![]() |
Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
So I have decided to CAD up 40 potential chassis's until kickoff ::ouch::.
Ya... Feel free to ask questions, give advice ect. The Robot Renderings may not be to detailed due to lack of time.:mad: ![]() ![]() It's like Brainstorming with Hours of effort and cool pictures. |
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Things I like: she is pretty :D
Things that could use improvement/addition: -Gearbox and chain run mounts should always be added to your CAD, they are pretty much the most important thing in a drive train besides the frame. -Twisting forces are going to be rough on the two drive pods. Due to their cantilevered nature. -1/4" plate is way to thick for this application, I think you will lose a lot of weight with less material and some well placed spacers. As a side note, why CAD 40 drive trains and spend 60+ hours when you could just do a napkin sketch? (I do admit CAD is fun, but it isn't really a necessary part of engineering design) |
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Day 2 ... and I have took your advice and added a transmission, but this design was finished 2 days ago so I did not make it out of thinner aluminum or add spacers for structural integrity.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The 6X6 were designed for climbing stuff, life steps or ramps, they were done days ago so they have no trans. The big problem with this design is... Where do you mount the bumperes... And I am doing this for fun/ Practicing my cad skills.:ahh: |
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Yeah mounting bumpers would be insane. Nice design though. :D
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
Regarding this entire thread, Instead of doing 40 different chassis please consider doing a couple chassis with several revisions of each. I like the concept of giving yourself a short time line as it will increase your skills but I think this would be a better use of time if you got something you could use out of it. |
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Very cool project, and I am sure your 40 designs will inspire others along about January 8th or so :)
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Day 3...Hear you go.:)
![]() ![]() This one ^ was from inside the support bar. In regards to weather or not we can make these chassis the team owns a cnc mill and a couple lathes so we can make alot. Previous years have been much more extravagant than our last robot. What killed us last year was our drive train, we did not "Keep it simple stupid" |
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Wow thats a lot of milling on those side pieces. You might consider going to a thinner tube wall thickness (1/16" over 1/8"). It would probably lighter than the heavily pocketed 1/8" wall thickness tube that you have there and might be stronger too.
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
In addition to Nick's comment I also have to point out that with this system you will run into the same problem you did last year once you decided to lock your wheels. This frame will drive forward and back very well but will not turn.
|
Re: Team 68's 40 days of chassis Design.
Quote:
And I have had about 6 chassis done before any comments about wall thickness came into play, so the future designs may be thinner. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi