![]() |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion
Quote:
The minibots must be deployed below the Deployment Line per <G20>. The definition of the Deployment Line: Quote:
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion
Quote:
For the minbot height limit, Quote:
Quote:
Starting a new thread: click that purple logo, find the appropriate subforum in the list, and click the "new thread" button. Scoring: Scoring grids are independent, as near as I can make out. |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
5.3.5 Coopertition Score (CS)
Any borrowed MINIBOT which scores points by legally triggering the TARGET during the MATCH receives one (1) Coopertition point for the FRC TEAM registered for the event that is affiliated with the MINIBOT. The total number of Coopertition points earned by a TEAM throughout the qualification matches will be their Coopertition score. Now the way I read this, your team can lend a minibot even when not competing? |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
I don't know how fun it will be to watch as a spectator, and I'm not sure how fast paced the game will be either. Seems kind of lame when coming from Breakaway...
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
Quote:
a) the team, assumed to be valid by reason of building it. b) a partner c) an opponent d) a team that is not participating in the match e) all of the above." |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
Can someone please post the KOP inventory list for veteran teams because I still cannot access the FIRST site
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
Eric,
I think they mean if a robot competes on the field that didn't pass inspection, then it's a red card. If the robot didn't pass inspection and doesn't go on the field, no red card. |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
Quote:
It's an easy fix, too: Replace "TEAM" with "TEAM's ROBOT" the first two times it appears in that rule. Boom, the team can show up and participate without the robot, and no red cards are issued. (Though the alliance is still at a disadvantage.) Also, due to the change back to W-L-T rankings, it shouldn't be as big of an issue as this last year. |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion
Quote:
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
Quote:
Agreed that there was a lot of action in Breakaway, you can't exactly say that this one will be lame until you've played it. |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
My initial thought was teams that excelled at handling and placing tubes in 2007 are going to dominate this game.
Also in a nod back to 2005 there is a "no-fly" zone on the field where if a team loses it's mind and does the unthinkably stupid and goes defend a robot placing tubes in their home zone they will get a debilitating penalty for their actions. Now more than ever teams need to make sure not only they know the rules but even more importantly their partners know the rules. |
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
anyone else saying thank you that team 25 was featured in the 2007 behind the design book? i sure know thats what i first thought of when i saw this. I dont see much reason to do anything but that, have a lift on the front and the minibot deployment on the back.
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion
I would also like a copy of the rules, please.
|
Re: FRC 2011: Logomotion [Initial Impressions]
One thing the manual does not say is how high the scoring rods are above the ground. I got the "middle being 8" above the others", but the avg height? That info would be good for an automatically adjusting height-based lifter.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi