![]() |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
To get across the field.
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
I really think whatever drive you choose is less important than it being designed properly, the people programming it, and the person driving it. Our team will be using mecanum again this year, not because it is inherently superior to all other drive platforms, but because we have experience with it, it works well with our strategy, we know how to program it for our purposes, and we have a driver who is crazy good with it. It isn't so much about the drivetrain, but how you use it.
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
6WD but have 2WD and 4W Floaters...either with Omni's or the Lunacy wheels
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Now my team captain said we are doing the 6 wheel drive with the middle wheel slightly lowered. We are extremely tight on budget this year, so any other would be asking for too much (except for 4 wheel drive)
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Mecanum isn't going to help much if you can't get to the scoring area. If a team on the other alliance plays defense, mecanum loses its value since it can't push
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
6WD allows for more traction. Neither is inherently better than the other in a 1v1 match up. The aspect that pushes that match up towards one side is going to be the amount of practice the drivers get with their robots, and robots with similar drive bases. If a defensive bot has experienced drivers that have had a couple years and a practice bot, and the mecanum offensive drivers have never touched a holonomic drive in their lives, the mecanum drive will be completely dominated. However, if the mecanum drivers have spent a hundred or more hours with the 3-axis joystick in their hands and the 6WD drivers are taking their first turn behind the drivers' station, a juke and a spin is all it will take to get into the scoring zone. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
We are going to test both. We have a team working on each type. We have found our past mecanum systems to be plenty fast. I also think that they are advantageous this year with the narrow feeder chute. It might be easier to make lateral corrections to our position with the crabbing ability. Rather than having to back up and turn, we can make small moves sideways if our tubes are a bit off.
As for dealing with defenders, our drivers have been able to use crabbing to outmaneuver less agile robots. We are sometimes a bit slower in a straightaway than 6 wheeled robots, but haven't been significantly disadvantaged by that. We are interested in whether the rocking motion of the CA drive will make use vulnerable to tipping when extended. Jury is still out, of course. |
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum or 6WD
Quote:
The key to either system is having a skilled driver who communicates effectively with the coach and his other driver. There are benefits and drawbacks to everything and we must be able to effectively figure out which downsides we can live with and which we can't. I personally am doing either 6wd or 8wd this year, we talked about mecanums (3450/314) but we are building multiple bots and doing that makes cost highly prohibitive. (4 gearboxes + 4 mecanum wheels for each bot) I am also an alumni from the Martian "defense" era. The best defense is having more traction than your opponent. For the record we also considered doing a swerve drive but buying 3 Revolution modules or 3 WildSwerve modules was out of the question price wise. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi