Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2010 Regional Stats (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84433)

Mark McLeod 03-04-2010 19:28

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Michigan State really proved that practice makes perfect. Every team there had at least two prior events under their belt and the Qualification scores were quite high.
I expect we'll see a bit of this in Atlanta...

Here are the average combined Qualification & Elimination match scores by event (blue + red alliance score).

-----Avg----Avg
Wk-Qual---Elim ---- Event
5 --- 16.5 --- 24.2 ---- Michigan State Championship
5 ---- 8.6 --- 16.1 ---- Greater Toronto Regional
4 --- 10.3 --- 15.2 ---- Troy District
5 ---- 9.2 --- 14.9 ---- Connecticut Regional
3 ---- 6.5 --- 14.7 ---- Silicon Valley Regional
4 ---- 6.8 --- 14.5 ---- Los Angeles Regional
5 ---- 8.5 --- 13.7 ---- Las Vegas Regional
5 ---- 6.7 --- 13.3 ---- North Carolina Regional
4 ---- 6.6 --- 13.1 ---- Boston Regional
1 ---- 6.2 --- 13.1 ---- Kettering District
3 ---- 8.0 --- 12.9 ---- Detroit District
4 ---- 9.0 --- 12.8 ---- Philadelphia Regional
2 ---- 4.4 --- 12.7 ---- Cass Tech District
5 ---- 6.5 --- 12.7 ---- Minnesota 10000 Lakes Regional
4 ---- 9.9 --- 12.5 ---- Waterloo Regional
5 ---- 4.9 --- 12.5 ---- Minnesota North Star Regional
1 ---- 5.6 --- 12.5 ---- New Jersey Regional
3 ---- 6.1 --- 12.3 ---- Midwest Regional
5 ---- 4.7 --- 12.1 ---- Lone Star Regional
3 ---- 9.1 --- 11.8 ---- West Michigan District
4 ---- 6.0 --- 11.8 ---- SBPLI Long Island Regional
1 ---- 5.1 --- 11.8 ---- BAE Granite State Regional
3 ---- 4.9 --- 11.8 ---- Dallas Regional
5 ---- 6.6 --- 11.7 ---- Sacramento Regional
3 ---- 5.6 --- 10.9 ---- Virginia Regional
2 ---- 6.5 --- 10.7 ---- Florida Regional
4 ---- 6.2 --- 10.7 ---- Hawaii Regional
2 ---- 7.0 --- 10.6 ---- Wisconsin Regional
2 ---- 5.7 --- 10.6 ---- Chesapeake Regional
2 ---- 4.7 --- 10.5 ---- Arizona Regional
2 ---- 5.2 --- 10.4 ---- Ann Arbor District
3 ---- 7.3 --- 10.3 ---- Boilermaker Regional
1 ---- 5.2 --- 10.2 ---- Greater Kansas City Regional
2 ---- 7.3 --- 10.0 ---- Pittsburgh Regional
1 ---- 5.6 ---- 9.9 ---- Finger Lakes Regional
4 ---- 4.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Oklahoma Regional
4 ---- 5.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Buckeye Regional
4 ---- 4.5 ---- 9.6 ---- Microsoft Seattle Regional
3 ---- 7.4 ---- 9.4 ---- St. Louis Regional
4 ---- 4.3 ---- 9.2 ---- Colorado Regional
4 ---- 5.9 ---- 8.7 ---- Palmetto Regional
2 ---- 3.7 ---- 8.7 ---- New York City Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 8.4 ---- San Diego Regional
1 ---- 3.3 ---- 8.1 ---- Peachtree Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.9 ---- Autodesk Oregon Regional
1 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.9 ---- Traverse City District
2 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.8 ---- WPI Regional
3 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.2 ---- Utah Regional
2 ---- 2.6 ---- 6.3 ---- Israel Regional
1 ---- 3.8 ---- 5.7 ---- Washington DC Regional
1 ---- 4.2 ---- 5.3 ---- Bayou Regional

Mark McLeod 03-04-2010 19:45

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Week 5 field performance results including all previous weeks.
So you can brag about how good your field crews were.
Seattle's record was tied by the crew working the Minnesota North Star Regional, while across the street lagged by 30 seconds per match.

Michigan was a trial version of how Championship Divisions will be run with Quals beginning on Thursday afternoon.

# ------ total ----- Matches - Avg match
teams - matches - team ---- cycle -------- Event
48 ----- 80 --------- 10 --- 0:07:45 ---- Overall Averages


64 ------ 96 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:10 ---- Microsoft Seattle Regional
63 ------ 95 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:10 ---- Minnesota North Star Regional
35 ------ 70 --------- 12 ---- 0:06:28 ---- St. Louis Regional
44 ------ 66 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:29 ---- Philadelphia Regional
44 ------ 77 --------- 11 ---- 0:06:33 ---- Las Vegas Regional
50 ------ 84 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:44 ---- Silicon Valley Regional
58 ------ 97 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:47 ---- Los Angeles Regional
63 ------ 95 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:49 ---- Minnesota 10000 Lakes Regional
61 ------ 92 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:53 ---- Autodesk Oregon Regional
55 ------ 94 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:55 ---- Connecticut Regional
48 ------ 88 --------- 11 ---- 0:06:56 ---- SBPLI Long Island Regional
66 ------ 99 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:57 ---- Lone Star Regional
52 ------ 87 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:57 ---- Greater Toronto Regional
55 ------ 92 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:59 ---- Oklahoma Regional
53 ------ 78 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:03 ---- Dallas Regional
60 ------ 99 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:07 ---- Greater Kansas City Regional
40 ------ 80 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:09 ---- Troy District
50 ------ 82 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:11 ---- Peachtree Regional
53 ------ 80 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:13 ---- Boston Regional
50 ------ 92 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:13 ---- Chesapeake Regional
50 ------ 84 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:14 ---- Wisconsin Regional
44 ------ 66 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:21 ---- North Carolina Regional
41 ------ 82 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:22 ---- West Michigan District
28 ------ 56 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:22 ---- Hawaii Regional
60 ------ 90 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:26 ---- Buckeye Regional
63 ----- 130 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:30 ---- Michigan State Championship
61 ------ 92 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:33 ---- New Jersey Regional
39 ------ 72 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:34 ---- Boilermaker Regional
30 ------ 55 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:35 ---- Waterloo Regional
48 ------ 80 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:38 ---- BAE Granite State Regional
56 ------ 94 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:40 ---- Arizona Regional
44 ------ 74 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:41 ---- Finger Lakes Regional
42 ------ 70 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:46 ---- Midwest Regional
29 ------ 58 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:48 ---- WPI Regional
53 ------ 89 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:48 ---- Florida Regional
31 ------ 62 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:55 ---- Pittsburgh Regional
49 ------ 82 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:58 ---- San Diego Regional
59 ------ 89 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:59 ---- Washington DC Regional
40 ------ 80 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:00 ---- Ann Arbor District
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:06 ---- Sacramento Regional
34 ------ 63 --------- 11 ---- 0:08:42 ---- Palmetto Regional
41 ------ 62 ---------- 9 ---- 0:08:44 ---- Colorado Regional
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:49 ---- Detroit District
64 ------ 84 ---------- 8 ---- 0:09:02 ---- New York City Regional
38 ------ 60 ---------- 9 ---- 0:09:03 ---- Bayou Regional
33 ------ 55 --------- 10 ---- 0:09:03 ---- Utah Regional
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:09:09 ---- Traverse City District
40 ------ 72 --------- 11 ---- 0:09:36 ---- Cass Tech District
40 ------ 74 --------- 11 ---- 0:09:49 ---- Kettering District
63 ------ 82 ---------- 8 ---- 0:10:34 ---- Virginia Regional
55 ------ 27 ---------- 3 ---- 0:12:55 ---- Israel Regional

vhcook 04-04-2010 01:32

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Better late than never, here's my update including weeks 4 and 5:

Code:

Week—Event----------------------Session 0--Session 1--Session 2--Session 3--Overall
4---Seattle--------------------------------06:48.46---06:04.86---05:42.00---06:09.68
3---St. Louis Regional---------------------06:46.36---06:31.11---06:00.00---06:27.76
4---Philadelphia---------------------------06:38.82---06:06.43---06:53.33---06:28.57
5---Las Vegas------------------------------06:46.36---06:39.38---06:09.00---06:33.24
5---Minnesota North Star-------------------07:08.28---06:08.57---06:30.00---06:33.91
5---Minnesota 10k Lakes--------------------06:40.00---06:46.29---06:24.00---06:37.17
3---Silicon Valley Regional----------------06:57.27---06:34.55---06:43.85---06:43.70
4---Los Angeles----------------------------07:05.00---06:52.50---06:26.00---06:47.23
4---Connecticut----------------------------07:27.27---06:41.86---06:34.62---06:50.77
5---Lone Star------------------------------07:08.28---06:22.11---07:16.55---06:52.50
4---Long Island----------------------------07:32.50---06:08.82---07:22.22---06:55.76
1---Autodesk Oregon Regional---------------07:27.50---06:58.29---06:36.00---06:58.65
4---Oklahoma Regional----------------------07:47.14---06:56.47---06:13.33---06:59.33
3---Dallas Regional------------------------09:08.57---06:46.67---06:16.80---07:03.20
1---Greater Kansas City -------------------07:24.00---07:12.86---06:45.52---07:07.50
4---FIM Troy-------------------------------07:00.00---07:18.33---07:00.00---07:08.57
1---Peachtree Regional---------------------07:56.47---07:30.00---06:10.00---07:11.39
4---Boston---------------------------------07:48.00---07:00.00---07:02.61---07:13.25
2---Chesapeake Regional--------------------07:45.71---06:50.00---07:25.38---07:13.48
2---Wisconsin Regional---------------------08:22.86---06:51.67---06:47.50---07:14.07
4---North Carolina*------------------------07:33.00---07:16.80---07:14.12---07:21.29
3---FIM Western Michigan-------------------07:00.00---07:41.43---07:00.00---07:22.03
5---Greater Toronto------------------------07:16.00---07:53.57---06:55.38---07:22.14
2---Arizona Regional-----------------------10:06.32---07:36.00---05:45.00---07:28.35
5---FIM Michigan State Champs---08:22.76---06:47.59---06:53.68---08:06.00---07:30.00
4---Buckeye--------------------------------09:42.50---07:00.00---06:23.64---07:31.03
3---Boilermaker Regional-------------------07:24.00---07:30.00---07:50.53---07:33.91
4---Waterloo-------------------------------07:14.12---07:20.00---08:21.43---07:34.62
1---BAE Systems Granite State--------------08:51.43---07:05.63---07:17.50---07:38.18
1---New Jersey Regional--------------------10:00.00---07:20.00---07:01.71---07:38.18
1---Finger Lakes Regional------------------07:27.00---08:33.10---06:46.36---07:41.41
3---Midwest Regional-----------------------10:10.59---07:01.82---06:45.88---07:45.67
1---Washington DC Regional-----------------10:03.75---07:38.05---06:45.52---07:47.44
2---Florida Regional-----------------------09:06.32---06:38.05---08:41.54---07:48.14
2---WPI Regional---------------------------07:36.67---08:02.86---07:48.75---07:50.18
4---Hawaii---------------------------------09:04.29---07:36.52---07:18.75---07:54.34
2---Pittsburgh Regional--------------------09:30.00---07:35.56---07:53.08---07:54.92
2---San Diego Regional --------------------09:40.00---07:24.32---07:32.50---07:57.72
5---Sacramento-----------------------------07:54.78---08:12.41---08:54.29---08:18.90
2---FIM Ann Arbor--------------------------10:21.82---08:04.62---08:11.11---08:26.49
4---Palmetto-------------------------------08:03.75---08:06.67---10:14.12---08:42.00
3---Virginia Regional----------------------07:24.00---08:57.50---08:47.27---08:43.52
4---Colorado-------------------------------09:35.29---08:25.38---08:18.75---08:43.73
3---FIM Detroit----------------------------08:55.71---08:15.88---09:31.20---08:49.32
2---New York City Regional-----------------10:28.42---08:50.63---08:20.00---09:02.22
1---Bayou Regional-------------------------10:55.71---08:27.86---08:26.25---09:03.10
3---Utah Regional--------------------------10:52.00---08:18.26---08:21.43---09:03.46
1---FIM Traverse City----------------------10:25.00---09:37.50---08:06.21---09:09.04
2---FIM Cass Tech--------------------------10:33.33---09:43.64---09:06.67---09:35.65
1---FIM Kettering University---------------13:30.00---09:34.55---09:22.50---09:49.01
2---Israel Regional------------------------21:24.00---15:00.00--------------17:22.22

X---Overall---------------------08:22.76---08:40.71---07:36.61---07:23.38---07:50.14

X---Overall (except Israel)----------------08:25.44---07:27.74---07:23.38---07:38.70



To keep the naming conventions consistent, I've dubbed the Thursday afternoon session at the Michigan State Championships as Session 0.

There was an anomaly in the North Carolina data in which match 23 shows a start time two hours after the last other match concluded Friday. I've given them the benefit of the doubt and discounted it from the averages, but I'm very curious as to the story there.

On the whole, the week 4 and 5 regionals put on a very strong performance, in terms of turnaround time. Troy District turned in another precision performance with every reset at 7 or 8 minutes. Seattle broke Arizona's half-day record by 3 seconds per match on Saturday morning, those regionals being the only two to maintain an average below 6 minutes for an entire session.

Thanks to all the queuing and field crews across the country who have done their best to keep things moving. Good luck Atlanta volunteers!

EricH 04-04-2010 02:50

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vhcook (Post 947682)
There was an anomaly in the North Carolina data in which match 23 shows a start time two hours after the last other match concluded Friday. I've given them the benefit of the doubt and discounted it from the averages, but I'm very curious as to the story there.

I'd guess that it was a replay, caused by a field fault, and run at the very end of the day on Friday to keep everything else on schedule. Good idea to not count it.

Mark McLeod 21-04-2010 12:23

2010 Championship Field Stats
 
All Championship fields had:
  • 86 teams
  • 144 total matches
  • 10 matches per team
Don't know what the target match turn-around times were, so can't say how close to the target each of the fields was.

------------ Avg match ---- Avg Qual ---- Avg Elim
Field --------- cycle --------- Score ------ Score

Archimedes - 0:06:24.9 -------- 15.6 -------- 25.8
Curie -------- 0:06:16.4 -------- 14.6 -------- 24.1
Galileo ------ 0:06:12.0 -------- 13.8 -------- 22.8
Newton ----- 0:06:00.0 -------- 13.0 -------- 25.9

Einstein ----- 0:18:40.0--------- n/a -------- 29.3


The average elimination score for all fields is on a par with the Michigan State event, so it seems this represents the optimum scores that can be expected from Breakaway! after teams have gained experience at a couple of regional/district events.

ATannahill 21-04-2010 20:24

Re: 2010 Championship Field Stats
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 956389)
------------ Avg match ---- Avg Qual ---- Avg Elim
Field --------- cycle --------- Score ------ Score

Newton -- 1-2 presentations----- n/a -------- 29.3

I think you spelled Einstein wrong.

Mark McLeod 21-04-2010 21:15

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Thanks

vhcook 23-04-2010 14:00

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
Per session cycle times for Championships, where 0 is Thursday night, 1 is Friday morning, and so on:

Code:

Session......0........1........2........3
Archimedes...0:06:21..0:06:13..0:06:18..0:06:35
Curie........0:06:28..0:05:46..0:06:20..0:06:06
Galileo......0:06:08..0:06:00..0:06:06..0:06:22
Newton.......0:05:58..0:05:39..0:06:04..0:06:02

I took a look at the match schedule on Thursday before most had run, and it appeared they were targeting 6 minute turnaround.

Mark McLeod 03-06-2010 11:01

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
One last note...
I related this year's event match turnaround and scores with previous year's.
A jump in #matches offered to teams while the # teams per event has stayed fairly constant. Championship match cycles are understandably lower, since everyone (drive teams, field staff) have experience in the new yearly game. Einstein scores are typically much higher than those seen at early events.

Scores are per Alliance.

Code:

Regional/District Averages
                          2008              2009            2010
Teams per event            46                49              48
Total matches              71                71              80
Matches per team            9                  9              10
Avg. Match turnaround    6:40              7:21            7:45
Avg. Qualifying score    36.1              52.4              3.1
Avg. Elimination score    48.6              52.8              5.6
 
 
Championship Averages
                          2008              2009            2010
Teams per Division          85                87              86
Total matches              100                102              144
Matches per team            7                  7              10
Avg. Match turnaround    5:58              6:13            6:13
Avg. Qualifying score    67.3              71.4              7.1
Avg. Einstein score      101.6              72.4            14.6


Jared Russell 03-06-2010 11:22

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
It looks like you used the average single-alliance score for all data points but Einstein in 2010, where it looks like you used the sum of both alliances.

Mark McLeod 03-06-2010 11:29

Re: 2010 Regional Stats
 
It looks like I forgot to divide all the scores by 2 for 2010. I'll go through them and fix those in a minute.

Thanks.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi