![]() |
Re: FIRST Rule Changes
Quote:
Personally, if I were a looper who'd worked that hard to determine and implement the strategy, I'd consider changing the rule to be unfair. All of us had the equal equal opportunity to do it, so personally I see no reason to expect an equal outcome if we didn't take the same course. They, I presume (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), chose that course based in part on the offensive advantage. Changing it now throws off their cost-benefit analysis in a way that affects them considerably more than the rest of the population. To me that seems more unfair than allowing them to take advantage of a rule that all of us could have attempted equally. Now, would I like it if I could stop them? Well, that depends who's alliance they're on. :P But in all honesty, no, because I hope that one day when I help build an awesome gamebreaker, no one will change the game for me. Just my $0.02. If you'd like to see equal opportunity in ball return, more power to you, I'm just not sure it's actually in line with GDC intentions. (And I believe this is historically why rules are changed: to bring them more in line with their intention, not to reflect a change in their goal. I could be wrong, of course.) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi