Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   IRI OPR Ranking (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86359)

Ed Law 19-07-2010 09:46

IRI OPR Ranking
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here are the OPR numbers for IRI. There is no surprise. Some very high numbers. Amazing matches. Wish we were there.

ISITME_YESITIS 19-07-2010 14:30

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
You are missing the elimination matches. :ahh:

Chris is me 19-07-2010 14:36

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Only at IRI is the normal robot with the highest OPR... a backup bot! :eek:

Ed Law 20-07-2010 01:08

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ISITME_YESITIS (Post 969428)
You are missing the elimination matches. :ahh:

Sorry I did not include them earlier. Elimination matches are not used to calculate OPR numbers. These have to be done manually and I did not have time to do it at work.

Here is an updated speadsheet with elimination results. Most selections alligned with their OPR scores. There were 4 teams that had relatively high OPR but did not get picked: 107, 1038, 141 and 461.

dodar 20-07-2010 01:21

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
1732 did get picked

Ed Law 20-07-2010 01:34

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 969519)
1732 did get picked

Thanks. Corrected. It is late and I was half asleep.

vance 20-07-2010 13:08

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
I can't help but wonder what the least amount of wins an alliance captain at IRI has had.

Zach O 20-07-2010 14:09

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vance (Post 969560)
I can't help but wonder what the least amount of wins an alliance captain at IRI has had.

Team 1058, the 8th seed alliance captain, had the least amount of wins. Their record was (3-1-4)

Basel A 20-07-2010 14:21

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zach O (Post 969567)
Team 1058, the 8th seed alliance captain, had the least amount of wins. Their record was (3-1-4)

I believe he meant ever, but I could be wrong.

vance 20-07-2010 14:30

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 969569)
I believe he meant ever, but I could be wrong.

Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

BrendanB 20-07-2010 14:34

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vance (Post 969570)
Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

I think that their record is the least number of wins since previous years it was based on wins and losses, not points, but I may be wrong from 2003 and back (a little fuzzy on the rules).

Collin Fultz 20-07-2010 15:47

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
I think technically the answer would be whomever was #1 seed alliance captain in 2001, since that game was 4-0 and there weren't "winners" during qualification matches. They would have had 0 wins.

Zach O 20-07-2010 16:24

Re: IRI OPR Ranking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vance (Post 969570)
Indeed ever. Of course I know our record was 3-1-4. I suppose number of losses is a better indicator of success.

Sorry, I thought your question was IRI specific. I thought the answer was rather easy... :P


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi