Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

If a designer knows and understands the limits of a welded 6061 frame, this is not a downside. We've been running welded 6061 frames for years, and the one broken weld we had was just horrible, awful, horrible design. Please stop saying how awful welded 6061 is every chance you get. There are a lot of advantages to teams only having to stock primarily one type of aluminum (we still stock a lot fo 2024, 7068 and 7075 for shafts however).

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

48 lbs seems a touch on the heavy side. Is the battery included?

Instead of using tube stock for your outside frame, can you replace them with bolted on sheet metal?

What we do is two pieces of nylon bolted through a spacing tube, and to tighten them we just tighten the bolts down, to loosen we loosen them.

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

Clearly welded 6061 can be used with great results, many teams (like yours) have. I am merely suggesting that there could be a more optimal design. There are very few deviations from bolted aluminum chassis, welded aluminum chassis, and folded sheet aluminum chassis. I am just trying to encourage students and mentors to re-evaluate how they make their robots. Of course there are other factors like material cost and availability, and those do matter.

I have a suspicion that many teams just "make the chassis like we always do" without ever trying to optimize it or even try something different (if only on paper as a theoretical exercise). A CAD model is great for that, the model could made with different configurations: one with aluminum tubing, one with steel tubing. Pick a few load cases that you know the aluminum one will pass, then optimize the steel one until you have the same factor of safety and see what the weights are. It'd be a reasonably in-depth undertaking, but excellent practice for anyone who wanted to do it. I know SolidWorks has multi-configuration support, and some of the simulation packages even have built-in optimization function that are very easy to use. In the past SolidWorks has donated free copies to FIRST teams.

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

The 80/20 quickframe is fairly rigid when you tie everything together. out of the 3 years we've used quickframe we've never had a failed corner connector or had our frame come apart. The biggest selling point for us is being able to build a robot frame extremely quickly. Price wise the quickframe can be found for about $10 for 8' and corner connectors are like $2.60 a piece. Price can vary depending on your local 80/20 dealer we tend to get our stuff from the 80/20 garage sale ebay store because of availability.

Good luck with your prototype!

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

There will always be a more optimal design. In fact, most people using aluminum tend to overbuild their chassis's as well.

I think you would have a hard time selling a change from aluminum to steel to many teams, not to mention quite a few air-frame firms and racecar teams.

Aluminum has a couple benefits that aren't immediately apparent.

#1 Cutting aluminum by hand, generally speaking, is far easier than steel
#2 Drilling is usually much easier
#3 Aluminum is usually used in wall thinknesses that support tapping directly without the use of additional hardware
#4 Because aluminum is generally large in size, it's that much easier to cheesehole and to make up for mis-located/designed components because you have extra leeway.

Our team learned to weld aluminum in a week, then taught the students how to do so as well. It really wasn't that bad.

That said, we built our frames out of 80-20 the first year, thin-wall steel the next two years, and aluminum the last 2. I wouldn't say any were heads-above the others. They all had their own strengths and weaknesses.

Back to the frame (I hate to make an off-topic post that isn't at least a bit on-topic), frankly I think you've overbuilt it a bit. I think you can remove a lot of your cross members and retain your rigidity and strength. Think about mounting your transmissions by their base (on a flat plate). This will remove the need for upper-long-ways beams internally, and you can move your cross-supports down onto the bottom portion of the frame.

Neat Design!

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

Funny you should mention those two industries in particular...

I learned to weld 4130 steel when I started welding for a race car team (Formula SAE) in which a vast majority of race-car frames are welded steel, the remainder are generally carbon fiber monocoque frames. In my 4 years of involvement with FSAE I never saw a race car with a welded aluminum frame. NASCAR is all welded tube steel chassis by regulation. The aluminum car chassis I have seen are not welded, like the Lotus Elise chassis is folded aluminum that is riveted and glued together. The only race vehicle that I've seen a welded aluminum chassis is a japanese sport bike, though top-end race bikes, like Ducatis, use welded steel frames.

A vast majority of small airframes and helicopter frames are welded 4130. I should know, I do welding repairs for a local helicopter shop when the mechanics need something difficult or exotic repaired. I am also in touch with a local business that plans on producing single-engine air planes, and the entire airframe is welded 4130 steel.

I completely agree with your list of aluminum benefits. Though I would add that cutting off and re-welding brackets/mounts/etc on a steel frame is not too difficult either, and I've done that PLENTY of times. One can also weld bolts (uncoated ones) directly to a steel frame, often negating the need to drill holes in the frame.

Re: pic: Prototype Drivetrain
 

As a team that uses a non-standard material for the majority of our robot (wood) I particularly like the steel tube suggestion. It is much stronger than an aluminum frame as well as possibly easier to find and easier to weld. I am all for teams really investigating the best materials for the job instead of just going with what they have done in the past