Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Peachtree Regional

1.) 1466 1771 1683
2.) 3214 2918 3404
3.) 1848 34 3139
4.) 1746 1261 1758
5.) 547 1414 1648
6.) 1127 590 2967
7.) 2974 832 2415
8.) 281 2655 1379

Will update with W/L later.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Event: BAE Systems Manchester 2010

1.) 1922 78 134 F
2.) 1073 1519 1058 W
3.) 126 40 2386 SF
4.) 20 131 1517 QF
5.) 138 238 1729 SF
6.) 1277 151 175 QF
7.) 562 241 319 QF
8.) 1493 58 501 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Traverse City

1 1918 2645 1254 W
2 2771 107 3098 QF
3 2474 3115 835 SF
4 85 830 2586 SF
5 3357 3234 858 QF
6 904 74 1711 QF
7 2959 66 2246 F
8141 2645 2000 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Traverse City District
1.1918/2645/1254
2. 2771/107/3098
3. 2474/3115/835
4. 25/830/2586
5. 3357/3234/858
6. 904/74/1771
7. 2959/66/2246
8. 141/2945/2000

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Kansas City

1 2345 525 931 W
2 1625 16 2410 F
3 1209 1825 2335 QF
4 1785 1986 1730 SF
5 1094 1997 1806 QF
6 2461 935 1763 SF
7 234 868 1982QF
8 932 1810 1208QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Event: Greater Kansas City 2010
1) 2345 525 931 W
2) 1625 16 2410 F (I still can't believe it either)
3) 1209 1825 2335 QF
4) 1785 1986 1730 SF
5) 1094 1997 1806 QF
6) 2461 935 1763 SF
7) 234 868 1982 QF
8) 932 1810 1208 QF

RTFG cheated and posted a partial alliance before the event was done selecting D: that's no fair :(

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I saw this late and they are no longer showing the Alliance board for Washington. I watched the Alliance selection and here is what I pieced together from the standings, memory and a few notes: (everyone, please tell me if you see anything wrong with DC)

Washington DC 2010
1. 1727 3123 176 W
2. 339 768 1885 SF
3. 1418 2377 346 F
4. 2912 449 2068 SF
5. 45 3373 1829 QF
6. 614 2010 612 QF
7. 1111 3283 620 QF
8. 2641 1024 701 QF

There were no declines


I also got KC while it was happening
Kansas City 2010
1. 2345 525 931 W
2. 1625 16 2410 F
3. 1209 1825 2335 QF
4. 1785 1986 1730 SF
5. 1094 1997 1806 QF
6. 2461 935 1763 SF
7. 234 868 1982 QF
8. 932 1810 1208 QF

Did 234 decline 1625? (didnt really hear it) EDIT: No. Thanks Mike

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Kettering

1) 67 910 70
2) 2619 33 894
3) 2834 27 494
4) 245 201 1322
5) 1 1243 2337
6) 51 703 397
7) 2054 49 548
8) ??? 322 1684

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Autodesk Oregon Regional

1) 997, 2130, 1515
2) 753 2192 2733
3) 847, 2990, 2471
4) 8, 1983, 2046
5) 2374, 3145, 488
6) 2002, 958, 3192
7) 3185, 360, 2557
8) 1540, 368, 2811

(sorry if there are typos, let me know and I will fix them)

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Should be 2046.

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

San Diego:
1. 2543 1717 115
2. 1266* 687 2839
3. 359 100 294
4. 1538 1388 668
5. 812 192 2029
6. 599 981 1868
7. 1332 846 815
8. 1572 2984 1622

*Declined by 1538 and 359

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Kettering
1) 67 910 70 W
2) 2619 33 894 F
3) 2834 27 494 SF
4) 245 201 1322 QF
5) 1 1243 2337 SF
6) 51 703 397 QF
7) 2054 49 548 QF
8) 3398 322 1504 QF

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

1625 never asked 234, their first pick was 16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

Bayou City Regional

1)1912 256 231 QF
2)1421 3364 2992* W
3)2587* 3228 1927* QF
4)2078 1477 364 SF
5)2091 2190 1339* QF
6)3411 57 3039 SF
7)2920 2242 2973 QF
8)2221* 1920 2080 F

* was seeded 5
* declined by 2078
* was seeded 8 after 2992
* was seeded 8 after 1927
* was seeded 8 after 1339

I don't know if this is too much information but there were a lot of changes. It was a great regional. Better than I expected. Every team played hard even though we had loads of problems (team and technical). :o

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 

I'm confused. If they were seeded 8 than they should not have been a second round pick. How did that happen?