Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2010 Alliance Selection Results (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83814)

Karthik 03-03-2010 04:25

2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Hello all,

As you may or may not know, since 2004 Team 1114 has been publishing an extensive scouting database for the FIRST Community to use in preparation and during the FIRST World Championship. Past databases can be found here. All the data found in these databases is mined from the results posted by FIRST on www.usfirst.org. Unfortunately, FIRST has a habit of not tracking the proper order of alliances. The system for the past few years has made no distinction between the Alliance Captain, 1st Pick and 2nd Pick. This information makes up a pretty important portion of the database. In the past we've been able to get this information by scouring CD and by some reverse engineering of the standings. Unfortunately with 48 regional/district events, this task is becoming much more difficult leading to more gaps in the database. As such, we're asking for your help.

What I ask is that for every regional this year, one person posts the full results from alliance selection in this thread. Here's an example form Waterloo 2006.

Event: Waterloo 2006

1.) 1114 1503 1281 W
2.) 1219 1596 912 SF
3.) 188 610 771 F
4.) 1680* 1901 931 QF
5.) 68* 1305 1558 SF
6.) 854 830 1189 QF
7.) 1846 772 859 QF
8.) 1084 781 1605 QF
* Declined Team 1219

All that's necessary is that you post the alliances in the order that they were selected. Keeping track of declines is a nice bonus. If you really want to go the extra mile you can add in the overall finish of the alliance as shown in the example, but it's not critical.

Most scouts already write this stuff down during alliance selection, so it's just a matter of one person from each regional remembering to keep that scrap of paper until they get home and posting it here. Or, if you're watching on a webcast jots things down as you watch and then post away.

As added incentive, I'll give out some form of Team 1114 gear to every person who posts at least three correct, non duplicated, regional results.

Thanks from all of us who put together this database, especially Roberto.

Michael Corsetto 03-03-2010 05:24

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I'll be taking good notes Saturday afternoon ;)

Tom Bottiglieri 03-03-2010 11:08

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
We should be able to append this information to TBA as well, hopefully.

Chris is me 03-03-2010 11:11

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I'll post everything / the first three events I see on the webcasts as it happens. I was already planning on helping out at my own events and stuff, but then I read the second to last line of your post. :)

BrendanB 03-03-2010 11:13

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
3 regionals! Darn!;)

Sounds like an interesting system. Can't wait to see how it turns out!

kwotremb 03-03-2010 12:06

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I will hopefully get this info for you at the Traverse City District this weekend.

Also do you guys need any past results, or are you just looking for this years results?

Karthik 03-03-2010 22:44

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwotremb (Post 930925)
I will hopefully get this info for you at the Traverse City District this weekend.

Also do you guys need any past results, or are you just looking for this years results?

Just looking for results from the current year. Thanks!

delsaner 03-03-2010 22:56

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I can do NJ regional and Virginia (Former VCU) regional. I will rank the alliances from winners to QF eliminated alliances. I'll also state alliance numbers, who played who, and the teams within each alliance. May I use my version of recording?

Ex:
A1- (#, #, #)
A2- (#, #, #)
...
A8- (#, #, #)

A1- W
A2- F (lost to A1)
A3- SF (lost to A2)
A4- SF (lost to A1)
A5- QF (lost to A4)
A6- QF (lost to A3)
A7- QF (lost to A2)
A8- QF (lost to A1)

Karthik 03-03-2010 23:22

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by delsaner (Post 931216)
I can do NJ regional and Virginia (Former VCU) regional. I will rank the alliances from winners to QF eliminated alliances. I'll also state alliance numbers, who played who, and the teams within each alliance. May I use my version of recording?

Ex:
A1- (#, #, #)
A2- (#, #, #)
...
A8- (#, #, #)

A1- W
A2- F (lost to A1)
A3- SF (lost to A2)
A4- SF (lost to A1)
A5- QF (lost to A4)
A6- QF (lost to A3)
A7- QF (lost to A2)
A8- QF (lost to A1)

Hey Eric,

Thanks for offering to help! I'd prefer it if you used the format that I described (it displays all the info that you'd post, since FIRST uses a consistent bracket, e.g. 1v8, 4v5, 2v7, 3v6), but ultimately it's up to you. As long as we get the information of who was selected in the proper order, it's all good.

Andrew Schreiber 03-03-2010 23:43

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Karthik, as this is part of the FiM scoring it should all be available on the FiM website. (As I recall that is Jim Zondag having people text it to him as the events go) we had planned on seeing if we could consistently figure it out based on the data on FIRST's website. I will definitely let you know if I get that running.

Karthik 04-03-2010 00:01

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 931234)
Karthik, as this is part of the FiM scoring it should all be available on the FiM website. (As I recall that is Jim Zondag having people text it to him as the events go) we had planned on seeing if we could consistently figure it out based on the data on FIRST's website. I will definitely let you know if I get that running.

Thanks, Andrew. Last year the FiM events were the easiest for us to get the results for as everything was displayed correctly on their website. If you can figure out how to automate the process from the results on the FIRST website, that would be amazing.

Andrew Schreiber 04-03-2010 00:18

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Karthik (Post 931241)
Thanks, Andrew. Last year the FiM events were the easiest for us to get the results for as everything was displayed correctly on their website. If you can figure out how to automate the process from the results on the FIRST website, that would be amazing.

On a related note, I do plan on getting FRCFeed back up, hopefully tomorrow night (if FIRST puts up some data for me to test with) so it will hopefully automate your collection of match data too. I'll work with Clinton on getting the automated alliance stuff up hopefully by next week.

delsaner 04-03-2010 10:21

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Karthik (Post 931223)
Hey Eric,

Thanks for offering to help! I'd prefer it if you used the format that I described (it displays all the info that you'd post, since FIRST uses a consistent bracket, e.g. 1v8, 4v5, 2v7, 3v6), but ultimately it's up to you. As long as we get the information of who was selected in the proper order, it's all good.

No problem! I'll use your method, but I will re-arrange it with my method

Ex:

A2) W (#,#,#)
A6) F (#,#,#)
etc...

JamesBrown 04-03-2010 12:36

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by delsaner (Post 931338)
No problem! I'll use your method, but I will re-arrange it with my method

Ex:

A2) W (#,#,#)
A6) F (#,#,#)
etc...

I don't know for sure but I would assume that Karthik is looking for people to use his format so it is easier to paste into Excel (or parse and use for whatever he wants to use it for)


With a standard format he can just copy and paste the block and every regional will look the same, If the format is different (even if it is only slightly different) the data becomes more difficult to parse and cannot be simply copied and pasted into Excel.



-James

Vikesrock 06-03-2010 12:17

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
FLR will be edited in as soon as it is complete. I can add final finish later in the day, but I had to get these up here to get my shot at gear ;)

Event: Peachtree 2010

1)1466 1771 1683
2)3214 2918 3404
3)1848 34 3139
4)1746 1261 1758
5)547 1414 1648
6)1127 590 2967
7)2974 832 2415
8)281 2655 1379

Event: Finger Lakes 2010

1)1551 217 174
2)145 1241 250
3)3173 229 378
4)1511 3157 578
5)1559 1507 291
6)188* 610 191
7)2852 639 340
8)63 1126 2053

*Declined 3173

Michael Corsetto 06-03-2010 12:17

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Peachtree Regional

1.) 1466 1771 1683
2.) 3214 2918 3404
3.) 1848 34 3139
4.) 1746 1261 1758
5.) 547 1414 1648
6.) 1127 590 2967
7.) 2974 832 2415
8.) 281 2655 1379

Will update with W/L later.

B_Dubbs 06-03-2010 12:46

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Event: BAE Systems Manchester 2010

1.) 1922 78 134 F
2.) 1073 1519 1058 W
3.) 126 40 2386 SF
4.) 20 131 1517 QF
5.) 138 238 1729 SF
6.) 1277 151 175 QF
7.) 562 241 319 QF
8.) 1493 58 501 QF

ATannahill 06-03-2010 13:02

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Traverse City

1 1918 2645 1254 W
2 2771 107 3098 QF
3 2474 3115 835 SF
4 85 830 2586 SF
5 3357 3234 858 QF
6 904 74 1711 QF
7 2959 66 2246 F
8141 2645 2000 QF

Monty Python 06-03-2010 13:13

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Traverse City District
1.1918/2645/1254
2. 2771/107/3098
3. 2474/3115/835
4. 25/830/2586
5. 3357/3234/858
6. 904/74/1771
7. 2959/66/2246
8. 141/2945/2000

ATannahill 06-03-2010 13:36

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Kansas City

1 2345 525 931 W
2 1625 16 2410 F
3 1209 1825 2335 QF
4 1785 1986 1730 SF
5 1094 1997 1806 QF
6 2461 935 1763 SF
7 234 868 1982QF
8 932 1810 1208QF

Chris is me 06-03-2010 13:49

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Event: Greater Kansas City 2010
1) 2345 525 931 W
2) 1625 16 2410 F (I still can't believe it either)
3) 1209 1825 2335 QF
4) 1785 1986 1730 SF
5) 1094 1997 1806 QF
6) 2461 935 1763 SF
7) 234 868 1982 QF
8) 932 1810 1208 QF

RTFG cheated and posted a partial alliance before the event was done selecting D: that's no fair :(

The Lucas 06-03-2010 13:57

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I saw this late and they are no longer showing the Alliance board for Washington. I watched the Alliance selection and here is what I pieced together from the standings, memory and a few notes: (everyone, please tell me if you see anything wrong with DC)

Washington DC 2010
1. 1727 3123 176 W
2. 339 768 1885 SF
3. 1418 2377 346 F
4. 2912 449 2068 SF
5. 45 3373 1829 QF
6. 614 2010 612 QF
7. 1111 3283 620 QF
8. 2641 1024 701 QF

There were no declines


I also got KC while it was happening
Kansas City 2010
1. 2345 525 931 W
2. 1625 16 2410 F
3. 1209 1825 2335 QF
4. 1785 1986 1730 SF
5. 1094 1997 1806 QF
6. 2461 935 1763 SF
7. 234 868 1982 QF
8. 932 1810 1208 QF

Did 234 decline 1625? (didnt really hear it) EDIT: No. Thanks Mike

ATannahill 06-03-2010 14:05

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Kettering

1) 67 910 70
2) 2619 33 894
3) 2834 27 494
4) 245 201 1322
5) 1 1243 2337
6) 51 703 397
7) 2054 49 548
8) ??? 322 1684

danshaffer 06-03-2010 15:59

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Autodesk Oregon Regional

1) 997, 2130, 1515
2) 753 2192 2733
3) 847, 2990, 2471
4) 8, 1983, 2046
5) 2374, 3145, 488
6) 2002, 958, 3192
7) 3185, 360, 2557
8) 1540, 368, 2811

(sorry if there are typos, let me know and I will fix them)

Dave McLaughlin 06-03-2010 16:05

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danshaffer (Post 932233)
Autodesk Oregon Regional

3) 847, 2990, 2471
4) 8, 1983, 2048

(sorry if there are typos, let me know and I will fix them)

Should be 2046.

robodude03 06-03-2010 16:16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
San Diego:
1. 2543 1717 115
2. 1266* 687 2839
3. 359 100 294
4. 1538 1388 668
5. 812 192 2029
6. 599 981 1868
7. 1332 846 815
8. 1572 2984 1622

*Declined by 1538 and 359

Adam Freeman 06-03-2010 20:08

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 932209)
Kettering

1) 67 910 70
2) 2619 33 894
3) 2834 27 494
4) 245 201 1322
5) 1 1243 2337
6) 51 703 397
7) 2054 49 548
8) ??? 322 1684

Kettering
1) 67 910 70 W
2) 2619 33 894 F
3) 2834 27 494 SF
4) 245 201 1322 QF
5) 1 1243 2337 SF
6) 51 703 397 QF
7) 2054 49 548 QF
8) 3398 322 1504 QF

dodar 06-03-2010 20:08

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Lucas (Post 932206)
I saw this late and they are no longer showing the Alliance board for Washington. I watched the Alliance selection and here is what I pieced together from the standings, memory and a few notes: (everyone, please tell me if you see anything wrong with DC)

Washington DC 2010
1. 1727 3123 176
2. 339 768 1885
3. 1418 2377 346
4. 2912 449 2068
5. 45 3373 1829
6. 614 2010 612
7. 1111 3283 620
8. 2641 1024 701

There were no declines


I also got KC while it was happening
Kansas City 2010
1. 2345 525 931
2. 1625 16 2410
3. 1209 1825 2335
4. 1785 1986 1730
5. 1094 1997 1806
6. 2461 835 1763
7. 234 868 1982
8. 932 1810 1208

Did 234 decline 1625? (didnt really hear it)

1625 never asked 234, their first pick was 16

familyguyfreak 06-03-2010 21:21

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Bayou City Regional

1)1912 256 231 QF
2)1421 3364 2992* W
3)2587* 3228 1927* QF
4)2078 1477 364 SF
5)2091 2190 1339* QF
6)3411 57 3039 SF
7)2920 2242 2973 QF
8)2221* 1920 2080 F

* was seeded 5
* declined by 2078
* was seeded 8 after 2992
* was seeded 8 after 1927
* was seeded 8 after 1339

I don't know if this is too much information but there were a lot of changes. It was a great regional. Better than I expected. Every team played hard even though we had loads of problems (team and technical). :o

ATannahill 06-03-2010 21:29

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by familyguyfreak (Post 932335)
Bayou City Regional

1)1912 256 231 QF
2)1421 3364 2992* W
3)2587* 3228 1927* QF
4)2078 1477 364 SF
5)2091 2190 1339* QF
6)3411 57 3039 SF
7)2920 2242 2973 QF
8)2221* 1920 2080 F

* was seeded 5
* declined by 2078
* was seeded 8 after 2992
* was seeded 8 after 1927
* was seeded 8 after 1339

I don't know if this is too much information but there were a lot of changes. It was a great regional. Better than I expected. Every team played hard even though we had loads of problems (team and technical). :o

I'm confused. If they were seeded 8 than they should not have been a second round pick. How did that happen?

Chris is me 06-03-2010 21:33

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by familyguyfreak (Post 932335)
Bayou City Regional

1)1912 256 231 QF
2)1421 3364 2992* W
3)2587* 3228 1927* QF
4)2078 1477 364 SF
5)2091 2190 1339* QF
6)3411 57 3039 SF
7)2920 2242 2973 QF
8)2221* 1920 2080 F

* was seeded 5
* declined by 2078
* was seeded 8 after 2992
* was seeded 8 after 1927
* was seeded 8 after 1339

I don't know if this is too much information but there were a lot of changes. It was a great regional. Better than I expected. Every team played hard even though we had loads of problems (team and technical). :o

There's no way that's in order of Captain - Pick 1 - Pick 2.

familyguyfreak 06-03-2010 21:39

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 932346)
There's no way that's in order of Captain - Pick 1 - Pick 2.

How should I put it that it shows that those people were alliance captains but were chosen to be apart of another alliance?

ATannahill 06-03-2010 21:42

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
You can still use the asterisks, you just put them in the middle.

familyguyfreak 06-03-2010 21:43

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 932353)
You can still use the asterisks, you just put them in the middle.

Alright. Thank you, I'll correct it.

familyguyfreak 06-03-2010 21:48

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
The CORRECT version :)

Bayou City Regional

1)1912 231 256QF
2)1421 2992* 3364 W
3)2587* 1927* 3228 QF
4)2078 1477 364 SF
5)2091 1339* 2190 QF
6)3411 57 3039 SF
7)2920 2242 2973 QF
8)2221* 1920 2080 F

* was seeded 5
* declined by 2078
* was seeded 8 after 2992
* was seeded 8 after 1927
* was seeded 8 after 1339

Let me know if you find anything I have wrong

Lil' Lavery 06-03-2010 23:16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Lucas (Post 932206)
: (everyone, please tell me if you see anything wrong with DC)

Washington DC 2010
1. 1727 3123 176
2. 339 768 1885
3. 1418 2377 346
4. 2912 449 2068
5. 45 3373 1829
6. 614 2010 612
7. 1111 3283 620
8. 2641 1024 701

There were no declines

My sheet got lost in the fray of cleaning up after alliance selection, so I can't correct exactly. But I don't think this list is 100% accurate. I'm pretty sure 1829 was 45's first selection.

The Lucas 07-03-2010 02:40

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 932439)
My sheet got lost in the fray of cleaning up after alliance selection, so I can't correct exactly. But I don't think this list is 100% accurate. I'm pretty sure 1829 was 45's first selection.

I was more certain of 3373 being 45's first pick because I remember Blair making a comment about the vets picking the rookies in the first round. 1829 did play the midfield which is rare for a 3rd bot, but I figured that decision was to allow 1829 to try to hang. Again, this is from memory so there is a good chance you are right

Vikesrock 07-03-2010 13:36

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
New Jersey

1)25 1676 3059
2)422 2016 816
3)303* 56 2495
4)709 293 41
5)1923 2753 2180
6)1672 11 2344
7)1279 223 1089
8)870** 102 2458

*Declined team 422
**Declined team 709

Monty Python 07-03-2010 13:36

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
New Jersey
1. 25/1676/3059
2. 422/2016/816
3. 303*/56/2495
4. 709/293/41
5. 1923/2753/2180
6. 1672/11/2344
7. 1279/223/1089
8. 870#/102/2458
*Declined 422
#Declined 708

ATannahill 07-03-2010 13:36

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
New Jersey

1) 25 1676 3059 W
2) 422 2016 816 F
3) 303 56 2495 SF
4) 709 293 41 QF
5) 1923 2753 2180 SF
6) 1672 11 2344 QF
7) 1279 223 1089 QF
8) 870 102 2458 QF

Nawaid Ladak 07-03-2010 13:37

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
New Jersey Regional

1.) 25 1676 3059 W
2.) 422 2016 816 F
3.) 303* 56 2495 SF
4.) 709 293 41 QF
5.) 1923 2753 2180 SF
6.) 1672 11 2344 QF
7.) 1279 223 1089 QF
8.) 870** 102 2458 QF
* declined team 422
** declined team 709

I'll post results as they come in.

EDIT: Somebody beat me to it.
EDIT 2: now it's offical

kwotremb 07-03-2010 16:12

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Traverse City District:

1) 1918 - 2645 - 1254 (Winners)
2) 2771 - 107 - 3098
3) 2474 - 3115 - 835 (Semis)
4) 85 - 830 - 2586 (Semis)
5) 3357 - 3234 - 858
6) 904 - 74 - 1711
7) 2959 - 66 - 2246 (Finalist)
8) 141 - 2245 - 2000

engunneer 08-03-2010 09:51

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danshaffer (Post 932233)
Autodesk Oregon Regional

1) 997, 2130, 1515
2) 753 2192 2733
3) 847, 2990, 2471
4) 8, 1983, 2046
5) 2374, 3145, 488
6) 2002, 958, 3192
7) 3185, 360, 2557
8) 1540, 368, 2811

(sorry if there are typos, let me know and I will fix them)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave McLaughlin (Post 932238)
Should be 2046.

I have some corrections to Oregon, the above are not listed in cap, 1, 2 order, and don't have the W,QF,SF,F of Karthik's format

Event: Oregon 2010

1.) 997 2130 1515 W
2.) 753 2733 2192 SF
3.) 847 2471 2990 F
4.) 8 1983 2046 SF
5.) 3192 2002 956 QF
6.) 1540 2811 368 QF
7.) 2557 360 3165 QF
8.) 3145 2374 488 QF

2002 was #7 seed
2811 was #8 seed
No declines

fireyoshi 10-03-2010 15:16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by familyguyfreak (Post 932364)

Bayou City Regional

6)3411 57 3039 SF
Let me know if you find anything I have wrong

It should be 3411 3039 57.

Jimmy Cao 10-03-2010 15:40

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
I know this mostly is relevant to last year, as this year's data is already here, but FiM keeps a record of who picks who, as it is part of the State competition qualifying algorithm. If you need last year's data, I'm sure someone with strong ties to FiM can find that data (I have seen it in a spreadsheet before, I just don't happen to have it).

Wayne C. 10-03-2010 18:41

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Monty Python (Post 932191)
Traverse City District
1.1918/2645/1254
2. 2771/107/3098
3. 2474/3115/835
4. 25/830/2586
5. 3357/3234/858
6. 904/74/1771
7. 2959/66/2246
8. 141/2945/2000

umm- we weren't in Traverse City- only in spirit ( if we were did we win?) ; )

Karthik 10-03-2010 22:39

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wayne C. (Post 935362)
umm- we weren't in Traverse City- only in spirit ( if we were did we win?) ; )

This seems like the appropriate spot for the following message. I know all of you want to help us with the database, but please refrain from posting unless you are absolutely sure your results are correct. There were numerous mistakes last weekend, leading to our data collecting team having to do extra work. So, yes, please keep posting results, but make sure they're correct.

B_Dubbs 13-03-2010 11:57

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
WPI 2010

1 230 20 228 W
2 1735 2370 663 F
3 3280 348 157 SF
4 190 2523 839 SF
5 2791 195 1124 QF
6 2877 172 3205 QF
7 358 716 2621 QF
8 2104 1995 3125 QF

Kristian Calhoun 13-03-2010 12:31

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Pittsburgh

1.) 1114 63 117
2.) 1279 3138 2656
3.) 1503 222 2252
4.) 451 2051 1317
5.) 2809 2614 2641
6.) 1038 3193 306
7.) 337 2544 128
8.) 1708 1249 433

Lil' Lavery 13-03-2010 12:38

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kristian Calhoun (Post 936290)
Pittsburgh

1.) 1114 63 117
2.) 1279 3138 2656
3.) 1503 222 2252
4.) 451 2051 1317
5.) 2809 2614 2641
6.) 1038 3193 306
7.) 337 2544 128
8.) 1708 1249 433

Something tells me that 1114 doesn't really need help for the regionals they attend... :rolleyes:

Kristian Calhoun 13-03-2010 13:33

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Sean, I'm aware. But I'm sure many others also use this thread to look up alliance selections for the events they're watching, especially when the information is not posted in the specific regional/district event thread.

Cass Tech District

1.) 217 469 2960
2.) 1718 226 240
3.) 2612 308 2673
4.) 1941 302 3002
5.) 313 2851 314
6.) 3098 3401 280
7.) 2048 3096 123
8.) 515 903 94

Florida
1.) 179 1592 3164
2.) 1065 103 2425
3.) 86 1612 1251
4.) 343 1902 180
5.) 744 69 1876
6.) 1345 945 1649
7.) 665 386 118
8.) 1557 801 79

RMS11 13-03-2010 13:46

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Florida:

1) 179 1592 3164
2) 1065 103 2425
3) 86 1612 1251
4) 343 1902 180
5) 744 69 1876
6) 1345 945 1649
7) 665 386 118
8) 1557 801 79

:D

Dmentor 13-03-2010 14:03

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Chesapeake

1.) 1058 365 2199
2.) 1517 2377 2534
3.) 88 768 686
4.) 1629 888 708
5.) 2528 1218 173
6.) 2546 225 7
7.) 1143 272 1727
8.) 467 1168 1719

engunneer 13-03-2010 19:04

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Event: Wisconsin 2010

1.) 2481 706 3362 F
2.) 111 1714 2077 SF
3.) 2574 1732 171 W
4.) 2194 537 93 SF
5.) 1716 1018 2202 QF
6.) 167 930 1736 QF
7.) 2062* 1306 1259 QF
8.) 1091 2338 2826 QF
* Declined Team 2574

3197 subbed for 2077 starting sf2.4
2506 subbed for 3362 starting f1.2

BrendanB 13-03-2010 19:12

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dmentor (Post 936314)
Chesapeake

1.) 1058 365 2199
2.) 1517 2377 2534
3.) 88 768 686
4.) 1629 888 708
5.) 2528 1218 173
6.) 2546 225 7
7.) 1143 272 1727
8.) 467 1168 1719

1.) 1058 365 2199 SF
2.) 1517 2377 2534 W
3.) 88 768 686 SF
4.) 1629 888 708 QF
5.) 2528 1218 173 F
6.) 2546 225 7 QF
7.) 1143 272 1727 QF
8.) 467 1168 1719 QF

Added results like desired! ;)

Joe J. 13-03-2010 23:30

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Ann Arbor

1.) 2619 830 2611 F
2.) 573 2337 66 C
3.) 2832 503 2719 QF
4.) 247 862 1677 SF
5.) 2620 1250 1596 QF
6.) 3322 835 3302 SF
7.) 2145 3115 894* QF
8.) 518 49 326 QF

* 68 declined the third spot in this alliance

Chris is me 14-03-2010 00:17

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Dubbs (Post 936276)
WPI 2010

1 230 20 228 W
2 1735 2370 663 F
3 3280 348 157 SF
4 190 2523 839 SF
5 2791 195 1124 QF
6 2877 172 3205 QF
7 358 716 2621 QF
8 2104 1995 3125 QF

Just confirming this matches what I wrote down, as strange as some of it may seem. I'm guessing you don't want the first 3 picks of the old alliance selection...

JABot67 14-03-2010 13:07

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
New York

1.) 341 694 3204
2.) 522 354 3142
3.) 527 555 334
4.) 2344 181 263
5.) 2836 1302 395
6.) 375 271 1155
7.) 3059 333 3111
8.) 2573 743 421
There were 2 declines, one of which was by a team that was not in the top 8, and could not have advanced into it, like 610 tried last year.

Chris is me 20-03-2010 12:34

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Midwest Regional

1. 1732 16 3352 (GO HILLTOPPERS)
2. 1625 111 3135
3. 2949 2358 3110
4. 1781 71 3067
5. 2115 648 2704
6. 101 2709 2781
7. 3061 2338 2769
8. 2041 1000 1739

LOTS of interpicking, huh.

ATannahill 20-03-2010 12:36

week 3 results
 
West Michigan

1 1718 1918* 1896 F
2 2645 107* 2245 QF
3 2075 2771* 2611 SF
4 397 703* 1711 SF
5 3234 288* 2246 QF
6 141 85 904 QF
7 1243 3357* 2054 W
8 2474 2000 1322 QF

accepted request from team directly above them*

St. Louis

1 1208 2775 3284 W
2 1806 1098 1329 F
3 1182 1706 1444 QF (2 ties)
4 3397 501 1448 SF
5 3186 279 1756 QF
6 2978 624 3410 SF
7 1985 2838 2177 QF
8 1288 931 1094 QF

Midwest

1 1732 16 3352 W
2 1625 111 3135 SF
3 2949 2358 3110 F
4 1781 71 3067 SF
5 2115 648 2704 QF
6 101 2709 2781 QF
7 3061 2338 2769 QF
8 2041 1000 1739 QF

Detroit

1 67 51 1023 W
2 27 201 1 F
3 70 245 2834 SF
4 815 247 2137 QF
5 123 1528 818 SF
6 3096 494 2851 QF
7 2620 903 440 QF
8 3115 1025 548 QF

Dallas

1 148 2016 1817 W
2 456 1421 2947 SF
3 1429 704 2352 F
4 2950 1296 3310 QF
5 1745* 2080 2864 SF
6 3353 1108 418 QF
7 2953 2848 1785 QF
8 2943 3005 2283 QF

*declined 2950

Virginia

1 1676 1086 1418 W
2 975 1731 1908 QF
3 3136 293 1522 QF
4 339 134 435 SF
5 1033 75 612 QF
6 422 122 611 SF
7 617 346 1895 F
8 614 620 2363 QF

Silicon Valley

1 971 254 649 W
2 192 1280 701 SF
3 2868 100 675 F
4 8 604 1323 SF
5 846 973 3129 QF
6 670 3256 1351 QF
7 114 1516 1458 QF
8 2854 668 115 QF

Alex Cormier 20-03-2010 12:37

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 939923)
Editing in Midwest as it happens...

1. 1732
2. 16
3. 1625
4. 111
5. 2949
6. 2358
7. 1781
8. 2115

Not fair! :p
I'll take STL then.

Clinton Bolinger 20-03-2010 12:40

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 939924)
West Michigan

1 1718 1918* 1896
2 2645 107* 2245
3 2075 2771* 2611
4 397 703* 1711
5 3234 288* 2246
6 141 85 904
7 1243 3357* 2054
8 2474 2000 1322

accepted request from team directly above them*

2nd pick for Alliance 8 should be 1322.

-Clinton-

Alex Cormier 20-03-2010 12:51

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
St. Louis

AC, P1, P2
1) 1208, 2775, 3284 W
2) 1806, 1088, 1329 F
3) 1182, 1706, 1444 QF
4) 3397, 501, 1448 SF
5) 3186, 279, 1756 QF
6) 2978, 624, 3410 SF
7) 1984, 2838, 2177 QF
8) 1288, 931, 1094 QF

B_Dubbs 20-03-2010 12:52

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
St. Louis
1 1208 2775 3284
2 1806 1098 1329
3 1182 1706 1444
4 3397 501 1448
5 3186 279 1756
6 2978 624 3410
7 1985 2838 2177
8 1288 931 1094

ATannahill 20-03-2010 12:53

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Clinton Bolinger (Post 939928)
2nd pick for Alliance 8 should be 1322.

-Clinton-

Oops, hit the wrong key.

Chris is me 20-03-2010 12:54

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier (Post 939926)
Not fair! :p
I'll take STL then.

Blame rtfgnow. He started it.

Alex Cormier 20-03-2010 13:05

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Detroit:

AC, P1, P2
1) 67, 51, 1023 W
2) 27, 201, 1 F
3) 70, 245, 2834 SF
4) 815, 247, 2137 QF
5) 123, 1528, 818 SF
6) 3096, 494, 2851 QF
7) 2620, 903, 440 QF
8) 3115, 1025, 548 QF

Hey Karthik. That's number two. One more and I get a 1114 shirt. :p

Clinton Bolinger 20-03-2010 13:14

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Detroit District Alliance Selection

1 67-51-1023
2 27-201-1
3 70-245-2834
4 815-247-2137
5 123-1528-818
6 3096-494-2851
7 2620-903-440
8 3115-1025-548

-Clinton-

Kristian Calhoun 20-03-2010 13:18

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Dallas
1. 148 2016 1817
2. 456 1421 2947
3. 1429 704 2352
4. 2950* 1296 3310
5. 1745 2080 2864
6. 3353 1108 418
7. 2953 2848 1785
8. 2943 3005 2283

*1745 declined 2950

Michael Corsetto 20-03-2010 13:27

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kristian Calhoun (Post 939939)
Dallas
1. 148
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

I could have told you that long before Dallas started :p

B_Dubbs 20-03-2010 14:12

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Virginia
1 1676 1086 1418 W
2 975 1731 1908 QF
3 3136 293 1522 QF
4 339 134 435 SF
5 1033 75 612 QF
6 422 122 611 SF
7 617 346 1895 F
8 614 620 2363 QF

Chris is me 20-03-2010 14:37

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Dubbs (Post 939951)
Virginia
1 1676 1086 1418

o.0

Sick alliance. Might need to check these 1086 guys out at the Championship. Again. :)

Akash Rastogi 20-03-2010 16:46

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kristian Calhoun (Post 939939)
Dallas
1. 148 2016 1817

Quote:

Originally Posted by B_Dubbs (Post 939951)
Virginia
1 1676 1086 1418


= Awesome day for New Jersey. Two of our favorite teams showing off some NJ talent. :D

engunneer 20-03-2010 17:04

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 939923)
Midwest Regional
..snip..

LOTS of interpicking, huh.

In Karthik's format

Midwest Regional 2010

1.) 1732 16 3352 W
2.) 1625 111 3135 SF
3.) 2949 2358 3110 F
4.) 1781 71 3067 SF
5.) 2115 648 2704 QF
6.) 101 2709 2781 QF
7.) 3061 2338 2769 QF
8.) 2041 1000 1739 QF


That's my third one :)

Chris is me 20-03-2010 17:49

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by engunneer (Post 939977)
In Karthik's format

Midwest Regional 2010

1.) 1732 16 3352 W
2.) 1625 111 3135 SF
3.) 2949 2358 3110 F
4.) 1781 71 3067 SF
5.) 2115 648 2704 QF
6.) 101 2709 2781 QF
7.) 3061 2338 2769 QF
8.) 2041 1000 1739 QF


That's my third one :)

Heyyyy! Mine was in Karthik's format! I just needed to add that stuff in. Ah well, it got done.

BrendanB 20-03-2010 20:55

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Wow, so 1114's shirts are that valuable huh? :p Karthik, you should offer a $5 discount for those who enter in 3 events and make some money off of this demand! ;)

PaW 21-03-2010 02:22

Re: week 3 results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 939924)
...
Silicon Valley

1 971 254 649 W
2 192 1280 701 SF
3 2868 100 675 F
4 8 604 1323 SF
5 846 973 3129 QF
6 670 3256 1351 QF
7 114 1516 1458 QF
8 2854 668 115 QF

Typo on the 3rd alliance... should be 1868 instead

1 971 254 649 W
2 192 1280 701 SF
3 1868 100 675 F
4 8 604 1323 SF
5 846 973 3129 QF
6 670 3256 1351 QF
7 114 1516 1458 QF
8 2854 668 115 QF

Nigel 21-03-2010 02:27

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 939954)
o.0

Sick alliance. Might need to check these 1086 guys out at the Championship. Again. :)

yeah... the PI oneers sorta crushed our regional... there were a lot of good bots there, but i'm sorta sure they could have taken most alliances by themselves... they did once actually in the qualifier... 14-4 in a elim match i believe... it was intense...

mayhemscout1519 27-03-2010 11:56

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Philadelphia Regional with results:

1.) 341 365 486 W
2.) 272 2753 423 SF
3.) 56 103 1143 F
4.) 1647 433 484 QF
5.) 639 87 1640 SF
6.) 1980 1218 84 QF
7.) 2729 357 1391 QF
8.) 816 1712 709 QF

B_Dubbs 27-03-2010 12:15

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Boston Regional 2010

1) 69 3280 2013 SF
2) 1511 383 2648 F
3) 1757 97 1403 SF
4) 88 1922 1768 W
5) 2043 1153 2084 QF
6) 2590 229 2423 QF
7) 157 155 61 QF
8) 3236 467 11 QF

mayhemscout1519 27-03-2010 12:19

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Boston Regional with results:

1.) 69 3280 2013 SF
2.) 1511 383 2648 F
3.) 1757 97 1403 SF
4.) 88 1922 1768 W
5.) 2043 1153 2084 QF
6.) 2590 229 2423 QF
7.) 157 155 61 QF
8.) 3236 467 11 QF

Chris is me 27-03-2010 12:28

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Troy District:
1.) 469 217 1188 W
2.) 33 910 288 F
3.) 226 573 2163 SF
4.) 2137 1250 2586 SF
5.) 2048 308 302 QF
6.) 3302 815 3322 QF
7.) 2145 503 2832 QF
8.) 2612 2673 1023 QF

Heh, 1188's my mum's school team...

mayhemscout1519 27-03-2010 12:32

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Palmetto Regional with results:

1.) 343 1261 1398 W
2.) 1379 2815 1293 SF
3.) 281* 337 3025 QF
4.) 1225** 2974 3371 QF
5.) 49 945 1758 SF
6.) 1772 1102 2751 F
7.) 3270*** 2187 1959 QF
8.) 804 1287 1319 QF

* 1772 declined 281
** 49 declined 1225
*** 804 declined 3270

Alex Cormier 27-03-2010 13:10

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Waterloo:

AC, P1, P2
1) 1114, 2056, 296 W
2) 3396, 1503, 771 SF
3) 1305, 1310, 3190 F
4) 3161, 610, 1535 QF
5) 781, 2702, 843 SF
6) 1075, 1000, 2609 QF
7) 1565, 2386, 2505 QF
8) 1219, 2625, 772* QF

* replaced with 2220 due to not working

Karthik: That is now 3. Do I get to collect my shirt next week?

mayhemscout1519 27-03-2010 13:11

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Buckeye Regional with results:

1.) 1629 291 1014 SF
2.) 1038 3138 3201 F
3.) 963 3262 378 QF
4.) 2901 451 108 QF
5.) 2252 3010 2506 W
6.) 93 836 3324 SF
7.) 3266 3193 578 QF
8.) 2010 461 2399 QF

ATannahill 27-03-2010 14:21

week 4
 
Oklahoma:

1) 2410 935 1987 W
2) 1939 1209 1742 F
3) 2373 2773 2795 SF
4) 3124 932 2842 SF
5) 1750 2395 476 QF
6) 2369 1710 2354 QF
7) 2388 2341 3144 QF
8) 2398 31 2352 QF

Long Island:

1) 514 870 3171 F
2) 271 358 263 W
3) 1626 545 369 SF
4) 2849 564 522 QF
5) 287 1468 3137 SF
6) 1803 2872 329 QF
7) 2869 28 270 QF
8) 353 527 1606 QF

Seattle:

1) 3221 2147 492 SF
2) 2046 1258 2471 SF
3) 488 2557 2990 W
4) 2915 2898 948 F
5) 3049 1983 2660 QF
6) 1318 1899 3393 QF
7) 2910 1359 3070 QF
8) 2976 360 1510 QF

I found these by looking at the match list, rankings and blurred webcast. The bolded teams may be in the wrong order, the others I am sure about.

Los Angeles

1) 330 1717 1452 W
2) 190 233 2429 SF
3) 294 968 980 F
4) 1388 2496 2584 SF
5) 687 599 3328 QF
6) 1160 1197 1671 QF
7) 3021 2272 207 QF
8) 2637 1515 995 QF

Hawaii

1) 359 368 2467 W
2) 2437 2090 2455 F
3) 2460 2348 203 SF
4) 2438 2443 2504 SF
5) 2465 2445 2441 QF
6) 2439* 1920 1056 QF
7) 3306 2444 2896 QF
8) 3008 2477 1548 QF

*2439 declined 2465

Ryan Simpson 27-03-2010 16:02

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Los Angeles:

1. 330 1717 1452 W
2. 190 233 2429 SF
3. 294 968 980 F
4. 1388 2496 2584 SF
5. 687 599 3328 QF
6. 1160 1197 1671 QF
7. 3021 2272 207 QF
8. 2637 1515 995 QF

Ryan Simpson 27-03-2010 16:16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayhemscout1519 (Post 943670)
Philadelphia Regional without results:

1. 341 365 486
2. 272 2753 423
3. 56 103 1143
4. 1647 433 484
5. 639 87 1640
6. 1980 1218 84
7. 2729 357 1391
8. 816 1712 709

With Results:

1. 341 365 486 W
2. 272 2753 423 SF
3. 56 103 1143 F
4. 1647 433 484 QF
5. 639 87 1640 SF
6. 1980 1218 84 QF
7. 2729 357 1391 QF
8. 816 1712 709 QF

ATannahill 27-03-2010 16:22

Philly
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayhemscout1519 (Post 943670)
Philadelphia Regional without results:

1. 341 365 486
2. 272 2753 423
3. 56 103 1143
4. 1647 433 484
5. 639 87 1640
6. 1980 1218 84
7. 2729 357 1391
8. 816 1712 709

1-W
2-SF
3-F
4-QF
5-SF
6-QF
7-QF
8-QF

ATannahill 27-03-2010 16:23

Troy
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 943684)
Troy District:
1.) 469 217 1188
2.) 33 910 288
3.) 226 573 2163
4.) 2137 1250 2586
5.) 2048 308 302
6.) 3302 815 3322
7.) 2145 503 2832
8.) 2612 2673 1023

Heh, 1188's my mum's school team...

1-W
2-F
3-SF
4-SF
5-QF
6-QF
7-QF
8-QF

bigbeezy 27-03-2010 16:47

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
any news from colorado? they aren't updating match results on the FIRST website

EricH 27-03-2010 16:51

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbeezy (Post 943758)
any news from colorado? they aren't updating match results on the FIRST website

I think they have lousy or no internet, so they update very rarely.

Ryan Simpson 27-03-2010 17:16

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayhemscout1519 (Post 943687)
Palmetto Regional without results:

1.) 343 1261 1398
2.) 1379 2815 1293
3.) 281* 337 3025
4.) 1225** 2974 3371
5.) 49 945 1758
6.) 1772 1102 2751
7.) 3270*** 2187 1959
8.) 804 1287 1319

* 1772 declined 281
** 49 declined 1225
*** 804 declined 3270

With Results:

1.) 343 1261 1398 W
2.) 1379 2815 1293 SF
3.) 281* 337 3025 QF
4.) 1225** 2974 3371 QF
5.) 49 945 1758 SF
6.) 1772 1102 2751 F
7.) 3270*** 2187 1959 QF
8.) 804 1287 1319 QF

* 1772 declined 281
** 49 declined 1225
*** 804 declined 3270

ATannahill 27-03-2010 17:17

Palmetto
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayhemscout1519 (Post 943687)
Palmetto Regional without results:

1.) 343 1261 1398
2.) 1379 2815 1293
3.) 281* 337 3025
4.) 1225** 2974 3371
5.) 49 945 1758
6.) 1772 1102 2751
7.) 3270*** 2187 1959
8.) 804 1287 1319

* 1772 declined 281
** 49 declined 1225
*** 804 declined 3270


1-W
2-SF
3-QF
4-QF
5-SF
6-F
7-QF
8-QF

ATannahill 27-03-2010 17:20

Buckeye
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayhemscout1519 (Post 943696)
Buckeye Regional without results:

1.) 1629 291 1014
2.) 1038 3138 3201
3.) 963 3262 378
4.) 2901 451 108
5.) 2252 3010 2506
6.) 93 836 3324
7.) 3266 3193 578
8.) 2010 461 2399


1-SF
2-F
3-QF
4-QF
5-W
6-SF
7-QF
8-QF

PaW 27-03-2010 17:52

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Microsoft Seattle Regional.
No results yet... elims still in progress.

3221 2147 492
2046 2471 1258
488 2557 2990
2915 2898* 948
3049 1983 2660
1318 3393 1899
2910 3070 1359
2976 360 1510

2898 originally 6th seed

Ryan Simpson 27-03-2010 17:55

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Hawaii:

1. 359 368 2467 W
2. 2437 2090 2455 F
3. 2460 2348 203 SF
4. 2438 2443 2504 SF
5. 2465 2445 2441 QF
6. 2439* 1920 1056 QF
7. 3306 2444 2896 QF
8. 3008 2477 1548 QF

*2439 declined 2465

Joe Ross 28-03-2010 20:00

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryan Simpson (Post 943740)
Los Angeles:

1. 330 1717 1452 W
2. 190 233 2429 SF
3. 294 968 980 F
4. 1388 2496 2584 SF
5. 687 599 3328 QF
6. 1160 1197 1671 QF
7. 3021 2272 207 QF
8. 2637 1515 995 QF

In the #8 alliance, 995 was replaced by the first backup robot, 1138, prior to the first match of the eliminations.

Joe J. 28-03-2010 20:10

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 943684)
Troy District:
1.) 469 217 1188 W
2.) 33 910 288 F
3.) 226 573 2163 SF
4.) 2137 1250 2586 SF
5.) 2048 308 302 QF
6.) 3302 815 3322 QF
7.) 2145 503 2832 QF
8.) 2612 2673 1023 QF

Just a note 2612 declined when selected by 2048

penguinfrk 28-03-2010 23:35

Re: 2010 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PaW (Post 943774)
Microsoft Seattle Regional.
No results yet... elims still in progress.

3221 2147 492
2046 2471 1258
488 2557 2990
2915 2898* 948
3049 1983 2660
1318 3393 1899
2910 3070 1359
2976 360 1510

2898 originally 6th seed

Event: 2010 Microsoft Seattle Regional

With results:
3221 2147 492 SF
2046 2471 1258 SF
488 2557 2990 W
2915 2898 948 F
3049 1983 2660 QF
1318 3393 1899 QF
2910 3070 1359 QF
2976 360 1510 QF


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi