Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Best 2010 Lifter (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84012)

TheFish 08-03-2010 08:26

Best 2010 Lifter
 
So I'm just getting into Robotics and don't really know who to look for as far as teams goes.

What have you guys seen from Week 1 on the best lifting team? (I'm going to post another question about scoring/kicking so let's keep this thread just to the end-game.

Thanks,
TheFish

MotorHead 08-03-2010 09:04

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Our team went to the finals this weekend with team 78, Air Strike, at the Granite State Regional. They could consistently lift in under 15 seconds. The lift is an arm that deploys and grabs the vertical pole. A powered wheel then rotates and 'climbs' up the pole. I believe there is some video already around on CD showing it.

Simply a thing of beauty to watch it operate.

Jeffy 08-03-2010 09:22

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
525 could consistantly hang. Along with 1982 and 1825.

nikeairmancurry 08-03-2010 09:26

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
From watching on webcasts on Friday and watching the Kettering district regional live, I have come up with a good list of lifters that were consistant, yet quick.

78- I do agree with the previous post, they have a very effective hanger and it's easy to pull off.

525- watching the KC regional was exciting, but when these guys played you waited for the last 20 secs to come. They sit right on the bump and take hold on the top bar, and there off. Most times to make the full lift I took about 10-12 secs. The only problem is they have to get on the bump, I forsee teams trying to push them off or try to block the bump in the future.

2337- The enginerds always have something out of the box on there robot, since there rookie year. This year they have the coolest looking chin-up robot I've seen. They have a huge system that sits on top of the base and it kicks up after they set-up under the bar. It's vey effective, as if only of the two hooks grabs hold it stills gets two points for there alliance. I believe in the 8 matches I watched them play on Saturday, they hung for 2 points 7 times.

27/33-My favorite two hangers are very similar and twice they hung in the same match making it very fun to watch. The easiest way to describe these lifters is to say that, they are close to the likes of what 217/148 had. Both lighting quick and sometimes both lifted up, in under 10 secs. Yet the bees (33) took it one step further by having message written on the bottom of the robot for the crowd to see after they hung themselves. Whether it being "Bee happy!" or "Finals baby!" both these robots have almost perfected the art and probably will continue to do it every match.

Koko Ed 08-03-2010 09:49

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
FLR had so many good ones but I think the one that really stood out were 1551 (check out the video from YNN who could hang consistently and fast every match and that ability drove them to the top seed. Team 229 can hang in few seconds. Rookie team 3157 , 1559, 1241 and 1507 were also tremendous hangers.
There were probably a dozen robots at FLR that could hang. We had several matches with multiple robots hanging. As many as three in some matches.
We manage to hang in the last match for the first time right at the end of the match but unfortunate so did 1551 (they would have won anyways even if they didn't make it up).

Chris is me 08-03-2010 09:56

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
1625's lifter was one of my favorites. A few more seconds and they would have tied match 3, I bet. The actual lifting motion is short, getting in place with defense isn't. (Defense before they touch the tower, of course).

148 and 217 _had_ good systems.

2062, 2079 seem pretty neat.

I want to scrap my team's system for a simpler to control system due to stability issues in favor of tunneling...

Dave Scheck 08-03-2010 10:32

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikeairmancurry (Post 933499)
27/33-My favorite two hangers are very similar and twice they hung in the same match making it very fun to watch. The easiest way to describe these lifters is to say that, they are close to the likes of what 217/148 had. Both lighting quick and sometimes both lifted up, in under 10 secs. Yet the bees (33) took it one step further by having message written on the bottom of the robot for the crowd to see after they hung themselves. Whether it being "Bee happy!" or "Finals baby!" both these robots have almost perfected the art and probably will continue to do it every match.

I will echo that. I was working on autonomous and the people watching the webcast called over to me and said that I had to check out 27 hanging. I was amazed. It was a great example of how quickly elevation could be accomplished. I stuck around a little longer and watched 33 do something very similar (they were hanging with about 12 seconds left in the match at one point!). The thing that was most impressive was the speed at which both teams went from driving around to hanging. They took the complexity out of lining up and were up in no time. Great job to both 27/33. I can't wait to get a close look at both in Atlanta.

Andrew Schreiber 08-03-2010 10:45

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikeairmancurry (Post 933499)
2337- The enginerds always have something out of the box on there robot, since there rookie year. This year they have the coolest looking chin-up robot I've seen. They have a huge system that sits on top of the base and it kicks up after they set-up under the bar. It's vey effective, as if only of the two hooks grabs hold it stills gets two points for there alliance. I believe in the 8 matches I watched them play on Saturday, they hung for 2 points 7 times.

Just a heads up on why it is so large, that thing is designed so that anyone that could normally hang (off the top bar) can hang off of it instead. The robot was designed to facilitate a double suspension.

And, I would like it noted, the upper structure is most definitely inside the box (except in the last 20 seconds). We don't want no penalties! ;)

thefro526 08-03-2010 10:46

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
The best lifter at The New Jersey Regional was 25 without a doubt. Their mechanism was both unique and fast, but I won't go into too much detail here. I believed it was dubbed "The Strong Man Hang" by the announcer at NJ...

BrendanB 08-03-2010 11:12

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 933518)
148 and 217 _had_ good systems.

Are you saying this because you haven't seen them play in an official match? Or did I miss something about a redesign!?!?!:ahh:

Agree with team 78's beautiful, quick design. I also liked team 151's.

nikeairmancurry 08-03-2010 11:14

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 933550)
Just a heads up on why it is so large, that thing is designed so that anyone that could normally hang (off the top bar) can hang off of it instead. The robot was designed to facilitate a double suspension.

And, I would like it noted, the upper structure is most definitely inside the box (except in the last 20 seconds). We don't want no penalties! ;)

Lol... What I meant by outside the box was, something completely different than most... Kinda like the boot idea from 2008..

Chris is me 08-03-2010 11:15

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BrendanB (Post 933562)
Are you saying this because you haven't seen them play in an official match? Or did I miss something about a redesign!?!?!:ahh:

Both teams removed their hanging arms and used the weight toward strengthening their drivetrain and lowering their CG.

nikeairmancurry 08-03-2010 11:16

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BrendanB (Post 933562)
Are you saying this because you haven't seen them play in an official match? Or did I miss something about a redesign!?!?!:ahh:

Agree with team 78's beautiful, quick design. I also liked team 151's.

Both teams decided to do away with the hangers for drivetrain strenght

johnr 08-03-2010 11:28

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
There is something else about 2337. When they lock on there is this sound. It just sounds-- strong. I was in the pits and just knew it was them. I don't remember, and maybe someone from 2337 could answer this, could a team like 27/33 lock onto you and then you lift or is your structure made out of square tubing?

Clinton Bolinger 08-03-2010 12:07

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
When we go to lock on to the tower we have two pins that are pulled and extend our supports that touch the vertical supports of the tower, that is the first sound you hear. Then our two hooks slam on to the horizontal support and then falls into place. At that point any one that can lift off the horizontal bars of the tower can begin hooking on to us at the same time we lift.

Our structure is made out of 1.5" diameter tube with 0.083" wall thickness, we currently have vertical pole and have talk about having vertical lifter on us. Our only concern is the torque that would be applied to our vertical supports and whether or not it could handle it. With a 24" arm and a 150 lb robot the torque we would see on our vertical supports would be some where around 3600 in*lbs. We are going to test that in a controlled environment before trying it on the field.

I will try to do my best to get some action shot and maybe even some videos posted some time this week.

-Clinton-

Andrew Schreiber 08-03-2010 12:09

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnr (Post 933571)
There is something else about 2337. When they lock on there is this sound. It just sounds-- strong. I was in the pits and just knew it was them. I don't remember, and maybe someone from 2337 could answer this, could a team like 27/33 lock onto you and then you lift or is your structure made out of square tubing?

2337's lifter has a series of pins. When the lifter raises up one set of pins is pulled out of place releasing the lower supports, once the hooks connect (or more accurately swing past a certain point) it releases some pins out which is what lets the upper structure slide up and down on the support poles. The sound could also be the mass of the structure hitting the tower, there is a lot of mass moving quickly and all the bodies are hollow. Either way, it is a nice sound no?

To answer your next question; not as the system works now. One of the parents did some math and figured out that the load on the vertical supports exerted by 27/33 style lifters is ~2x what the structure can support. Realistically the vertical support beams don't support any of the robots hanging off of us it is only the upper pseudo tower that is supporting additional weight. This MAY change but I do not know.

3rd: Those poles are the same diameter as the tower so that if a hook works on the tower it will work on the pseudo tower.

Hope I answered your questions.

EDIT: Clinton beat me.

maltz1881 08-03-2010 12:19

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
No doubt about it Teams 2337, 27 and 33 have the best designs when it comes to hanging. Team 2337 the NERDS have the best design to have others hang from them.

Daniel_LaFleur 08-03-2010 12:33

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by maltz1881 (Post 933591)
No doubt about it Teams 2337, 27 and 33 have the best designs when it comes to hanging. Team 2337 the NERDS have the best design to have others hang from them.

Maybe your opinion :P (I havent seen them so I can't say for sure)

... But I'd match teams 78 and 151 hanging systems up against just about anyones. Quick and effecient.

Graham Donaldson 08-03-2010 13:12

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Some really good hangers at NJ that pop into my head: 25 (a very similar setup to 148, even though they've taken theirs off), 1672, 1676 (I may be biased but ours was one of the better ones there). 2016 and 2753 weren't too shabby either.

Cory 08-03-2010 13:53

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thefro526 (Post 933552)
The best lifter at The New Jersey Regional was 25 without a doubt. Their mechanism was both unique and fast, but I won't go into too much detail here. I believed it was dubbed "The Strong Man Hang" by the announcer at NJ...

25 seemed to have problems with hanging in the eliminations at Jersey. It looked like their mechanism that slid them up the bar after rotating up failed to go up high enough.

thefro526 08-03-2010 14:09

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 933656)
25 seemed to have problems with hanging in the eliminations at Jersey. It looked like their mechanism that slid them up the bar after rotating up failed to go up high enough.

In the matches I saw 25 play, I only saw them miss one hang which was when they ran out of time and missed by about 1/2" or so.

I think they hung in one of the finals matches against us but I'm not entirely sure.

nuggetsyl 08-03-2010 14:23

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 933656)
25 seemed to have problems with hanging in the eliminations at Jersey. It looked like their mechanism that slid them up the bar after rotating up failed to go up high enough.

During the very gentle playoff matches in nj (hehe) A bar bent that kept us from getting up all the way. We will have a much stronger one build for las vegas.

Graham Donaldson 08-03-2010 14:46

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
One of the other problems, maybe in the final match, was that the post on the inside of the bar (25'd be able to describe it better) wasn't flush up against it, and became a sort of hypotenuse, meaning they couldn't get up all the way.

Brandon_L 08-03-2010 18:06

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
We, along with 2016, are tied for most lifts in NJ. We coulda had more but had SO many problems in the elims, we didn't even get one hang in.

I didn't get a chance to see 2016's but heard it was good.

Noah Booth 08-03-2010 18:18

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
The best I have seen by far is team 78 at Manchester. their arm was fast and efficient and did not take away from the rest of the game. team 151 also lifted quite well. does anyone have a video of team 25. I have heard so much about them on cd but not seen any media.

jblay 08-03-2010 18:34

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
At NJ 25 had an awesome hanger. 2016 and 2753 had two awesome telescoping arms that were really quite brilliant and we may have to replicate the idea in the future.

1717 who hasn't been seen by most because sandiego wasn't web casted has an amazingly fast and cool hanger
they hang at the end of this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-e7_Cyp8iA

pfreivald 08-03-2010 18:51

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 933513)
We manage to hang in the last match for the first time right at the end of the match but unfortunate so did 1551 (they would have won anyways even if they didn't make it up).

...but we just had to, man. It's what we were born to do. :D

If I may brag a moment (because in six years I've never had a *robot* to truly brag about, even if I've had a team that is awesome), I believe that 22 hanging points puts us at the top of the ladder for week one...

But that said, 1717's lift is *freaking amazing*. I love it. It's the only one I've seen so far that might be faster than ours.

Well done, 1717, well done.

enigmatic 08-03-2010 18:55

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Our team currently cannot hang (which we might be changing) but i still only saw one team at kettering that i would feel comfortable attempting to suspend from and that was the 2337

Akash Rastogi 08-03-2010 18:55

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
25 hands down.

I will toot 11's horn about speedy hanging once I have video (we only hung once in NJ and didn't have it set to raise high enough)

rocknthehawk 08-03-2010 20:08

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
78 had an impressive lift.

I'd have to say 126....but I'm a bit biased.

cziggy343 08-03-2010 20:17

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
I feel like im biased too... but even though we haven't been to a regional, ours can release, grab, and hang in under 15 sec. im hoping that thursday this week i will actually be able to say on a competition field that it did that well:D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHmRrZ9asEo

in this video, we climb in about ten seconds... and the motor was not turned all the way up (poor brent was a little slow with the controls :rolleyes: )

Dargel1625 08-03-2010 20:33

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
525's lifter was always fun to watch and was quite consistent. Once they got up onto the bump in the last 20 seconds it was basically a guarantee. Although it ended up dooming us in the 3rd finals match it was still my favorite. ;)

EDIT: After seeing the video of 1717's lift, I must say it is extremely impressive as well!

Clinton Bolinger 09-03-2010 00:00

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by enigmatic (Post 933955)
Our team currently cannot hang (which we might be changing) but i still only saw one team at kettering that i would feel comfortable attempting to suspend from and that was the 2337

I posted some picture of our robot in the Suspension Thread:

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...8&postcount=39

Enjoy!

-Clinton-

Tom Bottiglieri 09-03-2010 01:17

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
I've heard murmurs of a 4 CIM hang.



:eek:

Koko Ed 09-03-2010 07:04

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 933954)
...but we just had to, man. It's what we were born to do. :D

If I may brag a moment (because in six years I've never had a *robot* to truly brag about, even if I've had a team that is awesome), I believe that 22 hanging points puts us at the top of the ladder for week one...

But that said, 1717's lift is *freaking amazing*. I love it. It's the only one I've seen so far that might be faster than ours.

Well done, 1717, well done.

COOL!
Look what I found on Facebook.
Good view of both robots hanging in the last match.

thefro526 09-03-2010 09:41

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Also, I've got to mention 2016 in here. They were our alliance partners in NJ and hung extremely well and could clear the platform by 8" or more. I'd watch out for them in Dallas.

Joe Ross 09-03-2010 10:18

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBot (Post 934219)
I've heard murmurs of a 4 CIM hang.

I'm sure 254's robot is a great lifter. We've come to expect nothing less. However, this thread is about the best lifter, and I'm from Missouri, so show me. You're about 5 weeks too late for teasers.

It should have been obvious to anyone who's been around since 2004 that 254 would lift using their drive transmissions, but for those who are newer, now you know.

pfreivald 09-03-2010 11:30

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 934284)
COOL!
Look what I found on Facebook.
Good view of both robots hanging in the last match.

Sweet!

Thanks!

Tom Bottiglieri 09-03-2010 11:38

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Ross (Post 934376)
It should have been obvious to anyone who's been around since 2004 that 254 would lift using their drive transmissions, but for those who are newer, now you know.

I wasn't talking about 254. Can I not compliment another team?

Koko Ed 09-03-2010 13:11

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 934419)
Sweet!

Thanks!

Our coach, Jack, wanted video of the last match in the worst way.
They are very proud of finally being able to hang.

Mike Soukup 09-03-2010 19:45

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBot (Post 934219)
I've heard murmurs of a 4 CIM hang.

I've seen said hang. Very impressive. Fastest I've seen so far.

pfreivald 09-03-2010 20:52

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Soukup (Post 934775)
I've seen said hang. Very impressive. Fastest I've seen so far.

How fast?

Akash Rastogi 09-03-2010 20:58

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBot (Post 934219)
I've heard murmurs of a 4 CIM hang.



:eek:

Those folks up north sure are crazy :rolleyes:

Cory 09-03-2010 21:05

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 934809)
How fast?

Faster than anything that was seen in week 1...by a lot.

pfreivald 09-03-2010 21:14

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 934822)
Faster than anything that was seen in week 1...by a lot.

So, under four seconds? Niiiiiiiice!

Chris is me 09-03-2010 21:43

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pfreivald (Post 934834)
So, under four seconds? Niiiiiiiice!

I've seen 2.5 second hangs in week 1.

Now, just look at 2004 and it's pretty obvious who these posters are talking about. They should be off the ground in a blink.

Akash Rastogi 09-03-2010 21:58

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 934858)
I've seen 2.5 second hangs in week 1.

Now, just look at 2004 and it's pretty obvious who these posters are talking about. They should be off the ground in a blink.

Chris and I timed it using the videos, it was like 16 or so inches in about 1.5 seconds, correct Chris?

Chris is me 09-03-2010 21:59

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 934873)
Chris and I timed it using the videos, it was like 16 or so inches in about 1.5 seconds, correct Chris?

Yup, and that's about as far as they'd need to pull with a straight hang. And they had drills rather than CIMs then right?

apalrd 09-03-2010 22:06

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 934874)
Yup, and that's about as far as they'd need to pull with a straight hang. And they had drills rather than CIMs then right?

Sorta. They had 2 F-p, 2 Bosch drill motors, and 2 CIMs (+ some other less powerful motors). So they could have had drills or CIM's.

s_forbes 09-03-2010 22:23

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
In my opinion the time it takes to hang (while important) doesn't seem to be as large of a factor as the time it takes to line up for a hang. This is one of the reasons I was for a vertical pole hanging robot from the beginning; if the front of your mechanism is shaped right you can just drive straight at the pole and be set to flip yourself up. If you pull power off your drivetrain to do it, and have the hanging routine sensor-activated to begin as soon as you are latched on, you could hold off of going to hang until the last few seconds of the match. (I don't know if anyone will do this, but it's fun to dream)


That said, 219 has one of my favorite lifting mechanisms so far... they flip upsidedown onto the platform. I only caught it once during the webcast, if anyone has more video I'd love to see it.

Akash Rastogi 10-03-2010 01:55

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by apalrd (Post 934881)
Sorta. They had 2 F-p, 2 Bosch drill motors, and 2 CIMs (+ some other less powerful motors). So they could have had drills or CIM's.

The only thing Chris and I wondered about was how much the Poof 04 bot swung around while it was being pulled up, it seemed a bit dangerous. I'm sure they thought about how to stabilize the bot though for Breakaway, if they're using the same method that is.

Although I'm trying to wonder why it wouldn't be used, it was mad fast. For anyone who doesn't know what Chris and I are referring to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZuUdaCLZzg

Aren_Hill 10-03-2010 02:20

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
still not as fast as a servo twitching :)

thefro526 10-03-2010 09:09

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 935014)
The only thing Chris and I wondered about was how much the Poof 04 bot swung around while it was being pulled up, it seemed a bit dangerous. I'm sure they thought about how to stabilize the bot though for Breakaway, if they're using the same method that is.

Although I'm trying to wonder why it wouldn't be used, it was mad fast. For anyone who doesn't know what Chris and I are referring to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZuUdaCLZzg

Wow.

That's an awesome find Stogi. 254's '04 bot is still one of my Favorite robots to date.

Tom Bottiglieri 12-03-2010 15:45

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Soukup (Post 934775)
I've seen said hang. Very impressive. Fastest I've seen so far.

I guess the cat's out of the bag now... If anyone has seen 1114 at Pittsburgh, they are hanging with 4 CIMs and man is it FASSSST.

henryBsick 12-03-2010 16:42

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Bottiglieri (Post 936018)
I guess the cat's out of the bag now... If anyone has seen 1114 at Pittsburgh, they are hanging with 4 CIMs and man is it FASSSST.

So its 4 CIMs eh?
I must agree, this is the best I have seen to date.

I wonder what a similar design using stored energy to articulate would be like. Time is never a factor then... as long as you release for 'curl' before t=0.


Kudos 1114, your machine in all aspects is amazing again.

ttldomination 12-03-2010 17:11

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Yeah, i just watched their last match. I saw them kick a ball and hang in all of like 5 seconds. Amazing, quick machine.

AmoryG 12-03-2010 17:23

Re: Best 2010 Lifter
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by s_forbes (Post 934902)
In my opinion the time it takes to hang (while important) doesn't seem to be as large of a factor as the time it takes to line up for a hang. This is one of the reasons I was for a vertical pole hanging robot from the beginning; if the front of your mechanism is shaped right you can just drive straight at the pole and be set to flip yourself up. If you pull power off your drivetrain to do it, and have the hanging routine sensor-activated to begin as soon as you are latched on, you could hold off of going to hang until the last few seconds of the match. (I don't know if anyone will do this, but it's fun to dream)


That said, 219 has one of my favorite lifting mechanisms so far... they flip upsidedown onto the platform. I only caught it once during the webcast, if anyone has more video I'd love to see it.

Very true. I was watching Pittsburg's last 3 matches and got to see 1114 line itself up and get a bonus 2 points in what was probably the last 4 seconds of the match. I didn't expect it would be that fast, so I kind of missed what it actually did. :(


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi