Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Best Robot of 2010 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87004)

Mike Marandola 30-09-2010 10:04

Best Robot of 2010
 
What is your opinion on the best team of the 2010 FRC competition season?
Personally I think the two best robots were 229 and 217.

Jack Jones 30-09-2010 10:23

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Define best!?

Taylor 30-09-2010 10:46

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Best robot or best team?

Best robot, hands-down, is 469. No argument, no discrepancies, no doubt.

Best team? Mine. :p

Alan Anderson 30-09-2010 10:52

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by marandola316 (Post 975578)
What is your opinion on the best team of the 2010 FRC competition season?
Personally I think the two best robots were 229 and 217.

FIRST presents the Chairman's Award to the team they think is best, and the best robot tends to win matches and earn trophies. The best team might not have the best robot. What are you really asking?

Andrew Schreiber 30-09-2010 10:58

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Any robot that inspired more than a single student to pursue their passion was the best robot.

IKE 30-09-2010 11:11

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
My vote would have to go to one of the underwater team that enabled the capping of the oil well. This is a pretty big deal as my year after year favorites have been on Mars for quite some time.

Chris is me 30-09-2010 11:28

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
There is no argument for any team that is not 469. No team has ever had such a dramatic effect on the game this year than them. If you've ever seen 469 compete, especially at MSC, Curie, or IRI, you really just can't dispute it...

If you put any redirection bot aside, though, you can have a fun argument and discussion on the relative merits of great "overall" teams like 67, 33, 1718, 1519, 294, and 1625, but I feel 1114 was a cut above the rest in all aspects of the game.

If you break it down by zone and role it gets more interesting. Some robots were pretty good overall but GREAT in the front. 359, 910, and 971 are the immediate first choices there. The backbot was a role I felt that teams that really excelled at had the most competitive success this year, as it was a role a lot of teams were willing to give up or throw their second pick at but was a lot more important than many alliances thought at selection time. 294 is the superstar here, plus 3138, 217 / 148, and 33.

Lil' Lavery 30-09-2010 12:21

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
There's still two months left in 2010. Isn't this discussion a little premature?

Taylor 30-09-2010 12:24

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 975604)
There's still two months left in 2010. Isn't this discussion a little premature?

The apple doesn't fall far ...

Chris is me 30-09-2010 13:10

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 975604)
There's still two months left in 2010. Isn't this discussion a little premature?

To take your witticism seriously for a minute, I would say not.

Let's take the main contenders for the prize: 1114, 469, 67, 33, 1718, 1519, 294, and 1625 in my opinion as outlined below. Michigan is done with offseasons basically right now, so you can cut those teams out which leaves 294, 1519, and 1625. 294's traditional offseason participation is over, and 1114 and 1625 don't have offseasons in their region. That leaves 1519, whom might go to Bash at the Beach or one of the other late NE offseasons, but while they're great, I doubt they will suddenly grow above and beyond the other "contenders" here.

dodar 30-09-2010 13:14

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
I cant believe no one has thrown 2056's hat into the ring yet?

Basel A 30-09-2010 15:51

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 975622)
To take your witticism seriously for a minute, I would say not.

Let's take the main contenders for the prize: 1114, 469, 67, 33, 1718, 1519, 294, and 1625 in my opinion as outlined below. Michigan is done with offseasons basically right now, so you can cut those teams out which leaves 294, 1519, and 1625. 294's traditional offseason participation is over, and 1114 and 1625 don't have offseasons in their region. That leaves 1519, whom might go to Bash at the Beach or one of the other late NE offseasons, but while they're great, I doubt they will suddenly grow above and beyond the other "contenders" here.

WMRI? Michigan isn't quite done yet.

AdamHeard 30-09-2010 15:53

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Surprised no one has mentioned 254 and 233 yet. 254 handily won two regionals, was #1 seed in their division, and 233 was their pick (in a stacked division).

dodar 30-09-2010 15:58

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
I wouldnt say 233 as a best robot contender for the year. 254 yes. 233 no. Now, From thinking of teams that also made it to Einstein, I would mention that rookie team that made it. I believe they were The Comets, but idr the team ####

Jon Jack 30-09-2010 16:04

Re: Best Robot of 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 975651)
Surprised no one has mentioned 254 and 233 yet. 254 handily won two regionals, was #1 seed in their division, and 233 was their pick (in a stacked division).

I agree that 254 should certainly be in the conversation for best robot of the year.

However, I don't think 233 fits in the category. 233 had a rough start to the season (missed elims in Florida and semis in LA). As usual, 233 were masters of continuous improvement and were much better at championships than they were in Florida or LA.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi