![]() |
1114 vs. 469
Who do you think is a better robot and team? and why?
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
1114 is a scoring monster and one on one vs 469, 1114 will win every time. 469 is an alliance bot. The better their alliance players are, the better they are. In the qualification rounds where alliances are random ... I'd probably take 1114. In the elims where 469 will have a good scorer to assist, I'll take 469. |
Re: 1114 vs. 469
In my opinion, 1114 is the best "traditional" breakaway robot out there. They score with the best of them (from any zone), they are fast, they can push, they have great drivers (as always it seems), and they are one of the fastest hangers I know of. Their robot is surely as well engineered as any robot out there. However, I'm a HUGE fan of creativity. While I do not doubt that 1114 was creative in finding ways to play the game as best as they can, 469's strategy (and execution) is amazing.
One-on-one, 1114 would take 469 almost every time. But in the elimination matches, if 469 has an offensive powerhouse on its alliance (and I don't see how it wouldn't), 1114 would be hard pressed to score fast enough to be competitive. |
Re: 1114 vs. 469
i would not mind either one on my alliance. In the qualifications i would take 1114 just because of there ability to score and hang consecutively. And i would have to say i would take them over 469 in the finals. Even though 469 will be with a good alliance almost as they have been with 217 twice and won both i think 1114 would still have a great alliance and be able to hang and score well to beat 469
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
As Dan said, they're different strategies. 469 with a scorer will dominate...
Put 'em together we're all screwed... (Hint for Atlanta) |
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
I saw some strategies last weekend that were effective at keeping 469 out of the tunnel. Granted, they can still kick from the middle, but I don't think they would be able to keep up with a team like 1114 mid-fielding. 1114 would have to play 3v2 to keep 469 out of the tunnel... but my money is on them.
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
Only if they end up in the same division. Problem I see, is that the likelihood of 469 ending up in a division without one of 148, 217, 1114, 2056, etc. is basically zero. |
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
It will be interesting to see how the MSC plays out. 469 hasn't played at an event with 67 yet. |
Re: 1114 vs. 469
It saddens me that there is so much focus on us this year. It detracts from other teams that put just as much, or more effort into their robot than we did. They may have taken a more traditional approach, but these teams are all still innovative and creative with their robots. 33, 67, 148, & 217, just to name a few, should all be commended for having great robots, each as different as night and day. (Except 148 & 217, but that is beside the point. ) Even newer teams with only a couple years under their belts are doing well. 2612 seeded at both of their events and made it to the finals at Cass Tech. They have an amazing robot this year also.
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Quote:
|
Re: 1114 vs. 469
Maybe he was referring to 341, who has won two regionals and appear to have a similar two roller ball magnet.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi