![]() |
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
i think my team intends to use surgical tubing to launch the mini-bot to the top in less time than 1 second. last years kicker on our robot only contacted the ball for 3 inches and was able to kick pretty far. i think we will be doing something similar for this.
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
What are the odds that a minibot launched by a slingshot will recieve a penalty?
I feel <G20> might be at risk as the slingshot might tap it after its initial release. |
Re: Minibot climb rate
Hmm, the calculations I'm getting from both of my 'drag race' calculators, adjusted for straight vertical ascent, comes out to just over 5 seconds. I'll investigate...
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
I would reccomend someone go and look back at their statics, dynamics, mechatronics and material science textbooks; these calculations are a little on the flimsy side.
If I were a student, I would start with a free body diagram and account for all of the forces involved. Then factor the motor in with all included drivetrain factors. You must then base a more practical time compared to your calculated "theoretical" time. Factor things in like manufacturing tolerances, material fatigue, material temperature change, etc. and read up on how they would effect your climb rate. Then, after your minibot is built, compare the two calculated times with the experimental time; the time it actually takes the minibot to assend to the top of the both. Run several trials and make improvements. |
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
You can use springs to launch it just as well if not better, they just have to be part of your main robot. |
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
[My original back-of-the-envelope calculations gave a time of 8s with one motor, but I can now see how some of my initial assumptions were flawed.] |
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
I applied the equations in this whitepaper to JVN's Calculator (with some other mods as well) last night and came up with some interesting calculations. Over lunch today I further tested things, and have reached some conclusions:
A 5-lb minibot can reach the top in under 6 seconds A 10-lb minibot will struggle to reach the top under 10 seconds A 15-lb minibot probably won't make it to the top under 20 seconds ("probably" because there's a 10% fudge factor here) There are only 5 gearing/wheel combinations that will even lift a 10-lb robot to the top in under 15 seconds, and all of those are well behind any of the 5-lb robot combinations. Thus, the lighter the better. |
Re: Minibot climb rate
That model is only good for a situation where the normal force is exactly opposite of the force caused by weight (mass X acceleration due to gravity) and perpendicular to the resulting force (driving forward).
In the case of a "climbing" robot, the most suitable analytical situation would assume the normal force is perpendicular to the pole the robot is latched to. I would recommend to all students draw a diagram of all the forces on their robots before using any calculators to see if the same situation applies. |
Re: Minibot climb rate
So now that update 1 says we have to use the motors and controller, can someone answer the original question - does anyone have the weight of the required components (battery pack, controller, motor) so we can start doing some real calcs?
|
Re: Minibot climb rate
Quote:
Which rule says that using the NXT is required? <R92> does not say that currently. Quote:
I will admit, the rule can change. If they do, we will adjust. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi