![]() |
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
Back on topic: Can you show a breakdown of how many teams are going to 1 or 2 events and the Championship? ie 1 only, 1 and Championship, 2 only, 2 and Champs, Champs only (can you do that?) I understand that the numbers may be off since there is a waitlist for events. |
Re: Registration 2011
26% of teams are signed up for extra Regionals (including 6 MI teams)
Only 47% of Michigan teams are listed for their 2nd District event yet. 9% are signed up for Championships (in the end that will be ~18%) Counting Regional/District/Championship events:
In case you were looking for these specifics derived from the above #'s:
Went back and looked only at teams that are not signed up for Championships:
|
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
(http://engineering.unlv.edu/first/ |
Re: Registration 2011
Events proceed...
Philadelphia and Smoky Mountain both filled to initial capacity over the weekend. 9 more Regionals are within 1-5 spots of reaching initial capacity:
BAE, San Diego, WPI, Pittsburgh, NYC, Sacramento, Boilermaker, Oklahoma, Los Angeles, Midwest, LI, Silicon Valley, Connecticut, Smoky Mountain, Colorado, Boston, Virginia, Philadelphia. 6 Regionals went into stealth mode before the 2nd event registration opening:
P.S. 10 Regionals have gone beyond initial capacity numbers by adding rookies to the team list, so some of the reserved slots are already partially showing in spots. P.P.S. # registered teams passed the number that played in 2009 (1677) around 4:30pm. Unrestricted registration opens Thursday, so we should see more multiples then, but it'll all be blocked from us by wait lists if Regional Directors don't begin clearing them soon. I wonder how much the wait lists discourage subsequent registrations? |
Re: Registration 2011
What do you mean by stealth mode? Like the regional directors arent allowing anyone to register for it?
|
Re: Registration 2011
Stealth mode are events that didn't reach their initial advertised capacity, but reset their open slots to zero, so anyone registering for it would immediately go on the wait list.
There's just no way to see what's going on and when it reached, if it ever did, initial capacity. Regional Directors do this to give themselves more latitude in assigning limited availability slots. The Texas Regionals are a good example. They were all frozen below capacity, so preferential treatment can be given the Texas teams. They have a State funding restriction that says the teams must play in-state or not receive the funding. Washington State has a similar State funding restriction, but they handled it up front by freezing the team list right from the start, then they opened it up when they knew all the State teams could be covered. |
Re: Registration 2011
Oh ok that makes sense. Florida did reach advertised capacity, atleast last time I checked. Reached 51 teams middle of last week.
|
Re: Registration 2011
1 Attachment(s)
Florida original capacity was 54 teams and was at 50 last week before 2nd event registration opened. At that time it was frozen at 50 teams. For "initial capacity" I use the numbers as they were when registration first opened, not later manipulations of those numbers.
Around 12:30 today it went to 52 teams as two more rookies were added. I attached the Florida registration plot. P.S. The Florida Regional has 12 rookie teams, so I can see why they might have cut short the open slots. That's a lot of growth. |
Re: Registration 2011
Finger Lakes and Arizona Regionals have now reached initial capacity.
The running for the event with the most rookies (where the vets need to work their hardest):
Toronto East & West combined have (14) rookies Here's everyone with rookies as of Halloween: FL -------------- 12 SDC ------------ 10 Alamo ---------- 10 Tor-E ------------ 8 SAC ------------- 7 MI-West --------- 7 MA -------------- 7 OK -------------- 6 OH -------------- 6 MI-Traverse ----- 6 MI-Kettering ---- 6 Bayou ----------- 6 GA -------------- 6 CT -------------- 6 Tor-W ----------- 6 MI-Troy --------- 5 MI-Niles -------- 5 MI-Ann Arbor --- 5 Cascade --------- 4 SC -------------- 4 PIT ------------- 4 NC -------------- 4 MI-Livonia ------ 4 Dallas ---------- 4 AZ -------------- 4 10k ------------- 4 UT -------------- 3 Lone Star ------ 3 Silicon Valley -- 3 NJ -------------- 3 MI-Detroit ------ 3 LI -------------- 3 IN -------------- 3 IL -------------- 3 DC -------------- 3 CO -------------- 3 BAE ------------- 3 WI -------------- 2 Olympic -------- 2 TN -------------- 2 PA -------------- 2 OR -------------- 2 N. Star --------- 2 KC -------------- 2 Los Angeles ---- 2 WPI ------------- 1 VA -------------- 1 NYC ------------- 1 MO -------------- 1 FLR ------------- 1 MD -------------- 1 |
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
Thanks for all your hard work in getting this data! Steve |
Re: Registration 2011
Thanks for the correction.
The numbers I posted were mostly as of this past weekend and only the top returns were updated this afternoon as the question occurred to me. |
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
Steve |
Re: Registration 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2011
Why didn't you register for Alamo when your rookie teams did to be sure you all went to the same place?
Have you contacted the Alamo Regional Director and explained the situation linking you to the other Arkansas rookies? Alamo has a lot of space, so it may not become a problem. You have quite a mentoring challenge with the rookies so widespread. --------------- The number of teams passed the 1700 mark at around 6am EST, this morning. That's about 10 days ahead of last year. Growth has gained a little since the day 2nd event registration opened. It's reached 8% ahead of this time last year. That's about the same % gap that 2010 registratration held over 2009 registration numbers at this time. Chesapeake and Oregon have reached initial capacity now. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi