![]() |
pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
(For those interested, there's a few more pictures at the end of this album, and I can also upload the plans of the vertical suspenders themselves)
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
When did you guys actually put the vertical hangers on?
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
We put them on Wednesday night, but when we found out that our schedule didn't have 33, you guys (27), or 1718 in it, we took them off until after the event, when this took place.
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Forget the staged part; this is quite impressive. Good job!
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Staged or not, that is quite awesome.
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Those side hanger attachments look very, very bent. Did the mechanism take the loads well? Would it have worked repeatedly?
|
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Quote:
The one on the right, however, is. That happened when 1718 suspended. I suspect is was because their mechanism was a bit too tall, but it could have just been a moment-exertion issue. I will note that while it bent, it did not break. Even after 1718 was removed, 27 suspended successfully without any further bending. Would it have worked repeatedly? I am inclined to say yes, but really I'm not sure. As I said, there was another suspension without further bending. That specific bend may have been a "freak" incident or just a result of 1718's mechanism. I do believe it would have worked multiple times in usage with 27, 33, and most other "strongman" vertically hanging robots. It was never tested with "driving up" 'bots such as 2056. |
Re: pic: Staged Double Vertical Suspension
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi