![]() |
Regional Selection Process
With Bill Miller unveiling the tentative regional schedule, it got me thinking about which events 148 will attend this season. That got me thinking about what exactly makes us choose the regionals we do and I began to analyze our criteria for regional selection... which of course made me wonder, what do other teams do?
How does your team select which regionals you attend? Do you have a specific set of criteria? Some of 148's criteria:
http://jvengineering.blogspot.com/20...l-choices.html |
Re: Regional Selection Process
I was about to post on your blog that you should post this on chief because it was good advice... Clearly way ahead of me.
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
Quote:
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
Quote:
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
We like week 1 regionals - it's a more level playing field, where nobody has one or more regionals under their belt.
We dislike week 1 regionals - the glitches try our patience, and sometimes we get more character-building than we prefer. Our criteria are similar: Trenton is (was?) our "home" regional (and plenty of big dogs there), we want to go somewhere interesting, but not too far (airfares are expensive), Never-ever a back-to-back (more a schoolwork thing) and the kids need to remain relatively safe. |
Re: Regional Selection Process
ooh... didn't read the blog first... oops :o
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
Team 79 usually goes to the Florida Regional and another regional over our spring break. This way students don't miss as much school.
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
I for one am sick of week 1 regionals. We always felt we did better at our "home" regional if we did an away regional before hand. Since our home regional is almost always week 3, this means we do a week 1. We have done 5 years of this and each year, the week 1 regional seems to get more and more frustrating and less productive - character building as John would say. This might be a year we try some change and go for a "home" regional first and "away" second.
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
I only competed at Week 1 regionals, but I really liked them. I agree there was occasionally "character building*", but I think its much easier to build a great Week 1 bot than a great Week 5 robot. The feel I've gotten over the past 7 (eep, I'm old!) years, is that if you can reliably score the game pieces you start with in week 1, you'll be playing on Saturday afternoon. Later on in the season, as everyone gets tuned up, you really need to be able to make a 2nd and 3rd trip to the goal. (Obviously, winning isn't everything, but it is more fun to be in the hunt!)
*To be fair though, outside of 2009's static issues, I can't remember any of the other field delays. |
Re: Regional Selection Process
1. The school board only allows us to take township buses within the state border.
2. Charter bus is expensive. 3. We don't have loads of money 4. Boilermaker Regional is the only regional in the state. ---- 5. BMR FTW! |
Re: Regional Selection Process
Darn.... I thought maybe we would get to see you on the east coast :)
We are just starting the debate now as well. we know for a large part this year we will probably not consider a regional that is not within driving range. Similar to you, NJ is home regional for us, its 5 miles from our warehouse and it would be unfair not to attend. I would like to see NJ back at its Week 3 status but that is never going to happen again, I have come to accept that. Lets see where we go to this year, I dont think we are gonna make it to Dallas again though :).. we had such a great time at the regional also, except for the snow in Dallas in March!! |
Re: Regional Selection Process
Gotta do the "Home" event (West MI - week 3) and try to avoid consecutive weekends. We prefer to have one event under our belt before our home event, which pushes us to a week 1 event.
I used to prefer to sit out Week 1 so we could see how the game played out & plan our hardware improvements before we had to compete. However, since the MI district format guarantees us at least 2 events, I have developed a fondness for week 1. Every team designs and builds their robots in an experience vacuum. The initial hardware and strategy is based entirely on their own imagination and planning. Nobody knows how things will work out, and everyone is in the same boat. This "newness" is soon lost as the game develops. Continuous improvement is great aspect of FRC, but it is cool to be there at the beginning. |
Re: Regional Selection Process
Good list John. Our criteria are similar (DC is our 'home'), with two more notable questions for the 2nd Regional:
In the past one of the sponsors has requested a specific regional because it then allowed us to give that company's site (local to the regional) a demonstration of FIRST and our program. Additionally, traveling to other regionals further away from us has allowed us to get out of our own locally-based paradigms of funding, design processes (i.e. software development cycles), and general style. To this day the Cheesy Poofs and Pink would be simple team numbers on CD, except we went to Las Vegas in 2007 and Florida in 2009. It also allowed us to meet up with Exploding Bacon in Florida to get to know the advantages/challenges to an NPO-based team over many days in person rather than via email. Philadelphia ('08) is laden with teams who are just as great off the field as they are on the field, and the matches were very exciting for Drexel having such a 'small' venue. |
Re: Regional Selection Process
Quote:
|
Re: Regional Selection Process
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi