Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Fantasy FIRST (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86438)

Chris is me 07-01-2011 15:36

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Alamo 1: 1477 for 2843
CT: 2836 for 237

in order of course

Basel A 07-01-2011 15:52

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 992462)
Updated.

1749 dropped BAE.
3612 dropped Alamo.
568 dropped San Diego.
3850 dropped Florida.
2673 dropped Detroit.
2817 dropped Wisconsin.
78 dropped Connecticut.

Per 78, can we just pretend I never submitted a waiver request, and give me back 2836? Or is that not really the way things go?

If not, then
Connecticut: 2836 for 78

Chris is me 07-01-2011 15:54

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
I would be fine with that (read: you can ignore my request for the team if you do that)

ATannahill 07-01-2011 15:59

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
I have an idea I would like to submit. In the case of San Diego and Conneticut, where someone is missing a team and there are teams on wire.

The person missing a team can pull from the pile. Otherwise they can grab a team off of waiver but go to the bottom of the waiver list.

Basel A 07-01-2011 17:18

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 992493)
I have an idea I would like to submit. In the case of San Diego and Conneticut, where someone is missing a team and there are teams on wire.

The person missing a team can pull from the pile. Otherwise they can grab a team off of waiver but go to the bottom of the waiver list.

Not sure if this is the same thing, but why not make it a regular waiver pick, but give priority to players trading away a team that dropped. if it's the same, I could definitely see that as the most reasonable solution.

EricH 07-01-2011 23:59

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 992526)
Not sure if this is the same thing, but why not make it a regular waiver pick, but give priority to players trading away a team that dropped. if it's the same, I could definitely see that as the most reasonable solution.

That's the way originally suggested--players missing teams go higher on the list in those tiers.

EricH 08-01-2011 02:52

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Awright, here's the scoop.

Ed is missing 2673 in Detroit.
Basel already noticed 78's absence.
dodar should notice 568's absence from San Diego shortly.

Other than those three and Barry (548, West MI 2), nobody's missing any teams to my knowledge.

They can grab any available team, waiver or no, in that tier. Should that team be on the waiver list, they go to the bottom of the list; otherwise, the list doesn't change. The missing team takes precedence over any waiver claims submitted. Is that fair enough for everyone?

Note: If no claim is made by someone missing a team before waivers are processed, then all waiver claims are valid and will be processed accordingly.

ATannahill 08-01-2011 08:00

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 992486)
Per 78, can we just pretend I never submitted a waiver request, and give me back 2836? Or is that not really the way things go?

If not, then
Connecticut: 2836 for 78

You get 2836 in CT and go to bottom of the waiver list.

ATannahill 08-01-2011 08:02

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
1. Karibou
2. Bethany Mc.
3. Tim Delles
4. dodar
5. Koko Ed
6. Barry Bonzack
7. Josh Fox
8. EricH
9. Vikesrock
10. Chris is me
11. rtfgnow
12. Basel A

ATannahill 10-01-2011 09:31

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
1. Karibou
2. Bethany Mc.
3. Tim Delles
4. dodar
5. Koko Ed
6. Barry Bonzack
7. Josh Fox
8. Vikesrock
9. Chris is me
10. Basel A
11. rtfgnow
12. EricH

EricH
1477 for 457 in Alamo 1
522 for 1672 in New Jersey

rtfgnow
2415 for 1539 in North Carolina

ATannahill 14-01-2011 20:34

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
waivers for 1/16

Alamo 1: 118 457
Alamo 2: 118
Waterford 1: 862 2673
Waterford 2: 862 2673
New Jersey: 1672
North Carolina: 1539
Kansas City: 476
St. Louis 1: 2014
St. Louis 2: 2014
Detroit: 2832
West Michigan: 2245

3123 dropped New Jersey
3631 dropped Alamo
3873 dropped Florida
2834 dropped Waterford
3076 dropped Israel
2038 dropped Peachtree
862 dropped West Michigan

I got up to the Seattle events before the FIRST page broke down on me. I will try again later.

ATannahill 14-01-2011 22:38

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
More 1/16 waivers.

Washington: 1086
Oregon: 2517
10,000 Lakes: 3883
Troy: 322
Colorado: 499

108 dropped Palmetto.
2245 dropped Niles.
293 dropped Connecticut.
852 dropped Oregon.
3541, 3543, 3590, and 3683 all dropped Toronto East.
1514, 2670 and 3563 dropped Toronto West.
322 dropped Livonia.
225 dropped Philadelphia.

Chris is me 14-01-2011 23:01

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
DC: 1086 for 2914 top priority

Vikesrock 15-01-2011 11:16

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtfgnow (Post 1000376)
More 1/16 waivers.

10,000 Lakes: 388

I think this should be 3883.

ATannahill 15-01-2011 16:48

Re: [FF]: Season Long Waiver Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vikesrock (Post 1000643)
I think this should be 3883.

Corrected.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:37.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi