
2) 20, 668, 2757 SF
3) 16, 343, 1718 F
4) 102, 1922, 1073 SF
5) 706, 910, 1592 QF
6) 1902, 337, 1868 QF
7) 971, 525, 2137 QF
8) 308, 399 2619 QF

Galileo:
1) 1086, 217, 2429 F
2) 1717, 271, 263 QF
3) 51, 78, 2122 SF
4) 1625, 2056, 3138 W
5) 2016, 188, 1058 QF
6) 365, 79, 744 QF
7) 230, 1714, 1305 SF
8) 1771, 2130, 85 QF

Archimedes: (thanks alex)
1) 254, 233, 3357 W
2) 33, 148, 201 F
3) 1124, 968, 2062 SF
4) 330, 25, 1622 SF
5) 1519, 1918, 70 QF
6) 604, 341, 3256 QF
7) 3280, 359, 71 QF
8) 1730, 234, 1218 QF

Einstein:
C) 1114, 469, 2041 F
N) 67, 177, 294 W
G) 1625, 2056, 3138 SF
A) 254, 233, 3357 SF

A vs C
G vs N

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

1) 254, 233, 3357 W Correct
2) 330, 25, 1622 SF 4th Seed
3) 33, 148, 201 F 2nd Seed
4) 1124, 968, 2062 SF 3rd Seed
5) 604, 341, 3256 QF 6th Seed
6) 3280, 359, 71 QF 7th Seed
7) 1519, 1918, 70 QF 5th Seed
8) 1730, 234, 1218 QF 8th Seed

EDIT: Switched around teams in order to show correct alliance picking. Italicized to show changes.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

1) 1114, 469, 2041 W
2) 111, 1538, 2630 SF
3) 1986, 1676, 888* F
4) 2612, 27, 141 SF
5) 1306, 2337, 624 QF
6) 175, 88, 573 QF
7) 3235, 40, 2775 QF
8) 1511, 1732, 368 QF

I personally don't remember the order for Alliance 6, 7, and 8

-Clinton-

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

6 is correct
7 is: 3234, 2775, 40
8 is correct