Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

Having played two events, Team 2337 seems to be leading the pack... for now

2337 - 104 points (Qualified District Champs; AA)
217 - 75 points (Qualified District Champs + EI; CT)
1918 - 75 points (TC district champ, MQ, CT)
67 - 73 points (Qualified District Champs; KU)
573 - 68 points (Qualified District Champs; AA)
2645 - 62 points (Qual TC champ)
862 - 47 points
247 - 37 points (Qualified EI; AA)
322 - 37 points (Two Events)
201 - 29 points
548 - 27 points (Qualified Chairman's: KU)
326 - 24 points
818 - 11 points

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

2337 - 104 points (Qualified District Champs; AA)
67 - 78 points (Qualified District Champs; KU)
217 - 75 points (Qualified District Champs + EI; CT)
1918 - 75 points (TC district champ, MQ, CT)
573 - 68 points (Qualified District Champs; AA)
2645 - 62 points (Qual TC champ)
862 - 47 points
247 - 46 points (Qualified EI; AA)
322 - 36 points (Two Events)
201 - 29 points
548 - 28 points (Qualified Chairman's: KU)
326 - 25 points
818 - 11 points

I have different numbers.

-Clinton-

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

For 548, I included 10 points for Chairman's award. Awards get points as well as playing points.

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

Why can't you guys just hold your horses? The person who compiles the rankings has a day job. FiM is 100% volunteers, but even though they aren't getting paid, they are doing their best to insure that the posted results are accurate - that in the face of having to pour through the data just to come up with win/loss records and not being able to discern from the FIRST site who were the captain's first and second picks.

All you are doing here is to compound their problem with even more misinformation!

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

Ahh...good catch. I forgot we won the Quality Award also (+5pts).

Thanks!

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

How does the tracking of approximate FiM stats in a CD thread (for fun) affect anyone else's job?

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

A better question is: How will it affect FiM if the volunteer decides to quit doing it?

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

If FiM's volunteer decided to quit doing a job that needs to be done to determine the fate of FRC teams around the state just because some guys on Chief Delphi wanted to see how well they were doing relative to other teams, I'd question the decision to have that volunteer doing anything that has any impact on anyone.

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

I love the FiM system and appreciate the fact that it runs on volunteer power. However, for planning/logistics purposes, anything that lets teams know where they stand r.e. qualifying for State or the Championship is helpful.

Its also fun to speculate & helpful to know who you can expect to see at State.

I believe that the cutoff for State last year was around 40 points. I expect that this year will be about the same.

Unfortunately, the info on the FIRST site doesn't go deep enough for us to generate statewide points/standings.

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

This maybe a tad bit more helpful:

http://www.firstinmichigan.org/stati...esults_Overall

Congrats to Team 2619 ... Ranked #1 at the end of week 2.

-Clinton-

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

Check out this out, team 51 is in 51st place lol :p

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

I would expect that the cutoff would be a little higher this year, because there are more teams with auto-bids to the championship, so less teams can go just on points alone.

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

Wow...my team is in 31st place. Only 40 points though. lol

I'm so glad we won Rookie All-Star at Kettering. Whew! lol

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

i have a feeling the cutoff point will be 56. anyone else have a prediction?

Re: State Rankings...Lets do it ourselves.
 

42