![]() |
Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
Well we obviously had no idea what we have gotten ourselves into but are excited to be apart of the program. We received our KoP and categorized each item and placed it into a closet with drawers and cataloged where we put each item. Then the team just sat there for a while and stared at each other with a blank look on each of our faces because none of us know really what any of the parts are used for or do. After much reading we have a better idea at what we want to do.
I'll try to limit my questions to a manageable amount but i'm sure i'll ask too much. Regarding our chassis would it be better to just use the KoP provided one for simplicities sake or CAD our own and weld it in our school mechanical shop? We were thinking of using 3/8ths inch aluminum cut to 1" width and basing the shape off of what we have seen very commonly done in the photos section. We plan to use the KoP wheels for now in a 6 wheel drive format. Would it be better to buy omnidirectional wheels for the outer 4 or to drop the middle wheel? The KoP doesn't seem to have come with enough sprockets for a 6 wheel drive so i'm guessing we will need to buy more. The KoP comes with two CIM motors but most designs i've seen have had 4 so i believe we will be purchasing an additional 2 but we are not sure if we need additional gearboxes for each CIM motor. Hopefully we will have all of this in CAD tomorrow so that we can move on to our manipulator design but we are just so unsure on how to proceed so any addition tips or advice to a rookie team will be much appreciated. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
The KOP CIMple gearboxes should have spaces for your additional CIMs.
Dropping the center wheel or using omnis on the outside is a bit of a tradeoff. Using omnis will keep your robot more stable and make it rock less, but aren't as good for pushing power. Dropping the center wheel will introduce some rocking, which could be detrimental trying to reach the high goals. However, you will gain more pushing power. I would recommend sticking with the KOP chassis, but that's just my opinion. Alternate drivetrains can be lighter, but usually take more time to make and are more complicated. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
No such thing as asking too much. There is such a thing as asking too fast, but not too much.
CIM motors: Each gearbox takes 2 (or one, if that's your design). KOP drivebase vs. custom: As you're rookies, KOP is the way to go. You can bolt, rivet, or (shocker) weld it. Tip: Make sure that you're 1" undersize in all directions. It's no fun getting to your first event to find that you don't fit in the sizing box. 6WD drop-center works well and resists turning a bit better than omnis on the corners. I believe the KOP chassis has a dropped hole somewhere on the side rails--that's about right. Yes, you will need to buy more sprockets/wheels. As it's your rookie year, you'll want a solid drivetrain. KOP plus an extra set of wheels, chained with #35, is very tough unless you throw a chain--and there are ways to mitigate the damage even then. You're doing some things right already: You're asking for advice, and you're organizing, and you're CADding. And working on the drivetrain first. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
for the drive train it greatly depends on the type of robot you are making (fast, slow, manurvable, good grip)
as for the chassis I would recomend using the KOP chassis your first year to save you build build time, we used it last year and it worked out well letting us focus on other problems |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
I would HIGHLY recommend using smaller (6") wheels with the kit transmission this year. The provided gear ratio is VERY fast, faster than you might be able to control with 8" wheels.
|
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
Quote:
My team was pretty set on building a custom frame but i don't think everyone was quite sure how much work that is actually going to take. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
That would also work, to a point.
At this point, I'd go with the KOP frame, and then study the custom frames posted in CD-Media to get a better idea. It's not exactly easy, but it's not exactly hard. Might be a little much right now, but maybe next year it'll be easier. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
Quote:
just be sure to leave yourself enough time to do so |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
Ok so i'm going to assume that we choose to do a custom frame would the 3/8" aluminum be best or is there a lighter or stronger option? Maybe i'll do a fast sketch of what we lined out.
|
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
I don't recommend a custom chassis as rookies. I was on a team that was not experienced and we made heavily customized drivetrain components that failed completely during competition. There is nothing more demoralizing than not being able to drive. Focus on reliability and simplicity. If your machine performs consistently and accomplishes at least some scoring aspect of the game you will do very well as rookies. Consistency is a very hard thing to achieve in this competition. I can't tell you how many times veteran teams pick up solid rookies as the 3rd or even 2nd team in an elimination alliance because they are reliable and can put up some points, or run some interference in a pinch. Sometimes the rookies are even up in the top 8 picking, even with a kitbot chassis and reliable manipulator.
Additionally I second the thought about the gear ratio being extremely fast this year for the kit chassis. Consider going a bit slower, especially if you are planning on have an arm to reach the tall posts, as the speed may be just what causes your robot to tip over. Going with smaller wheels can allow you to lower your machine's center of gravity and add to your stability as well. As far as omni's, there is an important consideration to make here. Are you planning on playing defense? Are you expected to be heavily defended against? Since the scoring zone is protected, you shouldn't expect defense while scoring so having the added maneuverability of 2 or 4 of the 6 wheels being omnis could help your ability to turn and get situated to score the tubes. If you are worried about getting pushed around in the middle, consider only two omni's or all traction type wheels. If you use a dropped center wheel, and have a tall arm placing tubes, the effect of the slight tilt of the robot from one set of 4 wheels to the other set of 4 can be magnified and cause problems. Good luck! |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
3/8" is either too big or too small.
The most common wall thickness is 1/8" on a 1x1 or larger tube. For a drivetrain, you probably want at least a 2"x1"x1/8" wall tube. Unless, of course, you have sheet metal thickness. A 3/8" outside dimension tube will be too small for a drivetrain. |
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
I would suggest you use the Kit Bot. It's pretty strong and not that heavy - there's no shame in using it! It's a very good option this year.
|
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
My rookie year we made our own fraim from 80/20 it worked very well for us and we made it to worlds so my suggestion would be to buld a simple effective desin THAT IS VERY EASY TO FIX!!!!!!! and if you are planning to make your chassy i would go for a 4 weel driveshain we went with 6 weel drive and it proved a challange to get the middle weel just right
|
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
80/20= HEAVY, and the kitbot frame is much simpler
|
Re: Rookie team questions on chassis and drive train
In your rookie year, I strongly advise you to use the kitbot. It provides a robust chassis and is just sitting there for you to assemble. Put it together and let your drivers get some practice ASAP.
If there is someone on the team who insists on building a custom chassis, let them do it, but continue development on the kitbot chassis. You simply do NOT have the time to figure out custom stuff. 1/12 of your time is already gone - think about that. 3/8" aluminum is a bit heavy, it really depends on what exactly you do, but I've rarely seen such heavy material on a robot in 7 years. Our drivetrain side plates are 1/8" thick if that helps. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi