Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Universal Robotic Gripper (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87285)

JohnBoucher 27-10-2010 12:01

Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Coffee grounds in a balloon drawing a vacuum

University of Chicago, Cornell researchers develop universal robotic gripper

JesseK 27-10-2010 12:37

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
:ahh:

That just may trump the roller claw.

Jon236 27-10-2010 13:29

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
very nice.......probably coarse grind......expresso grind tends to stick

Chris is me 27-10-2010 13:34

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Seems like an adaptation of the suction cup to better distribute vacuum force over objects with uneven surfaces. I want to play with it, and see how much better it holds various objects compared to suction cups. I wonder how feasible this is in FRC.

This is so cool!

EricVanWyk 27-10-2010 14:15

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Sweet!

Reminds me of the jammer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbqHERKdlK8

jspatz1 27-10-2010 21:13

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 978618)
Seems like an adaptation of the suction cup to better distribute vacuum force over objects with uneven surfaces. I want to play with it, and see how much better it holds various objects compared to suction cups. I wonder how feasible this is in FRC.

I don't believe it is applying suction to the object in the traditional sense as with a suction cup. That would imply that the balloon material is porous, and that would leak vacuum all over. If I correctly interpret what is happening, the vacuum inside the balloon is causing the balloon material to constrict around the object, with the resulting friction causing it to "grip." Notice all objects are 3D, not flat, and that they force the balloon around the object before gripping it. Great example of an totally new idea.

Andrew Bates 27-10-2010 22:00

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Now here's what I'm wondering, could we legally use it on a FIRST robot? If FIRST ever made a game with small objects this could be useful...

gblake 27-10-2010 22:06

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jspatz1 (Post 978687)
I don't believe it is applying suction to the object in the traditional sense as with a suction cup. That would imply that the balloon material is porous, and that would leak vacuum all over. If I correctly interpret what is happening, the vacuum inside the balloon is causing the balloon material to constrict around the object, with the resulting friction causing it to "grip." Notice all objects are 3D, not flat, and that they force the balloon around the object before gripping it. Great example of an totally new idea.

I think the balloon is porous because of the sounds in the video.

It might not be porous, but if it isn't I don't think some of those objects would stay against it. The egg and the small items in particular.

Jon236 27-10-2010 22:17

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by corpralchee (Post 978696)
Now here's what I'm wondering, could we legally use it on a FIRST robot? If FIRST ever made a game with small objects this could be useful...

We were only required to use those delrin wheels in 2009........let's see what rules await us in January!

Alan Anderson 28-10-2010 08:30

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gblake (Post 978699)
I think the balloon is porous because of the sounds in the video.

It might not be porous, but if it isn't I don't think some of those objects would stay against it. The egg and the small items in particular.

Nope, the surface is not porous. It is grippy. It picks up the egg in much the same way you would, by squeezing it.

My son had a "Vac Man" toy (made by the same company that sold "Stretch Armstrong") that works along the same principles. Based on what it could do, I can imagine a much fancier universal gripper having "fingers" that might be capable of handling smaller or more delicate objects, or even curling into hooks to lift things with handles.

Greg Young 28-10-2010 12:39

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
The press release says it's a latex party balloon, so definitely not porous.

And yes, probably a coarse grind since it depends on the material locking together when compressed.

I'm awestruck. Simple. Elegant. I would never have thought of this.

Chris is me 28-10-2010 12:50

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
I'm at a loss as to how one should calculate grip force with that. Anyone have any ideas?

JesseK 28-10-2010 13:19

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 978774)
I'm at a loss as to how one should calculate grip force with that. Anyone have any ideas?

The good ol' fashioned method of picking up heavier weights until the weights started falling would probably be the least-painful way for most of us to figure it out. It all depends on the friction of the balloon, tensile strength of the balloon, and I'm sure the vacuum plays a large part in it too. Then we'd have to consider the angle of grip as well.

Brandon Holley 28-10-2010 13:41

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseK (Post 978780)
The good ol' fashioned method of picking up heavier weights until the weights started falling would probably be the least-painful way for most of us to figure it out. It all depends on the friction of the balloon, tensile strength of the balloon, and I'm sure the vacuum plays a large part in it too. Then we'd have to consider the angle of grip as well.

In a similar fashion...pick up an object, place a load cell or some kind of spring gauge on the object in the gripper and pull til it pops out. That will give you an idea for that particular object. The gripping force would obviously vary from object to object.

-Brando

Alan Anderson 28-10-2010 13:42

Re: Universal Robotic Gripper
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 978774)
I'm at a loss as to how one should calculate grip force with that. Anyone have any ideas?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JesseK (Post 978780)
...It all depends on the friction of the balloon, tensile strength of the balloon, and I'm sure the vacuum plays a large part in it too. Then we'd have to consider the angle of grip as well.

It seems to me that grip force would be essentially independent of the balloon. The only relevant factors I can think of immediately are the amount of "shrinkage" of the filler material when vacuum is applied, and the stability (probably shear strength, mostly) of the vacuum-compacted material.

(The friction of the balloon definitely matters when you try to figure how much weight you can pick up with a given grip force, of course.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi