Chief Delphi - Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)

- - Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84098)

Conor Ryan

10-03-2010 13:45

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Do any teams have their regional scouting data available for us to take a look at to make a proper Excel sheet?

BrendanB

10-03-2010 13:52

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conor Ryan (Post 935218)

Do any teams have their regional scouting data available for us to take a look at to make a proper Excel sheet?

BAE/team 1519's scouting data can be found here- http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=83940

coldfusion1279

10-03-2010 14:02

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Quote:

Originally Posted by ks_mumupsi (Post 935205)

All...

I noticed this with atleast the NJ regional do not know about the others, however you cannot take the Seeding Score as is from FIRST....

FIRST included the Elimination matches for some reason in the seeding score section, because I looked at our seeding score and you need to eliminate teams from elimination matches or adjust their seeding score for true calculations.

Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but from the points I added up this is what I gathered.

-ks

I am not sure exactly what you are referring to. The (corrected) post by Jee7s above is the correct adjusted ranking.

The rankings on FIRST's website are correct also:

http://www2.usfirst.org/2010comp/eve.../rankings.html

It doesn't look like the elims score was included in the final SS, otherwise 25's score would be way higher.

Daniel_LaFleur

10-03-2010 14:12

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessica Boucher (Post 934884)

I just added BAE into a different tab. Feel free to "do the math".

Your 'wins' data for BAE is incorrect.

team 1729 had 5 wins, 3 losses and 2 ties (shown here

Ross	10-03-2010 22:08

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

The wins for Team #3074 are also incorrect.

http://www.thebluealliance.net/tbatv/team/3074

Jessica Boucher

16-03-2010 10:58

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

If you see inconsistency, I encourage you to post a new spreadsheet in the format that Billfred has started and I will be happy to replace it. Thanks!

Stephen Kowski

16-03-2010 12:40

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadeAtMidnight (Post 934852)

But teams might have played differently with the extra 5 point bonus, so I'm not sure the scores can be compared.

You are absolutely correct! Why score for yourself when you can willing take penalties (inadvertent rolling on the ball) and end up with the same score at the end.

These changes had a huge impact and shouldn't be evaluated as only statistics in a chart.

StevenB

17-03-2010 00:15

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

1 Attachment(s)

Attached is the updated sheet for the BAE Systems Granite State Regional. None of the top six spots changed, and the big (+/- 10) changes were in the middle of the pack, where they would have no real effect. The average ranking change was 3.29 places, the median was 2.

Also, note that the "average change" box needs to use the absolute value of the ranking changes, not the average of the changes themselves (which should always be 0).

Jessica Boucher

17-03-2010 22:57

Re: Team Update 16 applied to 2010 regional data

Updated at http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?k...VTc Gc&hl=en;

Thank you!

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:05.

Page 2 of 2

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page