![]() |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
If I recall, 80%+ of championship Einstein robots have been tank drive over the years. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
Second, I think that when the safe zone is only seven feet long (minus the 16" pegs for <6 feet), strafing could actually be really useful, especially since an effective defender will just body block in front of where they know you're going to put the tube. With a mecanum you can sort of get in from anywhere and sidle over, with tank that takes quite a bit longer. Third, I agree that while each system is stronger than the other in certain respects neither is inherently superior. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
6WD for 2 reasons: First is pushing power, second is "we've never done Mecanum before".
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
It's a pretty board statement, but from my experience I'd have to say 6WD because a macanum bot will get pushed around easily.
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
This drive system team 2404 used is interesting... it has many of the characteristics of the mecanum drive system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZf1-...eature=related |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
This drive system 2404 is testing is interesting. It has many of the pro's that mecanum wheels have.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqJK0E9Jpmk |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
I'm going to disagree with teams that go "mecanum = agility". Every year I see so many teams who say "oh we should be agile so we need a mecanum drive" and it drives me nuts.
First, agile is a very vague term. Mecanum has a specific kind of motion it can do that 6wd can't. The real question is do you need that kind of motion? Second, it is very easy to underrate the "agility" of a 6wd system. It can turn easily on a dime and drive very well in that fashion. The only thing it can't do is strafe. Essentially, the trade off is strafing sideways or resistance to pushing / pushing power. Which is more important? |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
We have done 6WD and mecanum, both have advantages. I do think that given the depth of the scoring zone, a mecanum drive could be a big advantage. Furthermore, while mecanum drive robots are easier to push around, I have found them to be more difficult to block. The ability to always be able to move directly away from a blocker is very nice. It makes it much more difficult to continuously block the robot.
All that said, the best drive train we have produced was probably for Rack 'N' Roll, a 6WD with omni wheels on the "front" (read: the end where the tube is dangling) and the other four wheels (aft and a little aft of center) were traction wheels. That year we geared for torque over speed, which served us pretty well. The base of our arm gave the back end a lot of traction, but the whole thing spun really close to in place. Side note: If you choose to do a one speed mecanum system you have to give yourself enough torque. We had quite a few problems in Overdrive with motors overheating because we didn't have enough torque when strafing. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
Well stated. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
How about Mechanum6? It could be like this:
\\\ ||| /// \\\ ||| /// So that there are six wheels, where the front and back pairs are Mechanum, and the center pair is straight Omnis. It seems like it could be possible, so it may not work. Just an idea. Thaine |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
I assume it would allow you enough traction to effectively push other mecanum bots, but thats about it. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi